And now, a ship that can mine 39,000 tons of ore from a mile under water

And now, a ship that can mine 39,000 tons of ore from a mile under water

https://ift.tt/2HEKrMY

Last month in China, the Mawei Shipyards launched the Deep Sea Nautilus, the world’s first ship designed for mining deepwater seabeds.

The Deep Sea Nautilus is a 745-foot-long megaship capable of carrying 39,000 tons of ore—plus a 200-person crew and deep-sea mining robots. Nautilus Minerals, which owns the ship, plans to start gold and copper mining in the Solwara I, a mile-deep site in the coastal waters of Papua New Guinea.

Nautilus Minerals is a Canadian company with an ambitious deep-sea mining plan, centered around high-tech underwater robots that wouldn’t look totally out of place in Star Wars. This February the company successfully tested its line-up of three robots at depths of 1,500 meters, or about 0.93 miles, or about 4900 feet.

Two robots are purpose-built for preparing and pulverizing the metal rich seabed; a third robot will mix the pulverized ore into a slurry, to be pumped up to the Deep Sea Nautilus for further processing.

Tongling Nonferrous Metals Group, a Chinese copper company, will be the first buyer of Nautilus Minerals’ ore. This kind of purchase further indicates ambitions for large-scale deep-sea operations by Chinese firms. Chinese mining companies already hold three mining licenses in the Pacific Ocean from the International Seabed Authority, while railroad equipment maker China Railroad Corporation purchased Soil Mechanics Dynamic, a leading manufacturer of underwater mining and construction equipment.

China’s deep-sea mining would enable the nation to maintain sovereign control over strategic resources like copper and
rare earth minerals. Activities in international waters would also extend Chinese commercial presence in the global commons as well as further solidify Chinese claims to waters in the East and South China Seas. And, of course, the vast amount of oceangraphic data gathered by deep sea mining could prove useful to military operations like submarine and anti-submarine warfare.

Peter Warren Singer is a strategist and senior fellow at the New America Foundation. He has been named by Defense News as one of the 100 most influential people in defense issues. He was also dubbed an official “Mad Scientist” for the U.S. Army’s Training and Doctrine Command. Jeffrey is a national security professional in the greater D.C. area.

You may also be interested in:

Tech

via Popular Science – New Technology, Science News, The Future Now https://ift.tt/2k2uJQn

April 30, 2018 at 09:10AM

Blue Origin completes its highest-ever test flight

Blue Origin completes its highest-ever test flight

https://ift.tt/2I5WphQ


Blue Origin

Blue Origin’s first test flight of 2018 was a success, and then some. After last-minute weather setbacks, Jeff Bezos’ outfit completed its eighth New Shepard launch and landing, including a touchdown for the dummy-equipped Crew Capsule 2.0. More importantly, it represented a crucial milestone — the mission reached an apogee of 351,000 feet, which is both the highest altitude yet and the target for Blue Origin’s full-fledged service.

There are still more test flights to go. However, this increases the chances that Blue Origin will achieve its dream of launching a human-crewed flight later in 2018. It’s also a good sales pitch for customers, particularly those who may want to use the more powerful New Glenn (New Shepard users get first crack at it) when it’s ready in the 2020s. The mission shows that Blue Origin can meet key goals and may well provide a viable alternative to companies like SpaceX.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

April 29, 2018 at 04:03PM

Huawei may have a backup OS in case it has to drop Android

Huawei may have a backup OS in case it has to drop Android

https://ift.tt/2I2BPPL


Chris Velazco/Engadget

It’d be hard to blame Huawei executives if they’re feeling very nervous lately. The US has created havoc for ZTE by renewing an export ban over trade violations, potentially depriving it of its Android license and leaving it without a platform. How would Huawei avoid a similar fate? Simple: it would use its own operating system instead. South China Morning Post sources have claimed that Huawei has been developing its own mobile operating system (there are reportedly tablet and PC equivalents) ever since it and ZTE faced an American investigation in 2012. It’s considered an investment for “worst-case scenarios,” the insiders said.

The company hasn’t released this OS because it isn’t up to Android’s level of quality and app support, the sources added.

Huawei hasn’t confirmed or denied the software’s existence, saying only that it “has no plans” to launch an in-house OS in the “foreseeable future” — if there is one, there’s no rush to use it. There was a purported meeting leak in 2012 that referenced a new platform.

It certainly wouldn’t be surprising if Huawei had its own software at the ready. For one, the concept isn’t unheard of: Samsung makes Tizen phones partly as a failsafe, while Apple was developing OS X/macOS on Intel for years in case it needed to switch away from PowerPC (which, of course, it did). And like those companies, it already has its own custom processors courtesy of HiSilicon. While it uses third-party hardware for some devices, it would have an easier time dropping American products than some of its rivals.

That’s not to say that ditching Android would be easy. If it had to drop Android, it would lose ready-made access to Google services outside of China. Even a powerhouse phone like the P20 Pro would lose its allure if you had to either use third-party clients or stop using your Google account. Even in China, where Google services are blocked, vendors who could still use Android might have an advantage just by virtue of the abundance of apps. This secondary OS would mostly help Huawei avoid a nightmare situation where it suddenly lost Android and couldn’t sell any phones until it found new software.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

April 29, 2018 at 03:09AM

Tesla driver banned from road for leaving his seat while on Autopilot

Tesla driver banned from road for leaving his seat while on Autopilot

https://ift.tt/2Kl8K0d

We’d like to say that a driver in England has taken

Tesla

Autopilot hands-off irresponsibility to a whole new level — by activating the driver-assist feature on a busy roadway, then moving to the passenger seat and leaving the wheel and pedals unattended. We’d like to say that, except in a search of

YouTube

for video of this incident, we discovered a long, alarming list of people who have done the same thing, some going even so far as to crawl into the backseat.

In the case before us now out of England, the reckless driver has had his license suspended for 18 months. Bhavesh Patel, 39, of Nottingham, England, pleaded guilty to dangerous driving in St Albans Crown Court on April 20. In addition to the driving ban, he will do 100 hours of community service and pay a fine.

Patel also offered a glimpse into the mind of a Tesla fanboy with his explanation for what he did.

On the summer evening of May 21, 2017, Patel was driving his white

Tesla Model S

northbound on the M1 motorway near Hemel Hempstead, northwest of

London

, when he decided to turn on the Autopilot function then abandon the controls altogether. Someone in another car noticed and shot a snippet of video, which you can see above. (Remember, it’s England, so right-hand drive. He’s sitting in the left seat, though he’s hard to make out because police have blurred his face. But you can definitely tell that the driver’s seat is empty.)

The witness said Patel appeared to have his hands behind his head.

Traffic was heavy, and the estimated speed was 40 mph.

The video went up on social media, which allowed police to track Patel down. Police said he told them that he knew what he did was “silly” — not dangerous, not risking the lives of everyone around him, but “silly.” But he said the car was capable of doing something “amazing” and that he was just the “unlucky one who got caught.”

The only “amazing” thing is that nobody got hurt. But to Patel’s latter point, at least, the collection of videos on YouTube —

which were posted by the Tesla owners themselves —

proves he’s right.

Tesla told police what it has stated in

case

after

case

of crashes involving Autopilot: Its suite of driver-assistance features were meant to be used hands-on, and only to complement a “fully attentive driver.”

Tesla literature states that a driver should “never depend on TACC [traffic-aware cruise control] to adequately slow down

Model S

, always watch the road in front of you and be prepared to take corrective action at all times. Failure to do so can result in serious injury or death.”

Our

Autoblog Green

Senior Editor John Belz Snyder recently traveled to Silicon Valley to

review the Tesla Model 3

, and he also provided a sidebar regarding

serious issues he observed with Autopilot

.

Tesla owners, do you get it? Clearly some of you don’t. This shouldn’t need to be said, but Autopilot, or any driver-assistance technology on the market today, requires vigilant oversight — and not from the passenger seat.

Related Video:

Cars

via Autoblog http://www.autoblog.com

April 28, 2018 at 06:56PM

This Shape-Shifting, Pin-Headed Robot Lets You Feel Virtual Objects With Your Bare Hands

This Shape-Shifting, Pin-Headed Robot Lets You Feel Virtual Objects With Your Bare Hands

https://ift.tt/2jdNCfG

Virtual reality headsets today use your eyes and ears to make simulated experiences seem more real, but what about your other senses? Researchers at Stanford University have come up with a way for your hands and fingers to feel virtual objects with a unique robot that looks like an animated version of those Pin Art toys.

ShapeShift looks like a small desktop PC augmented with a dense grid of rectangular ‘pins’ on top. When it’s moved around on a flat surface like a table, a tracking marker syncs the location of the ShapeShift box to the location of the user’s hands in a virtual reality world. When the user’s virtual hands reach out to touch a virtual object, the pins atop the ShapeShift extend and retract to form a crude representation of that object in the real world, allowing it to be felt and touched.

The ShapeShift box can also be mounted on an omnidirectional robot platform, so instead of the VR user having to move it around, the box moves itself, guiding the user’s hands to a specific object or experience.

A bunch of rectangular metal rods moving up and down won’t quite recreate the experience of, say, petting a fluffy kitten that could exist in a user’s VR world, but were the density of the rods increased in future versions, more detailed and authentic-feeling shapes could be rendered. While it’s fascinating research even at this small scale, imagine an entire room with wall-to-wall undulating rods instead of a floor: The terrain inside a VR experience could be perfectly recreated under foot, allowing someone to physically climb over hills, debris, or other objects, enhancing the overall experience.

[Stanford Shape Lab via YouTube]

Tech

via Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com

April 27, 2018 at 04:51PM

Apple exits Wi-Fi game, AirPort routers discontinued after stock sells out

Apple exits Wi-Fi game, AirPort routers discontinued after stock sells out

https://ift.tt/2vXIvJM

Enlarge /

The AirPort Express was last updated in 2013.

Andrew Cunningham

After sitting in silence for years, Apple’s AirPort base station devices will fade away soon. According to a Bloomberg report, Apple is officially discontinuing the AirPort Extreme, AirPort Express, and Time Capsule Wi-Fi routers.

The company hasn’t updated any of the AirPort devices in nearly five years as it has focused more on other product categories. Apple will sell off its remaining inventory through Apple.com, Apple retail stores, and Apple authorized resellers “while supplies last.” The company will also continue to provide hardware and software support for AirPort customers for the time being.

In the two decades since the introduction of the AirPort family, the Wi-Fi world has changed quite a bit. Wireless networking wasn’t as ubiquitous then as it is now. Many customers now get wireless routers from Internet service providers, and those that are built into the providers’ hardware are typically good enough for most users.

There’s also a lot of competition in the high-end and mesh router world, with Google, Linksys, and Netgear all having their own options for power users. While Apple could dive back into the Wi-Fi router space in the future, the company is clearly focusing more on other categories at the moment, including the smart home space with HomeKit, augmented reality with ARKit, its smartphone lineup, and others.

Tech

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

April 27, 2018 at 09:16AM

‘Allegedly’ No More: Cosby Conviction Marks A New Chapter For #MeToo

‘Allegedly’ No More: Cosby Conviction Marks A New Chapter For #MeToo

https://ift.tt/2HvTgZj

Bill Cosby leaves the Montgomery County Courthouse in Norristown, Pa., on Thursday after being convicted of aggravated indecent assault.

Matt Slocum/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Matt Slocum/AP

Bill Cosby leaves the Montgomery County Courthouse in Norristown, Pa., on Thursday after being convicted of aggravated indecent assault.

Matt Slocum/AP

Finally, we no longer have to use the word “allegedly.”

A court of law has delivered a verdict that the court of public opinion seemed to have already reached: Bill Cosby, 80, has been found guilty of three counts of aggravated indecent assault, resulting from allegations first made by Andrea Constand back in 2005.

The public eventually saw more than 60 women accuse “America’s dad” of sexual misconduct and assault, with many alleging he surreptitiously drugged them first. This is the first of those stories to get a verdict.

In some ways, this feels like a new chapter in the #MeToo movement. It’s a lesson in how social media and changing attitudes can force the biggest superstars to reckon with behavior that was overlooked, even a dozen years ago. Back then, it seemed America had chosen to forget the subject completely: Cosby was a superstar known as an exemplar of propriety and moral values — the black comedy pioneer scolded other comics of color for cursing onstage and blasted some poor black people for their failures in judgment.

Then in 2014 Cosby attempted a major comeback tied to the 30th anniversary of his groundbreaking sitcom, The Cosby Show. He was developing a new sitcom with NBC, had a Netflix comedy special scheduled for release and had cooperated on a biography of his life, which did not address the assault allegations.

That’s when comic Hannibal Buress made a joke about the hypocrisy of Cosby scolding black people for letting their pants sag when he’d been accused of rape years ago. A cellphone video of that joke went viral, leading accuser Barbara Bowman to write an op-ed column for The Washington Post titled “Bill Cosby raped me. Why did it take 30 years for people to believe my story?

In 2015, Bowman told me about her decision to speak out against Cosby (she declined to comment for this story). “Shattering the silence had been my mission for 10 years,” she said. “… My entire motive was to motivate and empower other women to come forward to tell their stories as well.”

A few dynamics seemed to converge. Social media and online platforms helped spread word of the growing accusations against Cosby, moving beyond establishment media platforms the superstar could charm or intimidate. And younger people, like Buress, for whom The Cosby Show was a distant memory, didn’t see the comic as a venerated figure anymore.

His image as a philanthropist and pioneering black performer wasn’t enough to shield him as the allegations grew. So the TV projects went away, and eventually prosecutors decided to try him on criminal charges connected to Constand’s allegations.

Now Cosby presents the sharpest example yet of a lauded performer whose career ended with revelations of awful behavior. And we must all learn how to hold these two ideas in our heads at once: The first black man to co-star in a dramatic series on network TV (NBC’s I Spy), the first black person to win a prime time Emmy Award and the creator of beloved characters like Fat Albert and Cliff Huxtable, is also a convicted sexual predator.

For black folks, this is a particular blow. I still remember seeing posts from some African-American friends on social media years ago, insisting that these allegations against Cosby resurfaced because he had once made moves to buy NBC, and white power brokers wanted his legacy decimated. How could the man who literally wrote the books Fatherhood and Love and Marriage be guilty of this?

In some ways, it would be so much easier to believe this happened because of a conspiracy. Not only would it rescue the image of a man who stood for black achievement for many decades, but it would let fans off the hook, too. If Cosby was the target of a conspiracy, there would be no guilt in enjoying reruns of The Cosby Show, and mainstream America wouldn’t have to reckon with having turned away from the original allegations.

This won’t be the last we’ll hear of Cosby’s sexual past. His lawyers have vowed to appeal the conviction, and other women have filed civil suits of their own.

Still, as pop culture critics and onetime fans try to sort out Cosby’s legacy, it’s possible this all boils down to a simple message. What was once overlooked, will be overlooked no longer.

Which leaves one last question: Who’s next?

News

via NPR Topics: News https://ift.tt/2m0CM10

April 27, 2018 at 11:54AM