The Tesla Model X’s Sand Rollover Test Is Fascinating

The Tesla Model X’s Sand Rollover Test Is Fascinating

https://ift.tt/2ki07HY

Tesla tweeted out a video Sunday morning of its Tesla Model X rolling over after being shoved onto a sandbox by a sled. But even if the tweet read “…the first and only SUV to achieve a NHTSA 5-Star safety rating in every category…” this rollover isn’t the test conducted by the U.S. government, it seems to be a “Soil-Trip” rollover test done internally. Here’s how it works.

My coworkers and I were curious to learn more about this sandbox rollover test after seeing this video Tesla posted on Twitter:

I’ve reached out to Tesla to learn more, but even though they haven’t gotten back to me, a bit of research shows that this is not the government’s rollover test—which I’ll describe in a bit—but rather a “soil trip” test likely meant to simulate what would happen if the Model X left the road and slid sideways onto a soft surface like sand or dirt. (InsideEVs also describes this as an internal test.)

We don’t know how fast Tesla’s tests were conducted, but this 30 mph test of a 2003 Ford Expedition is pretty gnarly:

Such a test isn’t uncommon in the auto industry, with BMW showing off its crash test facility a few years back—a facility that included a sand pit for this very soil-trip test:

In a Siemens research paper on vehicle rollover protection, authors Linstromberg, Scholpp and Sherf describe a typical soil-trip test involving a “flying floor” ramming into energy-absorbing “deformation tubes,” writing:

The soil-trip rollover is a lateral movement of the car into a sand bed. The car is placed on a flying floor and slides laterally into the sand after a sharp deceleration of the sled with deformation tubes.

To describe why such a test is relevant, the report cites a 2003 SAE paper on the importance of various rollover tests in simulating real-world crashes—a paper whose abstract reads, in part:

Rollovers were most commonly induced when the lateral motion of the vehicle was suddenly slowed or stopped. This type of rollover mechanism is referred to as “trip-over”. Trip-overs accounted for 57% of passenger car and 51% of light truck vehicle (LTV) rollovers. More than 90% of trip-overs were initiated by ground contact.

The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration says that, according to its data, 95 percent of “single-vehicle rollovers” are tripped, with the organization including an animation of such a crash on its website, and describing how it occurs:

This happens when a vehicle leaves the roadway and slides sideways, digging its tires into soft soil or striking an object such as a curb or guardrail. The high tripping force applied to the tires in these situations can cause the vehicle to roll over.

So it seems like such a test makes sense if you really want to simulate the most likely real-world rollover conditions. What exactly Tesla is measuring with this test shown in the video, I’m unsure, but a paper written by Nissan Engineers for the Society for Automotive Engineers gives a clue of why an automaker might be conducting such a test.

According to the paper, automakers could use such a test to ensure compliance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 226, whose aim it is to reduce occupant ejection from cars during crashes.

Vehicle manufacturers have to define their own test procedures, because FMVSS 226 does not define any rollover test methods.The soil trip rollover test is a vehicle rollover test method in which a vehicle is propelled into a soil pool to measure its rollover characteristics.

So perhaps Tesla is testing out their occupant ejection mitigation tech, here. Or maybe not. Who knows. In either case, this test is very much not what got the Model X its five-star rating from NHTSA, because the feds running markedly different tests to get their rollover star-rating.

You can see the Tesla Model X’s rollover rating above: It’s five stars (thanks to that low-mounted battery pack), making it the only SUV to score top marks in all categories, according to a NHTSA representative. Under the rating, you’ll see a “rollover resistance” of 9.3 percent and a dynamic tip result of “No Tip.”

The tests done to come up with these results are not what’s shown in Tesla’s video. In fact, NHTSA’s “Rollover Resistance” percentage isn’t really the result of a crash test. It stems from something called the “Static Stability Factor,” which is based on two geometric measurements: track width and vehicle center of gravity:

Measuring the track width, T, is fairly straightforward, with the test facility using two “Tire Edge Determination Tools” and a tape measure, with the final result being the average of a bunch of different track width measurements to minimize error.

The center of gravity, H, of the vehicle is a little more complex, requiring the vehicle to be driven or loaded onto a pendulum device like a “Vehicle Inertia Measurement Facility.” Here’s NHTSA’s full description of how this H value is determined:

The platform is connected to a pivot that is above the combined vehicle and platform center-of-gravity height. The platform and vehicle are then tilted in a stable manner by applying known weights at either end of the platform. Detailed error analyses have indicated that this method provides very good results for H measurement?

Once researchers have T and H, that’s all that’s needed to come up with a Static Stability Factory, an “at-rest laboratory measurement” that NHTSA says is an indicator of how top-heavy a vehicle is.

For a while, NHTSA’s rollover rating was based solely on this geometry-based calculation, but in 2004, the feds added the “dynamic tip result” that you see under the Model X’s five-star rating. That came about after Congress asked NHTSA to devise a dynamic test in the “Transportation Recall, Enhancement, Accountability and Documentation (TREAD) Act of November 2000.”

What NHTSA came up with was the “Fishhook” test, which is meant to represent an avoidance maneuver done at speeds up to 50 mph, with The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety describing it in their contemporary press release, saying:

Under the new rating system, a vehicle can improve its score based on static measurements if it successfully undergoes the fishhook maneuver without tipping up on two wheels. Vehicles are tested with a simulated five-passenger load starting at 35 mph and then in 5 mph increments up to a maximum of 50 mph.

Here’s IIHS’s graphic of how the current government rollover test works by including both the static stability factor and the fishhook maneuver:

In any case, while it’s not a government-mandated test but an internal one and while Tesla’s tweet sort of implies that one relates to the other, the Model X inarguably fares pretty well. I’d rather be in that than the Explorer, government test or internal one.

I’ll update this post if Tesla gets back to us on the details of the test.

Tech

via Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com

May 22, 2018 at 12:15PM

Xfinity website bug revealed home addresses and Wi-Fi passwords

Xfinity website bug revealed home addresses and Wi-Fi passwords

https://ift.tt/2s42BNC


RiverNorthPhotography via Getty Images

This week, ZDNet reported that a Comcast website used to activate Xfinity routers was leaking personal data, including a person’s home address, the name of the Wi-Fi network and password. This bug was first uncovered by two researchers, Karan Saini and Ryan Stevenson.

Saini and Stevenson found that they only needed a customer ID and house or apartment number (not the full address) in order to force the website to deliver the information. This, in spite of the fact that the form did request a full address. This information can be obtained from a discarded bill, or if an attacker only has the ID, they can guess a house/apartment number.

ZDNet was able to confirm that the bug indeed returned home addresses, as well as Wi-Fi username and password information in plain text. For one user they tested who didn’t use Xfinity’s router, the website returned the home address but not the username or password of the Wi-Fi network (another reason to always use your own router). If this wasn’t bad enough, it’s possible someone could have used this method to rename a Wi-Fi network or change the password, locking someone out of their own network.

Comcast is aware of the issue and has removed the option from its website. “There’s nothing more important than our customers’ security,” a Comcast spokesperson told ZDNet. “Within hours of learning of this issue, we shut it down. We are conducting a thorough investigation and will take all necessary steps to ensure that this doesn’t happen again.” Still, considering that the service just introduced its mesh routers last night, the timing of this discovery isn’t great. It’s good that the company acted quickly, but it doesn’t change the fact that this breach of security happened in the first place.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

May 22, 2018 at 12:18PM

A ‘Solid’ Idea for Powering Spacecraft: Thermoacoustics

A ‘Solid’ Idea for Powering Spacecraft: Thermoacoustics

https://ift.tt/2IXvaGV

Billy Hurley, Digital Editorial Manager

Applying heat to a liquid or gas will cause the spontaneous generation of sound waves – a thermoacoustic power that has long supported machines like engines and refrigerators.

At the 175th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, researchers from Purdue University demonstrated that thermoacoustics properties could theoretically occur in solids too.

Temperature gradients, when applied to liquids, produce waste heat or mechanical vibrations that be converted into other useful forms of energy.

Refrigerators, for example, use vibrating motion to make cold areas colder and warm areas warmer. Waste heat generates the necessary mechanical vibrations for engines.

The thermoacoustics machines, however, have been fluid-based.

The Purdue researchers developed a theoretical model – a solid one – demonstrating that a thin metal rod exhibits self-sustained mechanical vibrations when a temperature gradient is periodically applied.

According to the team, the solids can be engineered to achieve necessary thermoacoustics performance.

“Fluids do not allow us to do this,” said lead researcher and Purdue assistant professor of mechanical engineering Fabio Semperlotti.

Like fluids, the solids were shown to contract when cooled down, and expand when heated. If the solid contracts less when cooled and expands more when heated, the resulting motion will increase over time.

Semperlotti spoke with Tech Briefs about why his concept is a solid one, perhaps especially for applications in space.

Tech Briefs: Regarding an engine, what are the advantages of solids vs. fluids?

Semperlotti: Material properties of solids are much more controllable and “tailorable” than fluids: one can think of engineering the structure of a solid to meet certain design constraints (particularly, sound and thermal transport properties) – doing the same with a fluid is much more difficult, if not unfeasible most of the times.

Tech Briefs: In what settings do you envision this kind of solid-based design being most valuable?

Semperlotti: We envision using these systems for low-power niche applications. This is mostly a system for the use of waste (or low-grade) thermal energy. Ideal applications for this technology involve scenarios where large temperature gradients are available and where the reliability of the energy conversion system is critical. As an example, this technology could be a viable candidate to build low-power on-board electric generators for space systems, such as satellites or orbiting stations. The large thermal gradients available in space together with the need for long-lasting and ultra-reliable systems could make this technology very competitive in this market.

Researchers envision thermoacoustics in solids eventually harnessing the extreme temperature gradient of outer space for electricity on satellites. (Image Credit: Purdue University/Mo Lifton)

Tech Briefs: What inspired this idea?

Semperlotti: Fluid-based thermoacoustic engines have been studied and developed for several decades. The concept of a solid-state engine operating on a similar principle appeared a reasonable extension given that waves in solids are governed by physical laws mathematically similar to the ones of fluids dynamics.

Tech Briefs: How do you envision this technology progressing?

Semperlotti: We envision the future of this technology going hand in hand with materials specifically designed to achieve optimal properties for thermoacoustic energy conversion. The rapid development of additive manufacturing capabilities suggests that this scenario could be in reach in the very near future.

There are also some other advantages that could be useful for specific applications. A solid-state thermoacoustic engine not only does not have any part in motion, but does not need any fluid that could eventually leak and reduce the operating life of the device.

Tech Briefs: Why do you think this idea hasn’t been tried before?

Semperlotti: In general, it is not natural to think of a solid as the ideal medium to obtain motion from static energy sources, like a thermal gradient. In addition, there are some drawbacks of solids compared to fluids. The response of fluids to thermal gradients is stronger than in solids (i.e., their thermoelastic response) and the mechanical energy dissipation is lower. Also, the experimental verification in solids is still a challenging task because it requires the implementation of simultaneous thermal and mechanical boundary conditions that are not easy to achieve.

Tech Briefs: What’s most exciting to you about this research and the possibilities?

Semperlotti: The idea that – after more than a century of thermoacoustics – there are still new treasures to be discovered is very exciting. At the same time, we believe that this idea can open a complete new range of applications, and we are excited to see what kind of applications the community will explore. In fact, we do not think of this technology as a replacement of fluid-based thermoacoustics, but instead as something that will complement it.

Tech Briefs: What’s next regarding your research?

Semperlotti: Time will tell. The idea was well received at the recent ASA conference in Minneapolis, MN. After all, fluid-based thermoacoustic devices are sufficiently mature technologies, so envisioning a fully solid-state implementation is quite reasonable.

At this stage, our study did not produce an experimental validation yet. This is the most important next step in order to bring the community on board with this concept. Once the concept is experimentally validated, we will work on integrating this technology in practical solid-state devices and – why not? – maybe testing this technology in space.

What do you think? Will solid-based thermoacoustics be used to someday power spacecraft? Share your questions and comments below.

Semperlotti developed the research with Professor Mihir Sen from the University of Notre Dame; Carlo Scalo, an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Purdue; and Purdue graduate research assistant Haitian Hao.

Tech

via NASA Tech Briefs https://ift.tt/2BVPq4O

May 21, 2018 at 02:47PM

Little Kids Demonstrating Their Very Impressive Transformer Costumes

Little Kids Demonstrating Their Very Impressive Transformer Costumes

https://ift.tt/2ID3IPe

kids-transformer-costumes.jpg

This is a video of three young kids demonstrating their surprisingly impressive Transformer costumes. In the mix are Optimus Prime, Starscream (one of my favorites) and Bumblebee. They take a little while to get ready to transform and roll out (skip to 0:30), but once they do, it’s a treat. Now if only the person filming could have just transformed their phone from portrait to landscape mode. It’s kind of crazy to think about — they took what could have been a rock-solid video, and almost rendered it unwatchable. Did they ever stop to think about all the panning they were having to do? And like, maybe there’s an easy fix for that? “Obviously not.” Obviously. I’m so mad I could spit. *spits* “That’s a lot of blood, GW.” I think my stomach is bleeding.

Keep going for the video, complete with ridiculous zoomed sidebars because somebody was clearly determined to make an already bad video even worse.

Thanks to Alan, who’d like to think if G.I. Joe cartoons were still made today, there would be always be a don’t film in portrait mode PSA at the end of every episode.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Tech

via Geekologie – Gadgets, Gizmos, and Awesome http://geekologie.com/

May 21, 2018 at 04:21PM

Amazon is in talks to resurrect ‘The Expanse’

Amazon is in talks to resurrect ‘The Expanse’

https://ift.tt/2kcvxPG


Rafy/Syfy

Just because Syfy dropped The Expanse doesn’t mean the cult sci-fi hit has met its end. Sources talking to Deadline, Variety and Hollywood Reporter have all claimed that Amazon is in discussions to resurrect The Expanse for a fourth season. Neither Amazon nor show producer Alcon are commenting on the rumor, but Deadline heard there’s “interest” in the move. The tricky part would be negotiating a deal — it’s more complex than you might think.

Amazon has the on-demand streaming rights to The Expanse in North America. However, its arch-nemesis Netflix offers the show beyond North America and New Zealand. It would either have to find a way to take greater control of distribution, limit new seasons to just a few countries or accept that it would support a competitor.

It’s not shocking that negotiations might take place when Alcon was shopping the show around to other networks — broadcasters are eager to pick up others’ programming these days. Amazon is potentially a good fit, though, and not just because Expanse fans have been campaigning for a deal. The internet behemoth has been pushing for blockbuster shows, and a well-received sci-fi series might just do the job. Moreover, genre shows like this tend to thrive more on streaming than on live broadcasts (Syfy’s arrangement revolved heavily around live audiences). If Amazon picks up The Expanse, the series might have a considerably better home than it did on conventional TV.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

May 21, 2018 at 06:36PM

Hell Yeah, Favoriting Photos Comes to Google Photos

Hell Yeah, Favoriting Photos Comes to Google Photos

https://ift.tt/2IGLPeA

google photos

Even though Google Photos is about the best app to be released in four or five years, thanks to all of its smarts like searching, sometimes a curated listed made by you is even more powerful than the computer behind the scenes. This week, that’s arriving in the form of a favorite button that has begun rolling out.

With this new favorite button, you’ll see a star icon within photos attached to your account. If you tap that star, you’ll add items to a separate Favorite album that can be accessed within the Albums section.

This could be a great place to add the best pictures you’ve taken in the simplest form. Let us know if you see it show up!

Google Play Link

Hell Yeah, Favoriting Photos Comes to Google Photos is a post from: Droid Life

Tech

via Droid Life: A Droid Community Blog https://ift.tt/2dLq79c

May 21, 2018 at 05:45PM

Orlando Police Testing Amazon’s Real-Time Facial Recognition

Orlando Police Testing Amazon’s Real-Time Facial Recognition

https://ift.tt/2s2kaO0

Tech companies are trying to sell police real-time facial recognition systems, which can track and identify people as they walk down the street. As NPR reported two weeks ago, American police have generally held off, but there’s new evidence that one police department — Orlando, Fla. — has decided to try it out.

What’s more, Orlando ordered its facial recognition system from Amazon.

This information was uncovered by the ACLU, which noticed that law enforcement customers were mentioned in the marketing of Amazon’s “Rekognition” service. Until now, American police have used facial recognition primarily to compare still photos from crime scenes with mug shots. But now Amazon and Orlando are taking it further, by using facial recognition to spot people in real time.

“City of Orlando is a launch partner of ours,” Amazon’s Ranju Das recently told a developer conference in Seoul, South Korea. “They have cameras all over the city. The authorized cameras are then streaming the data … we are a subscriber to the stream, we analyze the video in real time, search against the collection of faces they have.”

In his presentation, Das said the system can be set up to notify the city if cameras see a “person of interest,” and it could be used to reconstruct a person’s past movements. He showed the conference a demo of real-time facial recognition using video from a “traffic cam that was provided by the city of Orlando.”

In a written statement, the Orlando Police Department called the Amazon facial recognition system a “pilot program” and said it “will be used in accordance with current and applicable law.”

The statement also says the department “is not using the technology in an investigative capacity or in any public spaces at this time.”

It did not say whether the system has been used that way in the past, or will be in the future. NPR tried to follow up, but OPD said it wasn’t doing interviews on the topic.

Amazon also wouldn’t do an interview with NPR. In a written statement, it pointed out that its visual analytics tools have a wide range of applications beyond policing, and that “[o]ur quality of life would be much worse today if we outlawed new technology because some people could choose to abuse the technology. Imagine if customers couldn’t buy a computer because it was possible to use that computer for illegal purposes?”

Amazon’s statement added, “[W]e require our customers to comply with the law and be responsible when using Amazon Rekognition.”

There are no laws explicitly barring law enforcement from using real-time facial recognition, and the constitutionality has not been tested by higher courts.

Matt Cagle of the ACLU of Northern California says he’s disturbed by what he sees as a lack of transparency and public engagement, as police and tech companies work together to bring this new tool to American streets.

“Amazon is handing governments a surveillance system primed for abuse,” Cagle says. “And that’s why we’re blowing the whistle right now.”

The ACLU filed public records requests for Amazon’s communications with Orlando and another Rekognition customer, the Washington County Sheriff’s Office, near Portland, Ore. Cagle says the resulting documents show a company eager to push law enforcement customers toward real-time facial recognition and connect it to other devices, such as officer body cameras.

This is typical of companies that sell facial recognition. Most try to encourage customers to expand the applications and powers of the technology. What makes Amazon’s offering different is the price.

“We pay literally a couple of dollars a month to do this service,” says Washington County Sheriff’s Office spokesman Deputy Jeff Talbot. His department uses Amazon’s Rekognition to scan faces in photos of suspects taken by deputies in the field.

“They’ve created a little tool where you upload and it sends you your results and you can continue your investigation,” he says.

In the past, police departments had to pay tens of thousands of dollars for facial recognition systems, provided by traditional vendors such as NEC. Now Amazon is offering police something similar for a fraction.

The Washington County Sheriff’s Office says it does not use Rekognition in real time and doesn’t intend to.

Cagle says that could easily change. The marketing of Rekognition to law enforcement is still in its infancy, but he’s worried it could quickly become dominant, given Amazon’s market clout as the world’s leading cloud services company.

“Activating a real-time facial recognition system, that can track people, if the technology is there, could be as simple as flipping a switch in some communities,” Cagle says.

News

via NPR Topics: News https://ift.tt/2m0CM10

May 22, 2018 at 09:10AM