How to review your life’s Amazon buying history—and what we learned from our own

How to review your life’s Amazon buying history—and what we learned from our own

https://ift.tt/2seed1c

Amazon

Ahead of the United States’ Memorial Day weekend, Ars staffers were milling about the virtual water cooler when someone happened upon some intriguing data: their personal Amazon shopping history. This spreadsheet, which consisted of years of purchases and thousands of dollars of receipts, was easy to compile within the Amazon account interface, and it fit nicely into that day’s chatter about other companies’ issues with data privacy and GDPR compliance.

So, for funsies, a bunch of us reviewed our past decade-plus Amazon existence by grabbing a giant spreadsheet from our individual “order history” pages. As Americans who’ve spent many years ordering things off the Internet, we at Ars all have Amazon shopping histories in common, but that doesn’t mean we all use the site the same—or feel the same about Amazon’s reach, quite frankly. See below for charts, examples of our first non-media (book or film) purchases at the site, and personal recollections about how Amazon has figured into our shopping lives over the years.

If you want to play along at home, by all means. This link should force you to enter your own Amazon credentials and then redirect you to an “order history” page. The first drop-down menu on the resulting page should already say “items.” Confirm that’s the case, then set the date range from January 1 of the earliest year on record to today. Then pick “request report” and you’ll receive a CSV spreadsheet file that can be parsed by Microsoft Excel and Google Sheets. You may need to split this into multiple reports (like, 2005-2009, 2010-today), should your shopping history be as big as some Ars staffers’.

Let the data (and knickknacks) begin

Samuel Axon, senior reviews editor: $8,285.42 since 2009

Most of my Amazon buying history is Christmas presents, as my family uses it for wish lists. Total dollars spent is also a misleading number, as my fiancée and I split some of the spending. That’s not reflected here, as she has transferred money from her account to mine to cover half the cost of many of those gifts.

What aren’t gifts are mostly purchases via killer deals I saw online through affiliate links on various tech and gaming sites. I generally try to avoid using Amazon as much as possible. Same-day delivery in LA is awesome, but I have concerns about one company basically owning all the retail infrastructure in the United States, which seems like where we’re headed. Also, Amazon needs to pay its fair share of taxes in the United States.

I’m always impressed with what Amazon has accomplished—its success is not unearned. But the more a company looks like a monopoly either actually or potentially, the more disinclined I am to give them my money.

Beth Mole, health reporter: $4,262.51 since December 2006

My first set of orders were presents for family members—a DVD set and books—which was a theme until around 2014 when my then-boyfriend (now-husband) added me to his Prime subscription. My first non-book/DVD/CD purchase wasn’t until October of 2007, when my brother and I went halfsies on a fancy kitchen mixer for my mom’s birthday.

My (sparse) order history between 2006 and 2013 continued to be mostly an odd assortment of presents for family and friends—which is actually kind of fun to look back on. For instance, it includes the first things I bought my nephew when he was born: a tuxedo bib, Goodnight Moon, and a shark robe (you know, baby essentials.)

Since getting Prime (and becoming lazier about going to actual stores), I’ve strayed more into domestic ordering, such as paper products, allergy medicine, soaps, and toothpastes. Boring stuff. But the past year, I started going back and forth between Amazon and Target, which now has free, generally fast shipping and sometimes better deals.

Valentina Palladino, associate reviewer: $9,726.12 since 2009, “72 orders a year for the past three years”

Unsurprisingly, most of my first Amazon purchases were books. I have a couple of fond memories of a delivery truck rolling up to my family’s home and its driver dropping off a single package for me containing the newest Harry Potter book that had just come out that day. Fortunately or unfortunately (depending on how you view it), my Harry Potter reading experience wouldn’t have been the same without release-day delivery from Amazon.

But my book purchases slowly took a backseat as years went by and as items like ink cartridges, HDMI cables, and two-pound bags of chia seeds became more important than the newest novel release. Today, I mostly turn to Amazon for necessities that cannot wait for my next IRL shopping trip, routinizing my online shopping and making most of my order history incredibly boring. It would be really easy for me to lean on Amazon for all of my purchases since I work from home, but I regularly try to take trips to retailers big and small for essentials, gifts, and home decor or other things that I want to have more personality.

Now it’s rare that I even buy a physical book from Amazon, but that’s because I’m an avid Kindle reader, so Amazon provides the reading material still with a some supplementation from my local library’s digital shelves. But on the rare occasion that I do order a physical book, I still get as excited to receive that package as I did years ago—and those will forever remain my favorite Amazon packages to receive.

Sean Gallagher, IT editor: $2,373.03 since 2006

Most of my early Amazon purchases were books, and I only made a few purchases per year until around 2016, when we opted into Prime. Almost everything I’ve personally bought aside from books is a tech-related (Arduino, OrangePi, Raspberry Pi, replacement laptop batteries, phone cases, cables) or a gift (Shark Bite novelty socks for my daughter, for example). But I’ve also bought stuff for my other silicon-based activity: pottery. There are a couple of orders for “Speedball 001066 Underglaze, Black,” as well as potter’s tools and chamois cloths for use in throwing pots on the wheel.

John Timmer, senior science editor: $3,500 since creating an Amazon account (no date given)

A disturbingly large amount of my purchases came via rewards points generated by my primary credit card—over half the entries include the term “gift card”—so the actual total of my own money is substantially lower than that.

The entries are an extremely random set of electronics, bike stuff, and one of my odder hobbies: growing wildly inappropriate trees from seeds in small apartments. The very first item is a device from a dead platform, a Palm Tungsten TX. From there, my record shifts into more sensible purchases, like SSDs (both of which I’m still using), keyboards, mice, and hard drives for my NAS. It looks like, for many years, whenever space was getting tight for my backups, I’d simply grab whatever gift certificates I had around, buy the biggest drive they would get me, and throw that into the NAS.

Biking stuff was a slow trickle for many years, mostly replacing worn-out things, until there was a sudden binge when I bought my first new bike in 25 years a little while back.

Then there are the seeds. I currently have a very small giant sequoia on my balcony. It’s a replacement for a coast redwood that I managed to get to my own height before it outgrew its pot and suddenly died. That’s a pattern I’ve been dealing with for a while: the trees look great right up until when they commit to dying, at which point no amount of care or larger pots can dissuade them. So there’s a steady stream of seed purchases, as I try to keep some new trees starting in case the older, larger one decides to give up; some buys happen just to deal with the fact that not every batch of seeds is good. The hope is, at some point, to get one of my trees that’s still healthy to someone’s house for planting. But it’s been a while, and it hasn’t happened yet.

Even more embarrassing is the knowledge that Amazon’s not my only supplier for this.

Jeff Dunn, tech writer: $3,116 since 2011

I was just wrapping up college at the time I opened my account, but my first major purchase came a few months later when I bought a Sony Vaio S as my first “professional” notebook. It was a bit of a splurge at the time, but my adolescent desire to not carry a MacBook like everyone else, combined with the fact that I had just spent three years using a junky Gateway, was enough justification for me. I think I witnessed about four other Vaio owners over the period I used mine.

That purchase alone continues to make up a third of my total Amazon spending. Since then, I’ve pretty much exclusively used the site to buy (Hank Hill voice) video games and video game accessories, with a few books and board games thrown in. This reinforces a few things for me:

1. I am a young guy who has never been married, had kids, or lived in an exceptionally large apartment. (This will all change soon enough, but I’ve been frugal while I could.)
2. I have never lived close to a GameStop and/or rarely find its prices appealing.
3. I spent the first couple years of my career writing about the video game industry.
4. I generally don’t like buying things online. Some deep-seated part of my monkey brain doesn’t trust online stores with things like food or basic household items; if I need those things, I usually want them now, and I don’t mind taking the walk or car ride to go get them. Getting away from the screen is healthy, right? I’ve made it a point to live within walking distance to a grocery store when hunting for my last few apartments, so that’s helped.

I’ve also covered Amazon enough to know that, for the wrong person, Prime becomes an excuse to buy things more than a helpful tool for buying things you planned to get anyway. I’m probably the wrong person in that case, so I’ve stayed away.

Megan Geuss, staff editor: $2,565 since 2009

I opened an Amazon account in 2005, when I apparently purchased a number of books for my sister’s high school language class. I have no recollection of this and no idea why I would have done this: I was already in college and living 350 miles away from home. But Amazon indicates that they were shipped to my sister, and they’re titles you read in high school: The Importance of Being Earnest, Tess of the d’Urbervilles (uggggh, a blight on English Literature), Lord of the Flies.

Amazon won’t give me prices for any of the books before 2008 for some reason, but I can tell you I bought exactly 10 books in my three first years as an Amazon customer. In 2009 I made my first non-book purchase: a heavy, red, 7.5-quart ceramic bowl. I had just moved into a proper apartment (I had been living in the basement of a house with six other people for a while), and I saved up to get something nice. I still have it, and I love it.

In total, I’ve bought 107 items from the retailer, and in many cases a group of items represents an order of several books before a school semester. I don’t have data on the 10 first items, and my above tally includes every purchase after those. My spendiest year was 2017, which was the year a number of weddings and new babies happened in the family, so there were a lot of gifts to buy.

Mostly, looking over my Amazon history, I’m struck by how much Amazon potentially knows about me. My purchases are pretty mundane, but you could deduce a lot about me from this order history. With that realization, I’ll probably try to buy less from the store in the future.

Tech

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

May 28, 2018 at 08:06AM

Clubbing in the Wild: A Nature Documentary Parody About the Mating Rituals of Humans

Clubbing in the Wild: A Nature Documentary Parody About the Mating Rituals of Humans

https://ift.tt/2H0lyGa

A first ever look at humans in their natural habitat… the club! The narrator does a remarkably good impression of Sir David Attenborough!

[Viva la Dirt League]

The post Clubbing in the Wild: A Nature Documentary Parody About the Mating Rituals of Humans appeared first on Geeks are Sexy Technology News.

Tech

via [Geeks Are Sexy] Technology News https://ift.tt/23BIq6h

May 28, 2018 at 03:17PM

PUBG Dev Suing Fortnite Studio For Copyright Infringement In Korea

PUBG Dev Suing Fortnite Studio For Copyright Infringement In Korea

https://ift.tt/2GXYpUX

After suggesting it might take action, the developer of PUBG has filed a lawsuit against the creator of Fortnite on the ground of copyright infringement. PUBG Corp., which is based in Korea, filed its lawsuit against US-based Epic Games with the aim of getting the courts to decide if Fortnite represents some kind of copy of PUBG. A PUBG Corp. representative told Korea Times that its lawsuit against Epic was actually filed back in January in the Seoul Central District Court. Epic Games Korea, a division of Epic Games, is the defendant.

Back in September, PUBG Corp. said it was "concerned that Fortnite may be replicating the experience for which PUBG is known." The Korean studio said PUBG is the "first standalone Battle Royale survival shooter game."

No Caption Provided

The report does not mention any specific claims in lawsuit, but PUBG Corp. said previously that it had "concerns" about Fortnite’s UI, gameplay, and "structural replication" as it relates to the similarities between the gameplay and systems in both PUBG and Fortnite.

Adding to the drama, PUBG Corp. apparently had a business relationship with Epic, as the Korea studio licensed Epic’s Unreal Engine for PUBG.

For more on PUBG vs. Fortnite, check out GameSpot’s video above where we explore the legal side of the issue and speak to talk to video game attorney Ryan Morrison. Bear in mind that the video dates back to October 2017, and there have been some notable developments since.

This time last year, PUBG was seen as the No. 1 battle royale game, but a lot of attention and awareness currently is around Fortnite. Epic’s game has exploded in popularity, and is reportedly a money-making juggernaut. A recent report said the free game brought in almost $300 million in revenue during April alone from its various microtransactions.

PUBG Corp.’s lawsuit against Epic is apparently limited to Korea. We searched the United States courts database and found no results for a lawsuit against Epic from PUBG Corp. That being said, whatever happens in the Korean lawsuit could impact other parts of the world. This will be an ongoing story, so keep checking back for more.

An Epic Games representative told GameSpot, "We don’t comment on ongoing litigation."

Games

via GameSpot’s PC Reviews https://ift.tt/2mVXxXH

May 28, 2018 at 08:39PM

Watch Zenvo TSR-S’s fascinating Centripetal Wing active aero at work

Watch Zenvo TSR-S’s fascinating Centripetal Wing active aero at work

https://ift.tt/2kyY16q

The

Zenvo TSR-S

is the middle sibling in the Danish carmaker’s three-model lineup. The

1,163-horsepower TS1 GT

sticks to the road with a demure rear wing, while the

racetrack-only, 1,102-hp TS1

sticks to the track with a high fixed wing. The

road-legal TSR-S

plays both sides, but outdoes its track-only sibling in two ways: It has 1,177 hp and an

active “Centripetal Wing”

that moves in two planes to increase cornering grip.

The wing’s trailing edge can rise a little to increase downforce, or a lot to act as an air brake. In corners, one side of the wing will lift in order to create what Zenvo calls the “centripetal” force; when the TSR-S turns right, the right side of the wing lifts, and vice versa. Zenvo says that in doing so, downforce remains perpendicular to the wing surface, resulting in more force on the inside wheel and more grip. While overall downforce drops by about 3 percent, angling the wing shifts 30 percent of overall downforce to the inside wheel.

Zenvo took the TSR-S to test at the Assen

TT

Circuit in The Netherlands, running with a bunch of high-dollar machinery. Admittedly, the rollercoaster centripetal wing is completely distracting, looking something like a class project devised by

garagiste

engineering students. But all kinds of inventions have made many people feel the same way, at least until they started winning, so we look forward to seeing where this goes.

Related Video:

Cars

via Autoblog http://www.autoblog.com

May 29, 2018 at 09:19AM

Russian unit, GRU officer linked to 2014 shoot-down of airliner over Ukraine

Russian unit, GRU officer linked to 2014 shoot-down of airliner over Ukraine

https://ift.tt/2IPhk67

Enlarge /

Eliot Higgins (C), founder of online investigation group Bellingcat, addresses a press conference on findings within research on Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 in Scheveningen, The Netherlands, on May 25, 2018. – The Netherlands and Australia on May 25 accused Moscow of being behind the 2014 shooting down of flight MH17 over war-torn eastern Ukraine with the loss of 298 lives, in a move which may trigger legal action.

REMKO DE WAAL / Getty Images

Officials from the Netherlands and Australia today formally stated that they are convinced Russia was responsible for the deployment of the “Buk” anti-aircraft missile system that shot down Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 (MH17) in 2014.  The announcement came a day after a Dutch-led joint investigation team released a report on their findings, which concluded the missile had belonged to the Russian Army’s 53rd anti-aircraft brigade, which was based outside the city of Kursk, north of the Ukrainian border.

Physical evidence collected by investigators, along with radar track and flight recorder data, pointed to the use of a specific warhead type associated with Buk surface-to-air missiles. Paint transferred from fragments of the missile to the aircraft’s fuselage was matched with recovered parts of the missile.

Russia has long denied that any of its military equipment ever crossed the border into eastern Ukraine, and the Russians presented several alternative scenarios—including blaming the downing of the airliner on a Ukrainian Air Force pilot. The Russians at first claimed to have radar evidence proving their allegation, but the country then said it was lost—only to claim they had found the evidence again just two days before the Joint Investigative Team’s 2016 press conference. The separate target that Russia claimed to have identified on radar was actually part of MH17’s  fuselage breaking away after the missile detonated.

Tech

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

May 25, 2018 at 04:49PM

FBI tells router users to reboot now to kill malware infecting 500k devices

FBI tells router users to reboot now to kill malware infecting 500k devices

https://ift.tt/2ILS198

Linksys

The FBI is advising users of consumer-grade routers and network-attached storage devices to reboot them as soon as possible to counter Russian-engineered malware that has infected hundreds of thousands devices.

Tech

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

May 25, 2018 at 01:26PM

Alexa’s recording snafu was improbable, but inevitable

Alexa’s recording snafu was improbable, but inevitable

https://ift.tt/2LuFuV6


Engadget

Amazon’s Alexa recently made headlines for one of the strangest consumer AI mistakes we’ve ever heard of: A family in Portland, Oregon claims that the company’s virtual assistant recorded a conversation and sent it to a seemingly random person in the husband’s contact list. Alexa didn’t just make one slip-up — it made several that, when combined, led to a pretty remarkable breach of privacy. The company’s explanation, provided to news outlets yesterday, makes clear just how unlikely this whole situation was:

“Echo woke up due to a word in background conversation sounding like ‘Alexa,'” the statement reads. “Then, the subsequent conversation was heard as a “send message” request. At which point, Alexa said out loud “To whom?” At which point, the background conversation was interpreted as a name in the customers contact list. Alexa then asked out loud, “[contact name], right?” Alexa then interpreted background conversation as ‘right’.”

That is, without question, absolutely wild. Given a handful of factors at play here, though, it was likely inevitable that Alexa would’ve goofed spectacularly at some point. I’m not a betting man, but let’s look at the numbers: Right after Christmas, Amazon confirmed that it has sold “tens of millions” of Alexa-enabled devices around the world. New research indicates that Google has for the first time overtaken Amazon as the world’s premier purveyor of smart speakers, but no matter — people are or were talking to at least 20 million Alexa devices around the world. That amounts to a huge number of interactions for Alexa to interpret every day, and it was only a matter of time before the right set of circumstances produced a situation that Alexa just couldn’t handle.

Alexa’s cascading failure here isn’t simply due to a numbers game, either. It’s also because Alexa can be lousy at its job. Looking back through my own Alexa history — which contains recordings of every interaction I’ve ever had with it — reveals a handful of false positives that shouldn’t have triggered the assistant in the first place. In some cases, a droning voice on TV said a word that kinda-sorta sounded like “Alexa,” which prompted the assistant to try and interpret what else the person was saying. In others, the recording stored by Amazon didn’t include the Alexa wake word at all, leaving me perplexed as to why Alexa was trying to listen in the first place. It probably won’t come as a surprise that most of the recordings that lacked an audible “Alexa” were snippets from a television show or a conversation that was never meant for Amazon to hear.

Even now, Alexa is still a more mysterious figure in my life than I’d like. It once laughed at me out of nowhere in the middle of the night, a profoundly creepy feat that very nearly made me hurl my Echo out a window. My stored history also doesn’t include the handful of times when I’ve seen my Echo light up blue out of the corner of my eye. Alexa’s virtual ears clearly perked up, but the assistant never bothered to respond. Since Amazon’s Alexa history only seems to keep records of interactions where Alexa offers a verbal response, I can’t fully explain what’s going on in those moments when Alexa is triggered but remains silent. (Maybe it was one of those silent, Alexa-triggering signals we’ve known about for months.)

Considering the number of accidental triggers and responses in my history, it’s not hard to imagine how the right kind of conversation could have prompted Alexa to send a recording to a random contact. As Amazon says, this was incredibly unlikely, but as long as Alexa remains aggressive in attempting to pull signals from noise, these situations will never be completely impossible.

Amazon has said that it’s working on ways to make these kinds of situations even less likely, a tacit admission that Alexa still needs work. Even that may be an understatement. Through the process of recording a family and sending that recording to someone else, Alexa was doing exactly what it was designed to: It listened for signals regardless of their origin and took action based on those signals. Had Alexa been able to more fully understand what was being said in that conversation, it’s likely this whole thing would’ve never have happened. While Alexa has become one of the dominant voice assistants out there, it is in some ways surprisingly unsophisticated, and the only way to prevent these situations from happening again is to make Alexa smarter. Amazon is clearly keen to take on the task, but until the company’s engineers push some new boundaries, don’t be surprised if Alexa continues to surprise with its occasional incompetence.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

May 25, 2018 at 01:06PM