Your Vape Litter Is Becoming an Environmental Disaster

https://earther.gizmodo.com/your-vape-litter-is-becoming-an-environmental-disaster-1839226689

Anyone who’s participated in a beach cleanup is familiar with the classic cup of cigarette butts. The collection of nasty, soggy, chemically remains of cigarettes is the top item—often numbering in the thousands per cleanup—found in the sand in many parts of the U.S. along with other bits of plastic pollution.

But habits are changing, and so too is the waste that goes with them. While people participating in beach cleanups across the U.S. this summer still found butts, they also noticed that pods from Juuls and other vapes are becoming a new menace. Patrick Diamond, vice chair of Surfrider NYC, told Earther in an email that while he hasn’t kept specific statistics, vape paraphernalia is “now joining cigarette butts and other items as beach trash and plastic pollution which means they will make their way into the ocean as more plastic pollution.”

Public health has become a primary concern with vaping this year. The CDC has confirmed 33 deaths in 24 states from illnesses related to vaping while another 1,500 lung injuries have been reported. Many of the victims reported using THC, though some reported only vaping nicotine. But there are growing signs that vape pods and pens could become a huge environmental issue as well, creating a whole new stream of plastic and electronic waste just as public perception—if not actual practice—seems to be turning against plastic.

“It’s not like you’re doing less damage to the world by vaping vs. smoking,” Yogi Hale Hendlin, an environmental philosopher at University of California, San Francisco who’s been studying the issue extensively, told Earther. “I think a lot of vapers are under that misconception.”

Juul pods have quickly become the new cigarette butts and not just on the beach. They can be found joining blowing plastic bags and loose candy wrappers in the feral trash of urban landscapes. They’re small, cheap, and easily left behind on tables, bus seats, or the sidewalk. There’s even an unfortunate meme encouraging users to throw their full devices out the window or into the ocean in response to the health concerns, underscoring how disposable the devices seem.

Juul—which cigarette kingpin Altria bought a 35 percent stake in last year—dominates the vape product market, with 16.2 million devices sold in 2017 alone. That makes up 70 percent of the overall market. The company reported selling 175 million refill pod kits in the first quarter of this year alone, a huge increase from 64 million sold the same period the previous year. Each refill contains two to four pods, so that’s easily over a billion and as many as two billion little squares of plastic going into the trash each year. Lined up, those discarded pods would easily stretch from New York to Los Angeles.

Users can hardly be blamed because most vaping companies don’t offer any alternative. The devices are e-waste, and the pods are made of hard plastic that can’t be recycled or reused. It’s part of what environmentalists say is a larger problem at the intersection of capitalism and tech: Companies can introduce products into the market with no concern of how to close the loop on disposing of them. At best, this foists the cost of disposal, clean up, and recycling onto the user—or the non-vaping taxpayer.

The environmental footprint of vaping is tied to both the pods and e-cigarettes themselves. The plastic pods will basically never biodegrade. But they and other vape products are also complicated pieces of e-waste, though users often confuse them for something disposable.

Consider the pod: You vape a whole cartridge and want to dispose of it. The Juul packaging contains no info on how to do this, so you consider throwing it in the plastic recycling. Except pods can’t be recycled with household plastic because the nicotine is toxic, which means the pods are essentially hazardous waste.

Juul vaguely directs users to take the pods to an e-waste facility, but those facilities actually don’t know what to do with them either. Earther called e-waste facilities in Brooklyn, San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, and New Orleans but none said they accepted the pods (New Orleans does have a recycling option for Mardis Gras beads, however). Most said they only accept things with circuit boards, which Juul pods do not have; several said they were not even familiar with the pods and had to check on if they took them in the first place.

On top of that, we already are drowning in so much plastic as to make recycling functionally impossible. An informal survey of a handful of Juul users I conducted confirmed that most trash them. Even a vape shop owner gave me the same advice.

If you Google “recycle Juul pods,” you will likely find a site called Autopods, a would-be recycling service that New Yorker Mohamed Allam started early this year after noticing “an insane amount of empty pods” littering the city streets. Allam told Earther he tried to set up a mail-in recycling program where users get 5 cents per pod. But, as you may imagine, millennials hate mail, so participation has been low.

On top of that, Allam hasn’t actually been able to figure out what to do with the pods. The pods are unsanitary and the coils erode over time, he said, so they were no good for refilling and reuse. Autopods ended up using the empty pods for art, putting them together like Lego pieces.

“A little bit of glue, creativity and patience and you have a recycled piece of art,” Allam said.

It’s hardly a long-term solution, but it beats throwing them in the ocean.

The devices themselves are potentially more hazardous. Juuls along with a growing number of vape pens are designed to be sleek and discreet. That can also make them almost seem disposable, so people don’t consider them e-waste. Some just toss them in the trash (one user told me he specifically threw his device in a public trashcan so he wouldn’t be tempted to pull it out and start using it again). Yet vape pens are anything but regular trash.

“E-cigs, in terms of their composition, are much more like our smartphones than they are like a traditional cigarette,” Hendlin said. “They have complex computer circuitry, they have hard plastics, they have all these heavy metals in them and lithium ion batteries that are about the same size as our smartphones.”

Juul’s website tells users to check their city’s recommendations for dealing with a lithium-polymer rechargeable battery as does Vuse, another popular brand. A Juul spokesman told Earther the company is piloting a takeback and recycling program at some of its office locations “to ensure we develop effective, innovative and sustainable solutions.” In addition, he said the company is working with “a number of organizations and potential partners to advance our environmental sustainability efforts” but would not provide more details on either initiative.

Giving consumers such open-ended instructions just doesn’t work, said Judith Enck, a regional director of the Environmental Protection Agency during the Obama administration who now works on tackling plastic pollution at Bennington College.

“Most communities do not have easy to access electronic waste return programs. I’m extremely concerned about the millions of tiny lithium ion batteries that are littered or sent to incinerators or landfills,” she told Earther. “The rules on electronic waste are very confusing in a lot of communities. I seriously doubt most consumers are holding onto these devices and collecting them and bringing them [to a facility].”

These compounding environmental woes may seem like something vaping companies should have thought of before they launched, but the vapor is already out of the cartridge on that. That puts the burden on regulatory agencies to decide what to do with mounting vape-related waste.

Enck said state governments should adopt laws that put a mandatory deposit on the devices (say, $5) so people would be more likely to dispose of them properly. It would be similar to bottle-deposit laws that encourage recycling.

“You should be able to return them to wherever you bought the product,” she said. “Then the Juul company needs to invest in their reuse and recycling program.”

Hendlin agreed and said a $1 deposit on pods could even lead to a de facto cleanup program as people pick through the trash and gutters—though relying on homeless and low-income people to provide municipal waste management is its own kind of dystopian scenario. The truth is that without any economic incentive or government mandate, people will just keep throwing them in the trash because it’s easier.

“You have to have some sort of external oversight,” Hendelin said, citing the history of single-use plastics and wasteful shipping packaging, the disposal of which companies have foisted on consumers. “We’ve learned our lesson in history from that one.”

Of course, you could always just quit.

via Gizmodo https://gizmodo.com

October 24, 2019 at 11:09AM

How memes got weaponized: A short history

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/614572/political-war-memes-disinformation/

In October 2016, a friend of mine learned that one of his wedding photos had made its way into a post on a right-wing message board. The picture had been doctored to look like an ad for Hillary Clinton’s campaign, and appeared to endorse the idea of drafting women into the military. A mutual friend of ours found the image first and sent him a message: “Ummm, I saw this on Reddit, did you make this?”

This was the first my friend had heard of it. He hadn’t agreed to the use of his image, which was apparently taken from his online wedding album. But he also felt there was nothing he could do to stop it.

So rather than poke the trolls by complaining, he ignored it and went on with his life. Most of his friends had a laugh at the fake ad, but I saw a huge problem. As a researcher of media manipulation and disinformation, I understood right away that my friend had become cannon fodder in a “meme war”—the use of slogans, images, and video on social media for political purposes, often employing disinformation and half-truths.

While today we tend to think of memes as funny images online, Richard Dawkins coined the term back in 1976 in his book The Selfish Gene, where he described how culture is transmitted through generations. In his definition, memes are “units of culture” spread through the diffusion of ideas. Memes are particularly salient online because the internet crystallizes them as artifacts of communication and accelerates their distribution through subcultures.

Importantly, as memes are shared they shed the context of their creation, along with their authorship. Unmoored from the trappings of an author’s reputation or intention, they become the collective property of the culture. As such, memes take on a life of their own, and no one has to answer for transgressive or hateful ideas.

And while a lot of people think of memes as harmless entertainment—funny, snarky comments on current events—we’re far beyond that now. Meme wars are a consistent feature of our politics, and they’re not just being used by internet trolls or some bored kids in the basement, but by governments, political candidates, and activists across the globe. Russia used memes and other social-media tricks to influence the US election in 2016, using a troll farm known as the Internet Research Agency to seed pro-Trump and anti-Clinton content across various online platforms. Both sides in territorial conflicts like those between Hong Kong and China, Gaza and Israel, and India and Pakistan are using memes and viral propaganda to sway both local and international sentiment.

In 2007, for example, as he was campaigning for president, John McCain jokingly started to sing “Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran” to the tune of the Beach Boys’ popular song “Barbara Ann.” McCain, an Iran hawk, was talking up a possible war using the well-worn tactic of humor and familiarity: easy to dismiss as a joke, yet serving as a scary reminder of US military power. But it became a political liability for him. The slogan was picked up by civilian meme-makers, who spread and adapted it until it went viral. His opponent, Barack Obama, in essence got unpaid support from people who were better at creating persuasive content than his own campaign staff.

The viral success of memes has led governments to try imitating the genre in their propaganda. These campaigns are often aimed at the young, like the US Army’s social-media-focused “Warriors Wanted” program, or the British Army campaign that borrows the visual language of century-old recruiting posters to make fun of millennial stereotypes. These drew ridicule when they were launched earlier this year, but they did boost recruitment.

However, using memes this way misses the point entirely. As mentioned, great memes are authorless. They move about the culture without attribution.

Much more authentic military meme campaigns are coming from soldiers themselves, such as the memes referencing the bungling idiot known simply as “Carl.” US service members and veterans run websites that host jokes and images detailing the reality of military life. Yet these serve a purpose not so different from that of official propaganda. They often feature heavily armed soldiers and serve to highlight, even in jokes, the tremendous destructive capacity of the armed forces. In turn, such memes have been turned into commercial marketing campaigns, such as one for the veteran-owned clothing company Valhalla Wear.

Recognizing this power of memes generated by ordinary people to serve a state’s propaganda narrative, in 2005 a Marine Corps major named Michael Prosser wrote a master’s thesis titled “Memetics—A Growth Industry in US Military Operations,” in which he called for the formation of a meme warfare center that would enroll people to produce and share memes as a way of swaying public opinion.

Prosser’s idea didn’t come to fruition, but the US government did come to recognize memetics as a threat. Beginning in 2011, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency offered $42 million in grants for research into what it called “social media in strategic communications,” with the hope that the government could detect “purposeful or deceptive messaging and misinformation” and create countermessaging to fight it.

Yet that research didn’t prepare DARPA for Russia’s 2016 disinformation campaign. Its extent was uncovered only by reporters and academics. That revealed a fatal flaw in national security: foreign agents are nearly impossible to detect when they hide within the civilian population. Unless social-media companies cooperate with the state to monitor attacks, this tactic remains in play.

My friend’s wedding photo provides a good illustration of how something as seemingly trivial as a meme can be turned into a powerful political weapon. In 2016, a Reddit message board, r/The_Donald, was a well-known meme factory for all things Trump. Imagery and sloganeering were beta-tested and refined there before being deployed by swarms of accounts on social-media platforms. Famous viral slogans launched from The_Donald included those having to do with “Pizzagate” and the Seth Rich murder conspiracy.

My friend’s picture was appropriated for a memetic warfare operation called #DraftMyWife or #DraftOurDaughters, which aimed to falsely associate Hillary Clinton with a revival of the draft. The strategy was simple: the perpetrators took imagery from Clinton’s official digital campaign materials, as well as pictures online like my friend’s, and altered them to make it look as if Clinton would draft women into the military if she became president. Someone who saw one of these fake campaign ads and then searched online would find that Clinton had in fact spoken in June 2016 in support of a bill that included a provision making women eligible to be drafted—but only in case of a national emergency. The bill was passed, but it was later changed to remove that requirement. This is what made #DraftMyWife sneaky—it was based on a kernel of truth.

Memes like this often use a process called “trading up the chain,” pioneered by media entrepreneur Ryan Holiday, who describes the method in his book Trust Me, I’m Lying. Campaigns begin with posts in blogs or other news outlets with low standards. If all goes well, somebody notable will inadvertently spread the disinformation by tweet, which then leads to coverage in bigger and more reputable outlets. #DraftMyWife was outed fairly early on as a hoax and got debunked in the Washington Post, the Guardian, and elsewhere. The problem is, taking the trouble to correct disinformation campaigns like these can satisfy the goal of spreading the meme as far as possible—a process called amplification.

Memes online make hoaxes and psychological operations easy to pull off on an international scale. We should view them as a serious threat. The good news is that a bill in the works in the US Congress would form a national commission to assess the threat posed by foreign and domestic actors manipulating social media to cause harm.

Just focusing on those actors misses the point, though, for much the same reason those meme-inspired military recruiting campaigns missed the point. Memetic warfare works only if those waging it can rely on massive public participation to spread the memes and obscure their original authors. So rather than going after the meme creators, politicians and institutions looking to counter meme war might do better to strengthen the institutions that create and distribute reliable information—the media, academia, nonpartisan government agencies, and so on—while US cyber-defense works with the platform companies to root out influence operations.

And if that doesn’t work, blame Carl.

Joan Donovan is a researcher at the Shorenstein Center for Media, Politics, and Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government.

via Technology Review Feed – Tech Review Top Stories https://ift.tt/1XdUwhl

October 24, 2019 at 06:12AM

The Morning After: Google claims ‘quantum supremacy’

https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/24/the-morning-after/

Hey, good morning! You look fabulous.

Get some coffee — we’re talking about quantum computing. If you need something a little lighter, there’s also Huawei’s folding phone and a quick preview of the content coming to Netflix in November.


Congratulations! What does that mean?Google says it’s achieved quantum supremacy

Google is standing by its claim that it’s achieved quantum supremacy — marking a major milestone in computing research. Word of the breakthrough leaked in September, and despite dispute from some competitors, scientific journal Nature has now published Google’s research paper.

The paper explains how its 53-bit quantum computer — named Sycamore — took just 200 seconds to perform a calculation that would have taken the world’s fastest supercomputer 10,000 years. According to Google CEO Sundar Pichai, "We can think about today’s news in the context of building the first rocket that successfully left Earth’s gravity to touch the edge of space." The only problem? Whether you think it qualifies for the title or not, the feat has no practical use — yet.


More flexible phones.Huawei will finally release its $2,400 Mate X phone on November 15th

After multiple delays, Huawei’s foldable Mate X is nearly ready for launch — but only in its homeland. Huawei is launching the phone in China on November 15th for ¥16,999, or roughly $2,400. And you thought the Galaxy Fold was pricey.


Get ready for a new flagship DSLR from Canon.Canon’s EOS 1D X Mark III will be a technological tour de force

Canon has announced the development of its next flagship professional DSLR, the EOS-1D X Mark III. It will hit shooting speeds of up to 16 fps with autofocus through the optical viewfinder (mechanical shutter) and 20 fps in live view mode (mechanical or electronic shutter). Along with JPEG and RAW files, users will get a new type of format called 10-bit HEIF (high efficiency image file), with more dynamic range and a wider color palette than JPEG. It’s an option that’s much more compact than RAW, but easier to edit than JPEG.

This is also meant to be the most video-capable EOS camera ever, with new algorithms and AI tech improving autofocus. What we don’t know yet is when it’ll arrive and how much it’ll cost.


If you dare.Watch the first teaser for Netflix’s CG ‘Ghost in the Shell’ series

A word of warning: If you have fond memories of Mamoru Oshii’s two Ghost in the Shell movies, you may want to avert your eyes. Of several anime trailers Netflix released Wednesday, the one for Ghost in the Shell: SAC_2045 is the only one that has nearly as many dislikes on YouTube as it does likes. A lot of that has to do with the 3DCG animation style on display in the trailer, which, it’s fair to say, fans have responded to divisively.


A big free update, Wastelanders, has been pushed back to the first quarter of 2020.Bethesda hopes you’ll pay $100 a year for private ‘Fallout 76’ worlds

The developer has launched a Fallout 1st subscription that offers a few exclusive conveniences and other perks for $100 per year or $13 per month. Most notably, 1st members can create private worlds for them and up to seven other people. You don’t have to worry that a troublemaker will come in and ruin your experience, in other words.

But wait, there’s more…


The Morning After is a new daily newsletter from Engadget designed to help you fight off FOMO. Who knows what you’ll miss if you don’t Subscribe.

Craving even more? Like us on Facebook or Follow us on Twitter.

Have a suggestion on how we can improve The Morning After? Send us a note.

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

October 24, 2019 at 06:24AM

Bollinger Motors reveals the price of its hand-built EVs—$125,000

https://arstechnica.com/?p=1590671

  • The Bollinger B1 electric SUV goes into production in 2020, and the 125kWh version will cost $125,000 before any tax credits or incentives.

    Bollinger

  • The B2 electric pickup is identical under the skin, and the same price.

    Bollinger

  • Because the Bollinger BEVs are rated for a 10,001lb gross vehicle weight, they don’t need to conform to light passenger vehicle rules so there are no airbags in here.

    Bollinger

  • The platform features a completely flat floor with a pass-through hatch that lets you carry long loads.

    Bollinger

  • It’s not cheap, but it is cool.

    Bollinger

  • EPA range will be at least 200 miles.

    Bollinger

  • A look at the Bollinger powertrain.

    Bollinger

  • For wealthy farmers and ranchers this could be a pretty useful vehicle as well as a four-wheeled status symbol.

    Bollinger

  • Al fresco.

    Bollinger

Boutique battery electric vehicle startup Bollinger Motors is getting closer to beginning production of its forthcoming

SUV

and

pickup truck

, and on Thursday morning it filled in a blank that many were waiting for—the price. We always knew that its BEVs wouldn’t be especially cheap; they’re to be hand-built in low volume and pack 125kWh of lithium-ion between the axles. Now we know how much: $125,000 for either the B1 SUV or B2 pickup.

While that’s a lot of money, it gets you a lot of BEV. There’s that 125kWh battery pack, although Bollinger isn’t quite ready to tell us more about its supplier or the pack design. The pack powers a pair of permanent magnet AC motors—one for each axle—each sending torque to the wheels via a two-speed transaxle (with a true neutral in case you need to tow it anywhere). Total power and torque output is a hefty 614hp (458kW) and 668lb-ft (905Nm), and the curb weight is surprisingly good at just 4,800lbs (2,177kg)—significantly lighter than either an Audi e-tron or Tesla Model X SUV.

It has yet to be tested by the EPA for range, but with barn-door aerodynamics, but Bollinger says it should go at least 200 miles (321km) on a single charge. The company says that, connected to a 400V DC fast charger, a charge takes 75 minutes, although founder Robert Bollinger told me that “we are working with our battery supplier on that final capability—more on that later” when I asked whether the B1 and B2 would be able to use the new generation of more powerful DC fast chargers (currently up to 150kW for 400V BEV architectures). On a 220V (level 2) charger, a full battery will require being plugged in for 10 hours. As long as you don’t need all of your battery’s range to get home, there are 10 110V outlets (with the option of 220V), which means it should be pretty handy out in the field.

The Bollinger isn’t an SUV for long road trips, but it does have rather credible off-road abilities. In addition to the aforementioned two-speed transaxles, each axle also gets a locking differential, and the powertrain features inboard brakes and portal hub gears. There’s also a clever self-living hydraulic suspension setup with a ground clearance of 15 inches (38cm) and 10 inches (25cm) of wheel travel, and both B1 and B2 can ford water at depths of up to 36 inches (91cm).

Obviously this isn’t an electric truck for the everyman, and at $125,000 a Bollinger will cost twice as much as one of

Rivian’s SUVs or pickups

. But the company isn’t targeting Rivian-levels of production, just a few thousand a year. Bollinger told me that to date, it has received more than 34,500 online reservations, and is now accepting refundable $1,000 deposits. Production is scheduled to being in 2020, with deliveries in 2021.

Listing image by Bollinger

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

October 24, 2019 at 09:05AM

Nebula Cosmos Max: The World’s First 4K Home Cinema with 3D Audio

https://www.geeksaresexy.net/2019/10/23/nebula-cosmos-max-the-worlds-first-4k-home-cinema-with-3d-audio/

Anker has released plenty of awesome home cinema projectors in the past, but now, they’ve just unveiled their best product yet: the Nebula Cosmos Max! The Nebula Cosmos max is the world’s first 4K UHD home cinema projector with 3D audio, offering a brightness of 1500 ANSI lumens, HDR10, Dolby Digital plus, keystone correction, and more! It’s also very affordable compared to the competition considering all the feature it has! There’s also a 1080P version

Through our previous crowdfunding efforts, we’ve successfully launched the ultra-portable Capsule projector to critical acclaim. Together with the Mars projector, Nebula has successfully redefined the portable projection landscape. When we reached out to fans to find out what they wanted from our next project, the answer was unanimous: a 4K projector designed for the home. Thus the Cosmos was born.

As I’m writing this, the Cosmos kickstarter has already raised nearly $600,000 on an initial funding goal of $50,000, with 59 days remaining to the campaign. Anker has also adopted the crowdfunding approach for several of their projectors in the past, and they were all highly successful.

[Nebula Cosmos Max: World’s First 4K Home Cinema with 3D Audio]

The post Nebula Cosmos Max: The World’s First 4K Home Cinema with 3D Audio appeared first on Geeks are Sexy Technology News.

via [Geeks Are Sexy] Technology News https://ift.tt/23BIq6h

October 23, 2019 at 07:26PM