The first Android Go phones blend low prices with lots of promise

The first Android Go phones blend low prices with lots of promise

http://ift.tt/2F547s3

The world’s first Android Go phones debuted here at Mobile World Congress, and they just might change the way Android works for the developing world. We took some time to get acquainted with some of these new devices, but in case you’re not entirely up to speed on Go itself, we’ve prepared this handy primer.

What is Android Oreo Go Edition?

Easy. In short, it’s a customized build of Android Oreo meant to run better on inexpensive phones. (It’s also more generically referred to as Android Go, and I’m going to stick with that name.) Google announced it at its I/O developer conference for devices with 1GB or less of RAM, but it’s appealing for more than just the way it manages performance.

Android Go doesn’t take as much as space as typical Android, for one, so you don’t have to worry as much about running out of memory. Data usage is more of a concern in some markets than others, so Google has also released a handful of Go-optimized apps (think YouTube, Google Maps, Gmail and more) that attempt to minimize data costs. Hell, even the version of the Play Store on Go phones has been tweaked — it highlights apps Google knows will run well on these more limited devices.

YNET

Why does this matter?

Let’s say you wanted to buy a brand new Android phone for $100 — there’s a strong chance you’d wind up with a phone running a slightly dated version of Android. Those phones (obviously) lack some of the features found in up-to-date models. Even though everyone (more or less) has access to the same apps, the experience of using Android can differ pretty wildly depending on the hardware you’re working with.

Android Go, then, is an attempt to level the playing field a little and ensure that the Android experience is more consistent across all kinds of devices. Android Go won’t make a $100 phone feel as fast as a flagship, but it’ll bring important Oreo features to a wider audience and help make sure inexpensive phones aren’t awful to use. That’s the idea, anyway.

What’s using an Android Go phone like?

Now we’re getting to the fun stuff. Brands like ZTE, General Mobile, Micromax and Lava have brought the first Go phones here to MWC, but I spent most of my time playing with two phones in particular. We saw Alcatel’s 1X early on in the show, and it’s fascinating because it squeezes a 5.3-inch 18:9 screen into such an inexpensive body. That display ran at what Alcatel calls "VGA+" so it’s not the crispest thing you’ll ever see, but for €99 (or about $120) that’s no great sin.

Driving the phone was a quad-core MediaTek chipset with 1GB of RAM, and it ran generally well… at least until I started firing up too many apps and jumped between them a lot. Alcatel later told me this was because the phone’s software was far from final, but it was a reminder that Android Go’s existence doesn’t obviate the need for good software engineering.

The 1X is also a great example of the kind of control Google doesn’t exercise over its Android Go partners. Alcatel’s Go phone uses a non-stock launcher and has a handful of preloaded apps, so nothing but good sense is preventing device makers from painting over (and potentially slowing down) stock Oreo Go.

I was more fond of the Nokia 1, a small, charming device with a surprisingly nice 4.7-inch screen. When I first walked into Nokia’s booth to take a look at the thing, I thought the company had put dummy phones up on display because the 1’s screen looked so crisp and nicely saturated. The joke’s on me, I guess. The Nokia 1 uses a quad-core MediaTek chipset and 1GB of RAM as well, but overall it felt much more stable and smooth-running than the Alcatel 1X. Launching apps sometimes took an extra moment, but it was never frustrating and I couldn’t trip it up by jumping between multiple apps the way I could with the Alcatel. The new version’s 5-megapixel camera is obviously not great and its polycarbonate design can feel lacking, but all told it’s a strong (and cute) package for just $85.

Chris Velazco/Engadget

And there are Google’s Go Edition apps. They’re low-impact versions of existing apps and in the case of Gmail and YouTube, they seem to work just as well as their standard counterparts. YouTube Go worked fine as well, though I didn’t get a chance to try its best feature: the ability to download videos and share them with other devices. I put one relatively new Go-optimized app through its paces, though: Google Assistant. Originally exclusive to Google’s Pixel phones, the company announced it would expand Assistant support to other Android phones at MWC last year. The catch? Among other things, Android phones needed at least 1.5GB of RAM to use the feature.

Not anymore, though. Since most of Assistant’s work happens in the cloud, it functioned just as well on this $85 phone as it does on my Pixel 2 XL. The only real difference is that you can’t invoke it with an "OK, Google" — it requires a tap on the app icon. Even so, it’s pretty great.

So, what happens next?

That’s a tough one — none of these devices have gone on sale yet, and the actions of the companies that make them depend on people’s response to them. Google, however, told the Indian Express it would make Android Go versions of all future Android builds since it’s core to the company’s commitment to entry-level devices. You might have only just heard of Android Go, but it’s not going anywhere.

You can also expect some super-cheap Go phones to appear, too — Google suggested we’d see some sell for as low as $50, but the least expensive we’ve seen so far is the $80 ZTE Tempo Go. (Turkey’s General Mobile India-based Lava and Micromax haven’t said how much their Go phones will cost.) We’re cautiously optimistic. This is early days for Android Go, and it may well change how people around the world get to experience Android. The lack of control over what OEMs can do to Go Phones may mean some problems low-end phones face are never resolved. We’ll just have to wait and see.

Catch up on the latest news from MWC 2018 right here.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

March 1, 2018 at 02:51PM

NBC will cut back on ads during primetime to lure more viewers

NBC will cut back on ads during primetime to lure more viewers

http://ift.tt/2oA9Z25

If you’ve been irritated by the increase of commercials into primetime programming, you’re not alone. Now, NBCUniversal is doing something about it across its networks. The company is cutting back on primetime advertising during original programming. The number of ads in a commercial break will be reduced by 20 percent, while the amount of ad time in a given show will decrease by 10 percent, according to Variety.

This follows from an experiment NBC did with Saturday Night Live starting in 2016, when it cut the show’s ad load by 30 percent; while the company didn’t make clear exactly why it was cutting advertisements during the show, we speculated that it was to attract millennial viewers who have become accustomed to the Netflix model. It’s easy to fire up YouTube the day after SNL to watch the best sketches, after all.

What NBC found was that Saturday Night Live‘s ratings went up, and as a result the company was able to charge more for fewer ads. Now the company is applying that strategy across its original primetime lineup. It’s not clear what form the change will take; NBC will also introduce new types of ads (including longer commercials) that it claims will provide more value than the traditional 30-second format. This may also lead to more product placement within shows as a result of fewer ad opportunities to sell.

Source: Variety

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

March 1, 2018 at 03:33PM

Facebook will stream The Oscars red carpet this weekend

Facebook will stream The Oscars red carpet this weekend

http://ift.tt/2CRMupN

The Academy Awards take place this Sunday and if you’re an Oscar fan who can’t get enough behind-the-scenes looks, Facebook has you covered. As Variety reports, Facebook will once again be the only social network to live-stream "The Oscars: All Access," which includes red carpet and backstage views as well as interviews with presenters, nominees and performers. The show will begin at 6:30 PM Eastern/3:30 PM Pacific and will stream on the Facebook pages of both ABC and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. You can also catch it on Oscar.com and ABCNews.com.

Sofia Carson (Pretty Little Liars: The Perfectionists, Descendants), Wesam Keesh (For the People, Awkward.) and commentators Chris Connelly, Ben Lyons and Adnan Virk will host "The Oscars: All Access." You can also check out more coverage over on Instagram where Tom Holland (Avengers: Infinity War, Spider-Man: Homecoming) will be taking over Stories on Instagram’s official account and the Academy will share content via Stories and Instagram Live.

Facebook has done this before. It played host to "The Oscars: All Access" last year as well and streamed content during the Emmy Awards in September. Following last year’s Academy Awards, Facebook said Oscar-related videos on its site garnered over 112 million views.

The Academy Awards air this Sunday at 8 PM Eastern/5 PM Pacific on ABC.

Via: Variety

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

March 1, 2018 at 07:09PM

Amazon faces criticism for being ‘complicit’ with counterfeiters

Amazon faces criticism for being ‘complicit’ with counterfeiters

http://ift.tt/2HZGsqz

Amazon pledged to tackle counterfeiting in 2017, but its lax policies are still hurting inventors and small companies, one supplier says. In a blog post, Elevation Lab founder Casey Hopkins wrote that a Chinese manufacturer ripped off its popular under-desk headphone stand, "The Anchor" and is selling it cheap on Amazon and taking all its sales. Worse, he claims that Amazon is effectively abetting such counterfeiters and could do away with it via a simple change.

According to Hopkins, the counterfeit seller "literally reverse engineered it, made steel compression molds, made the logo wrong, used fake 3M adhesive that’s very thin and was die-cut smaller than the top, they used a lower durometer silicone so it flexes more, it has huge mold parting lines, and the packaging is literally photocopied then reprinted (you can tell by the lack of image contrast)."

The result, he says, is that "customers are unknowingly buying crap versions of the product, while both Amazon and the scammers are profiting, and the reputation you’ve built goes down the toilet." It’s particularly onerous for small businesses, because new sellers pop up constantly and it can take Amazon precious days to remove them.

Customers are unknowingly buying crap versions of the product, while both Amazon and the scammers are profiting, and the reputation you’ve built goes down the toilet.

And yet the fix is simple, Hopkins says. To stop counterfeiting, Amazon established a registry of approved sellers in 2016, aka the "Brand Registry." All it has to do to help small inventors is add a check box for suppliers that only sell directly to Amazon and don’t use wholesalers. "Anyone else would have have to get approval or high vetting to sell the product," Hopkins said. On top of that, Amazon needs to increase its Brand Registry team so it can swat away counterfeit scammers more quickly, he believes.

Amazon has been regularly criticized for being too lax on counterfeiters, a problem that has kept the fashion world well away from the site, for instance. Chanel recently won a judgement against counterfeiters, but only after it persisted following a court setback. Smaller companies, though, are ill-equipped to take on expensive lawsuits.

The feds might soon wade into the fray, however. The US Government Accountability Office recently completed an investigation and was able to purchase 47 counterfeit products from Amazon, Walmart and other companies. Senator Orrin Hatch plans to convene a Senate hearing on the issue.

Source: Elevation Lab

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

March 2, 2018 at 08:21AM

This Exosuit Learns How You Walk To Give You A Boost

This Exosuit Learns How You Walk To Give You A Boost

http://ift.tt/2GTyLRv

Exosuits may seem the stuff of anime and superhero movies, but the technology is actually used for assisting those who might need a boost to go about their daily lives.
These wearable technologies fit onto the body, usually the legs, much like a high-tech wetsuit. The exosuit is designed to provide supportive force to various points of the leg when needed, helping the user walk more easily and naturally.
Now, new research out of Harvard University published in Science Robotics shows th

Tech

via Discover Main Feed http://ift.tt/1dqgCKa

March 1, 2018 at 01:47PM

Accelerating clinical research through mobile technology

Accelerating clinical research through mobile technology

http://ift.tt/2t8GKYV

Researchers face a number of challenges when conducting a clinical study.1 Investigators spend considerable time and money recruiting and screening viable participants. If recruitment takes too long, important studies can get scrapped before they are even started. Once a study is underway, participants must sacrifice their own time to make clinic visits, which, for long-term studies, can reduce participant retention. Incorporating internet and mobile technologies into a study’s design can re

Tech

via Discover Main Feed http://ift.tt/1dqgCKa

March 1, 2018 at 06:04PM

NPR Poll: After Parkland, Number of Americans Who Want Gun Restrictions Grows

NPR Poll: After Parkland, Number of Americans Who Want Gun Restrictions Grows

http://ift.tt/2oKBipB

Vince Warner fires an AK-47 with a bump stock installed at Good Guys Gun and Range in Utah. A significant majority of Americans favor outlawing the attachment, according to the latest NPR/Ipsos poll.

George Frey/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

George Frey/Getty Images

Vince Warner fires an AK-47 with a bump stock installed at Good Guys Gun and Range in Utah. A significant majority of Americans favor outlawing the attachment, according to the latest NPR/Ipsos poll.

George Frey/Getty Images

An increasing number of Americans, both Republicans and Democrats, want more gun regulation, according to a new NPR/Ipsos poll that surveyed people in the aftermath of the Parkland school shooting.

Three-quarters of people polled said gun laws should be stricter than they are today. That’s an increase — in a short period of time — from October 2017, when NPR conducted a similar survey in the wake of the Las Vegas shooting. Then, 68 percent said gun laws should be stricter than they were.

The poll also found widespread bipartisan support for a range of gun-control policies, including:

  • requiring background checks for all gun buyers (94 percent),
  • adding people with mental illnesses to the federal gun background check system (92 percent),
  • raising the legal age to purchase guns from 18 to 21 (82 percent),
  • banning bump stocks (81 percent),
  • banning high-capacity ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds (73 percent) and
  • banning assault-style weapons (72 percent).

The only policy intended to curb gun violence that is opposed by a majority of Americans (59 percent) is the one most frequently touted by President Trump — the idea of training teachers to carry guns in schools.

The poll also found that while nearly every gun policy was supported by a majority of both Republicans and Democrats, the one exception was arming teachers.

There was a clear-cut partisan gulf — 68 percent of Republicans favored the idea of training teachers to carry guns compared to just 18 percent of Democrats. Arming teachers was by far the most polarizing policy suggestion; the poll found a 50-point divide between Republicans and Democrats.

Trump’s in sync with his base

The president’s outspoken criticism of schools as gun-free zones and his recent rhetoric calling for a comprehensive gun bill suggests he’s acutely aware of how his base voters feel about gun policies — and the growing desire, even among Republicans, for some sort of stricter gun-control legislation.

“We see in this study, a majority of Republicans saying that they are supportive of a variety of different gun-control measures, many of which Trump mentioned explicitly in his [White House] briefing,” said Chris Jackson, director of the public polling team at Ipsos. “And that’s in contrast to a lot of Republican elected officials, who have taken a much more Second Amendment absolutist stance.”

Although Trump remains friendly with the National Rifle Association and its leadership, he’s recently shown a willingness to challenge GOP orthodoxy on guns.

In a televised White House meeting with legislators Wednesday, Trump surprised (and angered) many of his fellow conservative lawmakers with his ad-hoc approach to gun-control policy. He questioned his fellow Republicans’ relationship with the NRA and dismissed a concealed carry provision that conservatives wanted as a trade-off for some restrictions.

“They have great power over you people. They have less power over me,” Trump told GOP lawmakers at that meeting, adding, “Some of you people are petrified of the NRA. You can’t be petrified.”

Trump suggested he was open to expanding background checks and possibly raising the age to purchase an AR-15. (Both popular measures, according to the NPR/Ipsos poll).

“President Trump is actually closer to where the Republican base is on the issue of guns than a lot of Republican elected officials,” Jackson said. “And I think this is something that Trump has done a lot through his political career; he often times finds himself closer to the Republican base than the establishment does.”

Of course, the president has a history of adopting popular opinions and speaking to the polls, and then subsequently reversing his position and reverting to a more traditionally conservative attitude, as he did with his initial support for a bill that would protect DACA recipients from deportation.

Americans want Congress to act

Any hope for a quick legislative answer to the gun debate fell apart in the Senate Thursday. And although the Senate now has no plans to vote on gun legislation in the near future, the NPR/Ipsos poll finds that a majority of Americans (78 percent) say Congress needs to do more to address gun violence.

But the intensity for congressional action lies with the Democrats — 93 percent of whom want more action, compared to 68 percent among Republicans.

Jackson said the biggest change he’s noticed since the October survey is the overall importance people are giving to the gun debate. Crime/gun violence is now the No. 1 issue worrying Americans. (Last October, it was terrorism).

The shift since last fall is largely because more Democrats and independents say they’re concerned about guns, but Republicans shifted some as well.

And the poll found Americans are currently saying guns will be an important factor in their vote this November. Roughly two-thirds, or 63 percent, said so.

Traditionally, gun control is one of those issues that’s dominated by a small slice of the electorate — an energized group of committed gun-rights activists.

But the political winds may be shifting.

“This data indicates there’s actually an increasing energy on the side of gun control,” Jackson said. And “given that guns have become very partisan, that may have really significant results in the midterms.”

And there are signs the NRA’s influence among voters may be declining. The NPR survey shows a decreasing number of Americans overall (led by a shift in Democrats’ attitudes) said the NRA represents their views — just 36 percent overall down from 43 percent in October.

Guns are still partisan

There are still some major disagreements along party lines that reflect the overall gun debate in the country.

On the question of whether the country would be safer if more people carried guns, there was a huge divide, for example — 55 percent of Republicans felt the country would be safer, compared to just 15 percent of Democrats.

And likewise, when people were asked whether they believed the premise that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun — there was a split along partisan lines — 71 percent of Republicans agreed, compared to 24 percent of Democrats.

The split over Trump’s handling of the Parkland shooting situation seems to mirror his overall approval rating and shows how much partisanship affects people’s perspectives — 71 percent of Republicans approved of how the president handled the aftermath of the school shooting, compared to just 9 percent of Democrats.


The poll was conducted from Feb. 27-28 with a survey sample of 1,005 adults across the country, chosen randomly from Ipsos’s online panel. They were interviewed in English, and the sample includes 351 Democrats, 341 Republicans and 203 independents. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

News

via NPR Topics: News http://ift.tt/2m0CM10

March 2, 2018 at 04:08AM