Australia Bans Cash For All Purchases Over $7,500 Starting July of 2019

Australia Bans Cash For All Purchases Over $7,500 Starting July of 2019

https://ift.tt/2G6vtJT

Australia’s Liberal Party government has announced that it will soon be illegal to purchase anything over $10,000 AU ($7,500 US) with cash. The government says it’s, “encouraging the transition to a digital society,” and cracking down on tax evasion. But not everyone is happy with the move.

“This will be bad news for criminal gangs, terrorists and those who are just trying to cheat on their tax or get a discount for letting someone else cheat on their tax,” Treasurer Scott Morrison said in a speech announcing the government’s new budget. “It’s not clever. It’s not OK. It’s a crime.”

The ban starts on July 1, 2019 and any payment over $10,000 will have to be made by check or credit/debit card. The government will enforce the measure by allocating roughly $300 million for what it calls the Black Economy Standing Taskforce. The goal is to drum up about $3 billion in new tax revenue over the next four years.

As The Guardian points out, one of the biggest targets for the new task force will be the illicit tobacco trade. Australia has the highest tax on cigarettes in the world, with an average pack costing about $40 AU ($30 US). But there’s a huge black market for cigarettes, which comes from both stolen goods and smuggling from outside the country. Taxes aren’t paid on cigarettes until the point of sale, so theft from tobacco warehouses is unusually common in Australia.

Australians have a strange relationship with cash—strange in the sense that they still use it. Roughly 37 percent of all commercial transactions in Australia are made using cash. That number is just 32 percent in the U.S. and 15 percent in Sweden. Many Swedes are angry about its slow move to a cashless society, arguing that going completely digital causes security concerns. And India began phasing out a whopping 86 percent of its currency in November of 2016 by invalidating 500 and 1,000-rupee notes as legal tender.

But there are also regional quirks that make the Australian government more prone to crack down on cash. For instance, it’s almost impossible to find a $100 bill in circulation in Australia. The Reserve Bank of Australia still prints the $100, so where do they all go? The rarity of the $100 note (nicknamed The Kermit for its green color) is attributed to both massive hoarding overseas as well as being the preferred method of payment for organized crime in Australia. Some Australian economists has even floated the idea of phasing out the Kermit, but there’s been significant pushback from the public.

While a ban on cash purchases over $10,000 may not seem like a big deal for the average person, plenty of small businesses are upset about the plan.

“It’s going to screw me—95 percent of my business is cash collections,” Paul Thomas, owner of Commander Security Services in Sydney, told News Corp this week. “On a monthly basis, we could process and move up to $4-5 million—either picking up cash, processing and EFT-ing it to customers’ accounts, or recarrying it from customers to their bank branch.”

Today it’s any sum over $10,000 in Australia, but anyone with their eyes open can see where this is going. We should expect governments to move away from cash over the next decade, just as currency anarchists continue to insist that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are the real future.

Researchers in the 1970s predicted that a widespread debit card system would be the perfect surveillance tool. And they weren’t exactly wrong. What they didn’t predict was what happens when a completely digital economy gets hacked. Equifax’s recent loss of so much personal data on virtually half of all Americans could feel like just a prelude to many more snafus to come.

[News Corp and The Guardian]

Tech

via Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com

May 11, 2018 at 07:09AM

The Morning After: Robots running free

The Morning After: Robots running free

https://ift.tt/2G8D9v8


Boston Dynamics

Welcome to Friday! We’re wrapping up our Google I/O coverage today, but we’ve also taken a behind-the-scenes look at how the Guardians of the Galaxy got a redesigned ship, a possible due date on the end of Net Neutrality and a robot frolicking in a field.


I didn’t sign up to take a Turing Test today.
Google: Duplex phone calling AI will identify itself

While the Duplex AI demo Google showed during I/O was impressive, it creeped many of us out by pretending to be human. On a phone call with apparently unaware restaurant and salon workers, the system peppered its conversation with “umms” and “ahhs” while setting up appointments. That tech might make it more comfortable to talk to, but now Google has confirmed that when it starts testing the feature in Google Assistant this summer, it will let people know they’re talking to an automated system.


How long does the battery last at full sprint? Asking for a human friend.
Boston Dynamics’ Atlas robot shows off its agility for the scouts

The humanoid robot took an untethered jog and showed off its vertical ability by leaping over a log. Atlas isn’t ready for a free agent NFL contract just yet, but comparing the robot’s smooth moves now to demos from 2009 shows just how far the technology has come.


Marvel’s most unorthodox heroes have a new home in ‘Avengers: Infinity War.’
Designing a spaceship for the Guardians of the Galaxy

Avengers: Infinity War is a jam-packed movie, flipping between superheroes young and old as they try to defend against Thanos. Almost every scene required a tremendous amount of computer-generated visual effects, meaning Marvel had to tap a small army of external partners to complete the project, including a company based in London and San Francisco called Territory Studio. The independent team worked on over a hundred 130 animated “screens” of make-believe software, with a lot of this work focused on the Guardians of the Galaxy’s spaceship. These exotic control panels are the tip of Territory’s contributions, which spanned tables, door air locks and a spherical escape pod. The company’s mission was to reinvent the UI — and by extension, the larger look and feel — of the Guardians’ moving home. It was a small piece of the movie but an important one to quickly convey how the group had been living since the end of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2.


There’s a slim chance the House and Senate could repeal, though.
Net Neutrality dies June 11th

Net Neutrality officially dies June 11th, almost three years to the day after it was put into law. In a press release from Ajit Pai’s office, he repeated his rhetoric that the internet was never broken and bemoaned Title II rules (more rigorous regulation which touches on throttling, blocking and paid prioritization of data) as being “heavy handed” and “outdated.”

The US Senate has forced a vote, scheduled for next week, to overturn Pai’s decision. If the Senate is successful, the House of Representatives will have to take similar measures before Pai’s framework is overruled. For now, a handful of states have passed their own bills upholding Title II provisions.


Ditch the dock.
Nintendo is making a $20 charging stand for the Switch

You can game on the Switch in various ways, but if you want to charge while playing in Tabletop mode, you’d have to be creative in finding ways to prop it up. Even if you do find a way, you’re at risk of ruining its cord, considering its charging port is at the bottom. Nintendo’s thankfully fixing that problem by releasing a $20 accessory, which serves as a charger and an adjustable stand. It’ll arrive next month, ready for that summer vacation / staycation.

But wait, there’s more…


The Morning After is a new daily newsletter from Engadget designed to help you fight off FOMO. Who knows what you’ll miss if you don’t Subscribe.

Craving even more? Like us on Facebook or Follow us on Twitter.

Have a suggestion on how we can improve The Morning After? Send us a note.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

May 11, 2018 at 05:51AM

Google’s AI advances are equal parts worry and wonder

Google’s AI advances are equal parts worry and wonder

https://ift.tt/2I81OWN


ANDRZEJ WOJCICKI/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

I laughed along with most of the audience at I/O 2018 when, in response to a restaurant rep asking it to hold on, Google Assistant said “Mmhmm”. But beneath our mirth lay a sense of wonder. The demo of Google Duplex, “an AI system for accomplishing real-world tasks over the phone,” was almost unbelievable. The artificially intelligent Assistant successfully made a reservation with a human being over the phone without the person knowing it wasn’t real. It even used sounds like “umm,” “uhh” and tonal inflections to create a more convincing, realistic cadence. It was like a scene straight out of a science fiction movie or Black Mirror.

When I played that clip again on Google’s blog post later, my wonder turned to unease. I dissected that conversation, analyzing all the ways that the AI mimicked human behavior. Its methods, I discovered, were incredibly sophisticated. It didn’t just insert random pauses or nonverbal sounds, but did so in places that made sense. And even the way it said things like “Ohh, I gotcha,” were so lifelike they were laden with meaning and subtext. Assistant conveyed rich, high-context information in simple sentences, just as we humans do — with sarcasm and ambiguity. How did it get so creepily real?

It’s been a year since CEO Sundar Pichai declared the intention to shift focus from “mobile first” to “AI first.” Since then, Google has invested heavily in machine learning research, developing frameworks to create more sophisticated applications that can basically think for themselves.

There’s no denying Google’s pivot to AI has brought some truly useful new features. Photos, for one, can identify the exact outline of a subject like your adorable toddler, and turn everything else in the picture grayscale to make a stylized picture. Or it can take an old black-and-white photo, identify the trees or the grass and colorize them appropriately. Meanwhile, the revamped News app will use AI to pick a variety of sources to deliver full, rounded perspectives on news stories. Smart Replies, which debuted in Inbox as early as 2015, and its logical extension Smart Compose, can save you the trouble of coming up with answers to your friends’ inane emails. In every one of Google’s vast array of products, AI has been inserted to improve performance and utility. They’re getting smarter and faster at understanding not just context but also our preferences and behaviors, meaning we can think less, and let the computers do that for us.

With Duplex, Assistant will be able to book restaurants and services for you via a phone call. Simply ask it to make you a haircut appointment on Tuesday between 10am and noon, for example, and Assistant will call your designated salon and sort out your reservation. It’s like having a real-life personal assistant, and if Google pulls this off, the convenience it offers would be immense.

Google

But Duplex doesn’t simply think for us, it emotes for us, as well. In an effort to prevent the person on the other end from catching on or feeling uncomfortable, the system has injected human imperfections in its speech to reproduce natural conversations.

How far are we (and Google and its peers) going to let AI go? How much of our tasks are we going to relegate to a disembodied voice? These aren’t new questions — the industry has been debating such ethical and philosophical issues for years. But before the Duplex demo, the idea of AI that can trick you into thinking it’s an actual human seemed unrealistic and far away. Suddenly though, answering those questions seems quite urgent.

The AI revolution had seemingly harmless beginnings. Neural networks applied to text recognition and translation brought great results, offering more accurate interpretations of languages as complex as Mandarin. Then they learned to identify faces the way we humans do, even from just a profile, beat us at complex games, and began to surpass real doctors in accurately predicting heart attacks. There seems to be no limit to what AI can do with enough training and models.

Close-up of emulation robotic operator with headset

It’s hard to imagine the goal isn’t to remove as much thought and effort on the user’s part as possible. Even if the trade-off for all that convenience is blurring the line between human and robot. AI’s already taken over as photographer in Google’s smart camera Clips, and to a lesser extent in phones like the Huawei P20 Pro and LG G7 ThinQ. The extension of that to the rest of our lives seems nigh.

With Duplex, Google currently leads its peers in the race to develop natural-sounding AI, and may perhaps even be close to creating a robot that can pass the Turing test. Other companies like Apple, Amazon and Facebook will surely redouble their own AI efforts, collectively pushing the limits of what machines can achieve.

I/O 2018 shows we’ve made significant progress in realizing something that’s existed mostly as a science fiction concept forever, but we’ve still barely scratched the surface of what’s possible. But, maybe it’s time that we pump the brakes, even if ever so slightly. We’re not past the point of no return, yet, and we should figure out, as a society, what our endgame is with AI. Do we want it to be a soulless helper? Or are we willing to wrestle with computers that behave in ways that are increasingly indistinguishable from a person?

Click here to catch up on the latest news from Google I/O 2018!

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

May 11, 2018 at 08:03AM

Syfy drops ‘The Expanse’ after three seasons

Syfy drops ‘The Expanse’ after three seasons

https://ift.tt/2IAkcHi

‘The Expanse’

Rafy/Syfy

After three seasons, The Expanse is coming to an end — at least on Syfy. Deadline reports that the cable network decided not to go forward with a fourth season of the show, however its producer, Alcon Television Group will look for another home. Described by network execs as Syfy’s “most ambitious effort to date” when it was originally announced, the show (based on a series of books by the same name) drove a shift on the network back toward larger-scale sci-fi in the vein of Battlestar Galactica.

However, it was expensive to make and reportedly had lower ratings than other shows like The Magicians and Krypton, and, perhaps most importantly, Syfy only had the rights to its first-run live airings. That meant the network did not benefit from digital sales or streaming which can be a sizeable share for sci-fi shows. Now fans will hope that another network or streaming service continues where Syfy left off, even as the Comcast/NBC-owned network announces launch dates for a summer slate that includes 12 Monkeys, Wynonna Earp, Killjoys and, of course, Sharknado 6.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

May 11, 2018 at 04:03AM