Drug companies submerged WV in opioids: One town of 3,000 got 21 million pills

Enlarge /

WASHINGTON, DC – OCTOBER 25: Committee chairman Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) questions witnesses during a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing concerning federal efforts to combat the opioid crisis.

Drug companies hosed tiny towns in West Virginia with a deluge of addictive and deadly opioid pills over the last decade, according to an ongoing investigation by the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2Gxj432
via IFTTT

Chinese satellite uses quantum cryptography for secure video conference between continents

Quantum cryptography allows communication that is guaranteed to be secure, thanks to the laws of physics. And it is becoming increasingly important.

Physicists have long known that quantum computers will be able to break almost all other types of cryptography. Since these devices are becoming more capable, the writing is on the wall for conventional encryption. So commercial businesses, governments, and the military are all waiting with bated breath for practical quantum cryptography systems to be developed.

But there is a problem. The quantum cryptography relies on individual photons to carry quantum information. But even the best optical fibers can carry these photons only so far—around 200 kilometers—before light absorption makes the process impossible. So quantum cryptography has never worked over much longer distances.

Today that changes, thanks to an extraordinary Chinese satellite launched in in 2016. The Micius satellite has racked up a number of milestones in the year or so since it started operating. Last summer, it teleported the first object from Earth to orbit—a single photon.

Now the satellite has set up the first intercontinental quantum cryptography service. Researchers have tested the system by setting up a secure videoconference between Europe and China. For the first time, the security of this videoconference was guaranteed by the laws of physics.

The method is straightforward. Quantum cryptography relies on what’s called a one-time pad to guarantee privacy. This is a set of random numbers—a key—that can be used by two parties to encode and decode a message.

Traditionally, the problem with one-time pads is in ensuring that only the transmitter and the receiver have them. How can both parties be sure that no eavesdropper has copied the key while it is distributed?

This problem is neatly solved by sending the key using quantum particles such as photons, since it is always possible to tell whether a quantum particle has been previously observed. If it has, the key is abandoned and another sent until both parties are sure they are in possession of an unobserved one-time pad.

That’s quantum key distribution—the crucial process at the heart of quantum cryptography. After both parties have the key—the one-time pad—they can communicate over ordinary classic channels with perfect security.

The Micius satellite simply distributes this key from orbit. Because it is in a sun-synchronous orbit over the poles, the satellite passes over every part of the Earth’s surface at roughly the same local time each day.

So when the satellite is over the Chinese ground station at Xinglong in China’s northern Hebei province, it sends the one-time pad to the ground, encoded in single photons using a well-established protocol. As the Earth rotates beneath the satellite and as the ground station at Graz in Austria comes into view, Micius sends the same one-time pad to the receiver there.

The two locations then both possess the same key that allows them to initiate completely secure communication over a classic link.

However, the experiment goes one step further. The goal was to set up a videoconference between the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing and the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, so the key has to be distributed securely to both these locations. And for that the teams use ground-based quantum communication over optical fibers.

Finally, they set up a video link secured by the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) that is refreshed every second by 128-bit seed codes. In September, they held a pioneering videoconference that lasted for 75 minutes with a total data transmission of roughly two gigabytes.

“We have demonstrated intercontinental quantum communication among multiple locations on Earth with a maximal separation of 7,600 kilometers,” say the teams, which are led by Anton Zeilinger at the University of Vienna and by Jian-Wei Pan at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei, China.

There are some potential weaknesses in the system to work on for the future. Perhaps the most significant is that the satellite is considered secure during the time it takes to connect the two ground stations. That may well be true—who could hack an orbiting satellite?—but this security is not guaranteed by the laws of physics. However, the teams say that this can be addressed in future designs with an end-to-end quantum relay.

Whatever the shortcomings, this is impressive work. It is a proof-of-principle demonstration of secure communication on a global scale. “Our work points towards an efficient solution for an ultralong-distance global quantum network, laying the groundwork for a future quantum Internet,” say Zeilinger, Jian-Wei, and their colleagues.

Plenty of governments, military operators, and commercial businesses are eager for a similar capability. So it surely won’t be long before commercial versions of the Micius satellite are selling this kind of secure communication around the world. With China leading the way.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1801.04418 : Satellite-Relayed Intercontinental Quantum Network

from Technology Review Feed – Tech Review Top Stories http://ift.tt/2EnNwfi
via IFTTT

What to Know About Monero, the Black Market Cryptocurrency That’s Going Mainstream

Over the weekend, we learned that hackers were using YouTube ads to take over computers and force them to mine cryptocurrency. These types of attacks (known as cryptojacking) are only becoming more common, but a closer look at the practice reveals that it’s usually tied to one particular currency: Monero.

Released in 2014, Monero was designed to keep its users anonymous. That’s made it a popular cryptocurrency for the dark web black market, where dealers accept it in exchange for guns, drugs and stolen credit cards, according to a Wired report in early 2017.

But in the past year Monero surged into the mainstream. It’s currently the 13th most valuable cryptocurrency in the world, and priced at $275 according to CoinMarketCap. It also popped up on a number of recent lists predicting Monero could be one of Bitcoin’s biggest rivals heading into 2018.

Here’s what you need to know about Monero, where it comes from, where it’s headed, and how to buy some.

What is Monero?

Like Bitcoin, Monero’s origins are a bit of a mystery. The cryptocurrency was first outlined in 2013 by Nicolas van Saberhagen, which is likely a pseudonym for the anonymous creator (or group of creators). It was coded into existence by another anonymous creator with the user name “thankful_for_today” and given the name “Bitmonero” (“monero” means coin in Esperanto). In 2014, the currency was forked, creating the Monero coin that’s popular today.

Monera was created to solve one particular issue with Bitcoin: anonymity. It’s possible to stay anonymous with Bitcoin, but because of the way the blockchain works all transactions can be tracked to the accounts involved. It’s also possible to see how much Bitcoin is stored in someone’s account.

As long as you keep your identity secret that’s not an issue, but once you attach your name to any Bitcoin-related deal it’s easy for other people to track you down. That’s a big problem if you’re using Bitcoin to do something illegal (like buy drugs on the dark web), and that’s where Monero comes in.

Monero uses a few methods to keep people anonymous. The first is “stealth addresses,” meaning your blockchain address is encrypted so it can’t be linked back to you. Monero also groups each transaction with hundreds of others, making it harder to trace one particular sale, and hides the amount of currency being spent in each deal.

What’s Next for Monero?

Beyond drug deals, Monero could help solve a lot of other issues facing Bitcoin as it becomes mainstream. In the future you may be able to pay your rent in cryptocurrency, but with Bitcoin the landlord could trace your account and see how much money you have. Monero keeps you anonymous so that people you pay won’t also be privy to your larger financial picture.

Monero may also be on the verge of partnering with another rising cryptocurrency with a little more name recognition. Litecoin founder Charlie Lee recently tweeted that he’s interested in working with Monero so the two currencies could be easily exchanged.

In the meantime, Monero has plenty of competition. Dash (currently valued at $685 per coin) uses a similar strategy of bundling transactions together to keep everyone anonymous. Zcash ($385 at the time of writing) takes anonymity a step further, claiming its encryption makes it mathematically impossible to trace.

How to Buy Monero

You can’t buy Monero on Coinbase (the most popular digital currency exchange in the U.S.), but there are plenty of other options.

A handful of exchanges will let you buy Monero with government-backed money, including popular service like Kraken and Bitfinex. You can also use a website like LocalMonero or MoneroForCash to find someone interested in selling to you directly.

from Lifehacker http://ift.tt/2E0d7x3
via IFTTT

iOS 11 Is So Broken That Apple Is Reportedly Delaying Features in iOS 12

It looks like iOS 12 won’t be as flashy or fun as Apple originally wanted it to be. Following months of embarrassing bugs and performance issues, the company is reportedly pushing some features originally slated for this year’s iOS 12 update back to 2019. Engineers will be focusing on quality and reliability instead.

In tandem reports, Bloomberg and Axios say that Apple executives made the tough decision to delay the new iPhone features earlier this month. Among the things that will get moved to next year are a redesigned home screen and a new algorithmically enhanced photo management app. Updates to the native mail app as well as the “in-car user interfaces” could also be on the chopping block.

This doesn’t necessarily mean that iOS 12 will be some boring under-the-hood update. iPhone users can apparently look forward to more augmented reality features that they’ll never use, not to mention additional parental controls that will creep out their kids, as well as enhanced health data tracking that will creep out everyone. But in all seriousness, the new features won’t be nearly as welcome as an operating system that actually works. As many know from experience, iOS 11 really did struggle.

And of course, everyone also knows that Apple is coming out of an unusual year where the company really screwed up a lot of stuff. Not only was the new iOS release riddled with bugs, but Apple also struggled to make enough iPhone X units to sell for the big release. Then there were some tremendously bad security vulnerabilities that let people gain access to Macs without a password and other bugs that broke mobile devices. All of that happened in the last couple months of 2017 alone. Now, as the company prepares to announce its fourth quarter earnings, some analysts expect Apple to report lower than anticipated iPhone X sales (and some expect record revenue).

So yah, Apple, buddy. Maybe take some time and regroup. Don’t worry about making anything too crazy or futuristic. Seems like engineers need to focus on what’s right in front them before thinking too far ahead.

[Bloomberg, Axios]

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2BEYWZ6
via IFTTT

This ‘Airbnb For DIY Garage Space’ Lets You Wrench In Random People’s Garages

Image: David Tracy. Art: Jason Torchinsky

Thirty one-year-old Andrew Koretz just emailed me about his new company, “Garage Time,” which apparently allows anyone to rent out unused garage space to people who just need a place to wrench. It actually sounds like a great idea.

Andrew told me over the phone that he’s a car enthusiast who, for the longest time, found himself wrenching on his 2002 Porsche 996 in his friends’ garages in Chicago. He had just traded his Toyota 4Runner SR5 for the sports car and was keen to keep it well maintained. But his apartment in the city—and the cold weather—made taking care of even the basics like serpentine belts and fluids a real chore. While friends let him use their space, Andrew always threw them a few bucks to “reduce the friction.”

It was this experience, Andrew says, that led him to start “Garage Time” after growing tired of his old job working in financial services. Having opened just two weeks ago, the “online marketplace” aims to allow people to rent out their garages (or even just a slab of concrete) at whatever rate they want to folks who just need a place to work on cars, motorcycles or other projects for a few hours or a few days; there’s no time limit. The company makes money by taking 10 percent of what the wrencher pays to the garage owner.

There really aren’t very many listings on the site yet; Andrew told me that only a “couple of dozen” transactions have taken place thus far. But Andrew—who’s from Oakland, California originally but now lives in Denver—plans to solve that by getting the word out.

Marketing, along with proving out the concept and refining the user experience—especially in Denver—is Andrew’s top priority for now. From there, he hopes to focus on expanding in other major cities like San Francisco, Chicago and New York.

Obviously liability seems like it might be a big issue, here, since we’re dealing with heavy machinery. Andrew—the sole founder and financier of the company—admits this, and says there isn’t a solution in place yet, though he’s apparently working with insurance carriers to establish a policy that mimics that of Airbnb. In other words, he wants his company to be able to pay any accidental damages that occur during someone’s wrenching.

While there really isn’t a lot to choose from on the website now, the screengrab above shows the general concept. A guy named Jacob H is offering his ordinary, run-of-the-mill two-car garage to wrenchers at a rate of $20 per hour (Andrew guesses that $20 to $35 an hour will be the average price).

There’s a map on the right side, and under the pictures of the garage, Jacob has written a short description of the space, as well as stipulations on the type of work that can be done there. Below that is a list of tools available for use in the garage, including work lights and a “standard tool set.”

Today, you can find a number of self-serve garages like this one in Michigan that tend to be cheap ($12 per hour!) ways to snag a warm, dry spot to rent some tools and wrench on a car. But such shops aren’t exactly on every street corner (obviously, neither is Garage Time yet), and they don’t really allow regular folks to rent out and make some money on their underutilized space. Andrew claims his company is the first “garage peer to peer marketplace.”

It’s an interesting idea that appears to be quite early in its stages of development, as there’s no insurance policy, no way to prevent someone from building a random burner account to sidestep a poor review, no phone app, and Andrew admits there’s no way to stop anyone else from building essentially the same business.

But he says on his website that his goal is to “[help] motor enthusiasts find DIY vehicle workspace and helps garage owners get paid to share their space,” and—on the face of it—that sounds like a great idea.

The marketplace is currently live here, and anyone in the U.S. can now list their garage (or concrete slab) for rent at any rate they desire. It’s probably worth mentioning that I only just learned about this company via a random email, and though I did speak with Andrew for a half an hour on the topic, I’d say it’s probably wise to proceed with whatever caution you normally assume when dealing with a new business with no real reviews yet.

Still, the idea sounds awesome. What I wouldn’t have given for such a thing back when I lived in a tiny studio apartment in downtown Detroit. It would have spared me quite a few weird looks from the security guards patrolling the FCA parking lots. And also some frostbite.

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2DZGsry
via IFTTT

Google Took Down 700,000+ Bad Apps in 2017, Booted 100,000 Bad Developers From Google Play

google play bad apps 2017

The battle over clean, non-malicious apps on Google Play is a never-ending battle that Google is constantly finding new ways to address. For 2017, they not only improved on their ability to detect bad apps, they discovered new techniques that help them identify repeat offenders. In doing so, they announced today that they took down 700,000+ apps on Google Play that violated the store’s policies, but also kicked out 100,000 bad developers.

That seems like a lot of bad apps and bad developers. They didn’t say 700 apps and 100 developers – they said 700K AND 100K. Yikes. Bad people sure do love them some Android it seems.

Google did say that the 700,000-app-takedown was 70% more than they took down in 2016. Additionally, they caught bad apps sooner than ever, stating that “99% of apps with abusive contents were identified and rejected before anyone could install them.” And finally, of the 100,000 developers who got the boot, Google said that they made it more difficult for them to create new accounts and go back through the process of trying to post evil apps.

If you’d like to know more about the types of apps that Google takes down to protect you, hit up that link below.

// Google

Google Took Down 700,000+ Bad Apps in 2017, Booted 100,000 Bad Developers From Google Play is a post from: Droid Life

from Droid Life: A Droid Community Blog http://ift.tt/2E05HtH
via IFTTT

Apple under investigation by DOJ, SEC for disclosures of its iPhone slow-down update

Apple’s battery fiasco continues to grow as the US government gets involved. According to a Bloomberg report, the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission are investigating if Apple violated securities laws with its disclosures surrounding a software update that intentionally slowed down the performance of older iPhones. The DOJ and SEC have requested more information from Apple on the subject.

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2DQAQ3T
via IFTTT