Water-powered car!!

June 13th, 2008

Japan has developed a water-powered test car!! :eek:

It can sustain 80 km/h for an hour on 1 liter of freakin’ water!!! How come we don’t have that already?! I will tell you why… it’s because of those money and life sucking oil companies!! That’s why!! :-x All those oil companies better get on the right gear ’cause I’m not paying freakin’ $5/gallon!!

Entry Filed under: Driving, Science & Engineering, Techie

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. c.h.ha  |  June 13th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    Also, the Japanese are super-smart and efficient. Americans? Blaaaahhhh…

  • 2. peterjang73  |  June 13th, 2008 at 3:10 pm

    Yes… but they also tend to be a bit…. too anal about things. Efficiency isn’t everything…

  • 3. DP  |  June 17th, 2008 at 4:38 pm

    Almost all ways of creating energy that I know of consists of breaking more unstable chemical bond that results in a more stable chemical bond and released energy….

    I dont know…I would not be surprised if this is some hoax to get some funding - the report was very sparse in the science behind it:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-fuelled_car

    anyway, oil companies are not your enemies.

    note: around when did gas prices start spiking from about mid to low 2 dollars a gallon to 4 dollars plus?

  • 4. Carlton  |  June 18th, 2008 at 9:10 am

    Viktor Schauberger did a lot with “water devices” in the 1940’s that would run without ceasing, after an initial start. It looks like most of his designs were based on generating a vortex that would develop a vacuum somewhere in the device. And the vacuum would keep it running. Also he pulled power from the vortex to turn a small gear that would be used to run a generator (for electricity).

  • 5. DP  |  June 19th, 2008 at 10:02 am

    I do not know who that Viktor guy is, but just by what you stated, if that vortex was truly a closed system (ie, no other external sources of energy kept the vortex going), then it sounds like a perpetual motion machine and thus violates the law of conservation of energy - ie, it generates more energy than it consumes.

    In other words, I am skeptical of it.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed