In ‘Truth Behind the Moon Landing,’ Former Astronaut Leland Melvin Helps Debunk Conspiracy Theories

https://www.space.com/truth-behind-moon-landing-science-channel.html

Former NASA astronaut Leland Melvin joins a group tackling conspiracy theories about the moon landing — and the space program in general — in a new Science Channel series.

Called “Truth Behind the Moon Landing,” the six-episode series premiered June 2 at 10 p.m. EDT/PDT on the Science Channel and will air on Sundays through June and July. It will focus on several space-related conspiracy claims, among them whether we actually landed on the moon 50 years ago on July 20, 1969. (Spoiler alert: We did.)

Space.com editor in chief Tariq Malik is one of the series guests. He will make an appearance in an episode about the Manned Orbiting Laboratory, a 1960s-era U.S. Air Force military space station that never launched into space.

Related: 25 Space Conspiracies That Just Won’t Die

Melvin, who flew twice on the space shuttle, will co-host the show with two others: Iraq War veteran and former FBI agent Chad Jenkins, and the best-selling author Mike Bara. Together, they will uncover evidence and apply the scientific method to several conspiracies. The trio will discuss topics such as the fatal Apollo 1 fire in 1967; a lunar-lander prototype that Neil Armstrong, the first person who walked on the moon used for training; and the capabilities of Hollywood visual effects in the late 1960s.

“Almost immediately after the successful and triumphant Apollo 11 moon landing nearly 50 years ago, there were skeptics who refused to accept that humankind could accomplish such an enormous undertaking,” Science Channel representatives said in a statement. “Astonishingly, some of those same doubts persist today, despite the enormous scientific progress that has been made since then.”

Catch the next episode of “Truth Behind the Moon Landing,” about the Apollo 1 fire, on Sunday, June 9 at 10 p.m. EDT/PDT on Science Channel.

For more information on Apollo hoaxes, check out this past Space.com story that investigates (and debunks) the 10 most popular moon conspiracies

Follow Elizabeth Howell on Twitter @howellspace. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook

Have a news tip, correction or comment? Let us know at community@space.com.

via Space.com http://bit.ly/2WPkkGi

June 8, 2019 at 07:54AM

Physicists Search for Monstrous Higgs Particle. It Could Seal the Fate of the Universe.

https://www.space.com/giant-higgs-fate-of-universe.html

We all know and love the Higgs boson — which to physicists’ chagrin has been mistakenly tagged in the media as the “God particle” — a subatomic particle first spotted in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) back in 2012. That particle is a piece of a field that permeates all of space-time; it interacts with many particles, like electrons and quarks, providing those particles with mass, which is pretty cool.

But the Higgs that we spotted was surprisingly lightweight. According to our best estimates, it should have been a lot heavier. This opens up an interesting question: Sure, we spotted a Higgs boson, but was that the only Higgs boson? Are there more floating around out there doing their own things?

Though we don’t have any evidence yet of a heavier Higgs, a team of researchers based at the LHC, the world’s largest atom smasher, is digging into that question as we speak. And there’s talk that as protons are smashed together inside the ring-shaped collider, hefty Higgs and even Higgs particles made up of various types of Higgs could come out of hiding. [Beyond Higgs: 5 Elusive Particles That May Lurk in the Universe]

If the heavy Higgs does indeed exist, then we need to reconfigure our understanding of the Standard Model of particle physics with the newfound realization that there’s much more to the Higgs than meets the eye. And within those complex interactions, there might be a clue to everything from the mass of the ghostly neutrino particle to the ultimate fate of the universe.

All about the boson

Without the Higgs boson, pretty much the whole Standard Model comes crashing down. But to talk about the Higgs boson, we first need to understand how the Standard Model views the universe.

In our best conception of the subatomic world using the Standard Model, what we think of as particles aren’t actually very important. Instead, there are fields. These fields permeate and soak up all of space and time. There is one field for each kind of particle. So, there’s a field for electrons, a field for photons, and so on and so on. What you think of as particles are really local little vibrations in their particular fields. And when particles interact (by, say, bouncing off of each other), it’s really the vibrations in the fields that are doing a very complicated dance. [The 12 Strangest Objects in the Universe]

The Higgs boson has a special kind of field. Like the other fields, it permeates all of space and time, and it also gets to talk and play with everybody else’s fields.

But the Higgs’ field has two very important jobs to do that can’t be achieved by any other field.

Its first job is to talk to the W and Z bosons (via their respective fields), the carriers of the weak nuclear force. By talking to these other bosons, the Higgs is able to give them mass and make sure that they stay separated from the photons, the carriers of electromagnetic force. Without the Higgs boson running interference, all these carriers would be merged together and those two forces would merge together.

The other job of the Higgs boson is to talk to other particles, like electrons; through these conversations, it also gives them mass. This all works out nicely, because we have no other way of explaining the masses of these particles.

Light and heavy

This was all worked out in the 1960s through a series of complicated but assuredly elegant math, but there’s just one tiny hitch to the theory: There’s no real way to predict the exact mass of the Higgs boson. In other words, when you go looking for the particle (which is the little local vibration of the much larger field) in a particle collider, you don’t know exactly what and where you’re going to find it. [The 11 Most Beautiful Mathematical Equations]

In 2012, scientists at the LHC announced the discovery of the Higgs boson after finding a few of the particles that represent the Higgs’ field had been produced when protons were smashed into one another at near light-speed. These particles had a mass of 125 gigaelectronvolts (GeV), or about the equivalent of 125 protons — so it’s kind of heavy but not incredibly huge.

At first glance, all that sounds fine. Physicists didn’t really have a firm prediction for the mass of the Higgs boson, so it could be whatever it wanted to be; we happened to find the mass within the energy range of the LHC. Break out the bubbly, and let’s start celebrating.

Except that there are some hesitant, kind-of-sort-of half-predictions about the mass of the Higgs boson based on the way it interacts with yet another particle, the top quark. Those calculations predict a number way higher than 125 GeV. It could just be that those predictions are wrong, but then we have to circle back to the math and figure out where things are going haywire. Or the mismatch between broad predictions and the reality of what was found inside the LHC could mean that there’s more to the Higgs boson story.

Huge Higgs

There very well could be a whole plethora of Higgs bosons out there that are too heavy for us to see with our current generation of particle colliders. (The mass-energy thing goes back to Einstein’s famous E=mc^2 equation, which shows that energy is mass and mass is energy. The higher a particle’s mass, the more energy it has and the more energy it takes to create that hefty thing.)

In fact, some speculative theories that push our knowledge of physics beyond the Standard Model do predict the existence of these heavy Higgs bosons. The exact nature of these additional Higgs characters depends on the theory, of course, ranging anywhere from simply one or two extra-heavy Higgs fields to even composite structures made of multiple different kinds of Higgs bosons stuck together.

Theorists are hard at work trying to find any possible way to test these theories, since most of them are simply inaccessible to current experiments. In a recent paper submitted to the Journal of High Energy Physics, and published online in the preprint journal arXiv, a team of physicists has advanced a proposal to search for the existence of more Higgs bosons, based on the peculiar way the particles might decay into lighter, more easily-recognizable particles, such as electrons, neutrinos and photons. However, these decays are extremely rare, so that while we can in principle find them with the LHC, it will take many more years of searching to collect enough data.

When it comes to the heavy Higgs, we’re just going to have to be patient.

Originally published on Live Science.

via Space.com http://bit.ly/2WPkkGi

June 8, 2019 at 07:54AM

Michael Bloomberg will spend $500 million to close coal-fired power plants

https://www.engadget.com/2019/06/07/michael-bloomberg-beyond-coal-500-million-close-power-plants/

Michael Bloomberg is pledging $500 million to close every coal-fired power plant in the US and to halt the growth of natural gas. According to The New York Times, the money will go towards a new Beyond Coal initiative. It will be spent over the next three decades, and it will fund lobbying efforts aimed at state and local government officials.

Bloomberg plans to bypass Washington, where the Trump Administration is both committed to coal power and denying warnings from climate scientists. "We’re in a race against time with climate change, and yet there is virtually no hope of bold federal action on this issue for at least another two years," Bloomberg reportedly said in a statement. "Mother Nature is not waiting on our political calendar, and neither can we."

In addition to targeting the remaining 241 coal plants in the US, the funding will also go towards promoting wind, solar and other renewable power. It will also help elect local lawmakers who prioritize clean energy, The New York Times says.

While renewables are on the rise, so is the demand for fossil fuels — though the US coal industry saw little growth in recent years. At the same time, the UN says climate change is much worse than first thought, and we could see a massive crisis starting in 2040. As long as President Trump clings to coal and the administration works to cut funding for renewable energy, it might be up to private investors to lead the way toward reform.

Source: The New York Times

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

June 7, 2019 at 11:51AM

Millions of machines affected by command execution flaw in Exim mail server

https://arstechnica.com/?p=1518247

Close-up photo of police-style caution tape stretched across an out-of-focus background.

Millions of Internet-connected machines running the open source Exim mail server may be vulnerable to a newly disclosed vulnerability that, in some cases, allows unauthenticated attackers to execute commands with all-powerful root privileges.

The flaw, which dates back to version 4.87 released in April 2016, is trivially exploitable by local users with a low-privileged account on a vulnerable system running with default settings. All that’s required is for the person to send an email to "${run{…}}@localhost," where "localhost" is an existing local domain on a vulnerable Exim installation. With that, attackers can execute commands of their choice that run with root privileges.

The command execution flaw is also exploitable remotely, albeit with some restrictions. The most likely scenario for remote exploits is when default settings have been made such as:

  • The "verify = recipient" is removed manually by an administrator, possibly to prevent username enumeration using RCPT TO functions. In such a case, the local exploitation method above works.
  • Exim is configured to recognize tags in the local part of a recipient’s address (through "local_part_suffix = +* : -*" for example). Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by reusing the local exploit method with an RCPT TO "balrog+${run{…}}@localhost" (where "balrog" is the name of a local user).
  • Exim is configured to relay mail to a remote domain, as a secondary MX. A remote attacker can reuse the local-exploitation method with an RCPT TO "${run{…}}@khazad.dum" where "khazad.dum" is one of Exim’s relay_to_domains.

The vulnerability is also remotely exploitable against default Exim setups, although an attacker first must keep a connection to the vulnerable server open for seven days, by transmitting one byte every few minutes. Researchers from Qualys, the security firm that discovered the vulnerability, didn’t rule out other, simpler and more practical ways to remotely exploit default setups.

"This vulnerability is trivially exploitable in the local and non-default cases (attackers will have working exploits before that, public or not)," Qualys researchers wrote in an advisory published on Wednesday. "And in the default case, a remote attack takes a long time to succeed (to the best of our knowledge)."

The vulnerability, which is tracked as CVE-2019-10149, affects versions 4.87 through 4.91. The flaw was fixed in version 4.92, which was released in February. But it was never identified as a vulnerability. What’s more, many distributions of Linux have continued to ship with vulnerable Exim versions.

A search on BinaryEdge (a service that indexes Internet-connected devices) showed that more than 4.7 million machines are running a vulnerable Exim version. It’s a good bet that a non-trivial percentage of these machines are susceptible to the attacks. Updates to version 4.92 are available here.

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

June 6, 2019 at 08:44PM