A new study from the American League of Cyclists studies what killed cyclists and who was responsible.
from Latest Items from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/1r0Ef3b
via IFTTT
For everything from family to computers…
A new study from the American League of Cyclists studies what killed cyclists and who was responsible.
from Latest Items from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/1r0Ef3b
via IFTTT
A new study has found that eating powdered food for weeks on end gave mice higher blood pressure, higher levels of glucose in the blood, and higher levels of certain hormones in the blood. That’s compared to mice who ate the exact same food, only their food was in pellets, not crushed into a powder.
This study is one of the few to examine what happens when lab animals never chew, according to the author’s of the study, published this month in the journal Life Sciences. I believe it. I searched and found very few studies of eating without chewing. That’s probably because by the time most people end up taking their meals in powder form, they don’t have much of an alternative, anyway.
One exception, of course, are those who might be tempted to try living on Soylent. [Here’s another exception. -Ed.] Around this time last year, word spread of a liquid meal software engineer Rob Rhinehart had come up with. It’s made mostly of powders, blended into a drink he called Soylent. Soylent has all the nutrients the human body needs, Rhinehart claimed. Nothing more and nothing less. He consumed only Soylent for a month, then wrote about how it gave him more energy and helped him lose weight.
At that time, I talked with some nutritionists about Soylent. The answers they gave me weren’t that exciting. Soylent is probably missing a few things science isn’t yet aware the human body needs. But it’s also probably okay for you. Throughout history, humans have survived on worse. Nobody really knows what will happen if a healthy person chooses to consume a non-chewable diet, in part because it’s not well studied. Well, here is a mouse study that offers some starting hints on the potential consequences.
For the study, oral-health researchers at Tohoku University in Japan performed a series of experiments. In one experiment, they fed eight mice powdered food, and eight mice, solid food, for three days. Blood glucose measurements in those mice suggested the mice’s bodies absorbed nutrients much faster from the powdered food than the solid stuff.
In another set of experiments, researchers gave powdered mouse chow to eight from the time they were weaned until the researchers dissected the mice at age 20 weeks. Eight other mice ate normal mouse pellets during that time.
Besides their higher blood pressure and blood glucose levels, the mice that ate powdered food for 17 weeks (it takes three weeks to wean a mouse) had lower levels of insulin in their blood. They had higher levels of the hormones adrenaline, noradrenaline and corticosterone. But both sets of mice were able to maintain steady blood sugar levels after a big meal, neither was heavier than the other, and both had the same heart rates.
What’s a Soylent dabbler to think? There’s some precedent for thinking that chewing solids alters the way the body handles food. Chewing by itself kicks off a little insulin production, presumably because the body is preparing for food. Here’s a study that found a link between the hardness of the food people ate and their waist sizes, although not their body-mass indices. And here’s a study that found links between how well people chewed their meals and their glucose and insulin blood levels after their meals. Not much, right? When it comes to non-chewing, you’re in uncharted territory.
from Popular Science http://ift.tt/Stv5wv
via IFTTT
TheLadders conducted a study tracking the eye movements of recruiters when looking at resumes (online and off) and LinkedIn profiles. Besides revealing that recruiters only look at resumes for about six seconds , the study also points out the most important areas job seekers should focus on.
from Lifehacker http://ift.tt/1jKqTUw
via IFTTT
Short of solving world hunger, there doesn’t seem to be much LEDs aren’t good at. They’re a far superior alternative to incandescent and even fluorescent lights, and given they’re so small and indestructible, they can be used in incredibly unique lighting products like these flexible, roll-up studio lights.
from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/1gWXAOs
via IFTTT
I noticed that this article
was being passed around again, so I watched the video once more. I forgot how amazingly good it is—so here it is again for your viewing pleasure: The definitive proof of why the moon landings could have never been faked:
from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/1kymnaA
via IFTTT
Trial lawyers and pharma companies teamed up to stop change to patent laws.
from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/1m3nttf
via IFTTT
622Mbps down and 19Mbps up isn’t bad, but the lag…
from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/1txAP5F
via IFTTT