NASA’s New Titanium Airless Tires Are Nearly Indestructible

Stretch a Slinky toy too far, and eventually the metal coil will be warped so much it won’t be able to return to its original spring shape. That’s a problem also faced by the metal spring tires designed to roll across our Moon, and other planets our rovers are exploring. But NASA has created an alternative, made from titanium, that can tackle any terrain and always return to its original tire shape.

Because puncturing an inflatable tire while driving around the surface of the Moon would have been a disaster, the Lunar Rover, delivered by Apollo 15, instead featured airless tires made of hollow metal springs. They absorb bumps like a rubber air-filled tire does, but over time, those metal springs get warped and deformed until they’re misshapen and don’t roll as efficiently.

What’s happening is that over time, the bonds between the atomic structures that make up the materials in a metal spring tire are stretched to the point where they can’t return to their original arrangement, which is a problem when repair technicians are millions of miles away from a vehicle.

The solution to the problem is a new type of metal spring tire made from a nickel titanium alloy whose atomic bonds are instead re-arranged as the tire deforms and stretches when rolling over uneven terrain. Known as “shape memory alloys” the metals are assembled in what looks like a tire made from chain mail whose structure can be compressed right to the hub and still spring back to its original shape afterwards.

The advantage to using a tire like this here on Earth is immediately obvious, especially if you’ve ever had to change a flat tire on the side of the road in the cold of night. But having a tire that can last for years with minimal maintenance is even more important when sending rovers to the other planets in our Solar System. The tires used for the Curiosity Rover deteriorated faster than expected, and when you’re spending hundreds of millions of dollars to send an autonomous explorer to another world, the last thing you want to derail your experiment is a damaged tire.

[Vimeo via designboom]

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2iO3mX5
via IFTTT

What Amazon Echo and Google Home Do With Your Voice Data—And How to Delete It

Amazon Echo and Google Home—and other devices that have Alexa and Google Assistant built in—are some of the most promising new technologies to come along in years. And they’re genuinely useful to have around, whether it’s to settle a bet or help out with a recipe. But it can also feel a little creepy to have a speaker in your house that’s always listening. What exactly is it doing with that info? Where does it go?

Here’s the good news. While their microphones are always on, Google Home and Alexa don’t actually do anything with your voice until you say their “wake word,” which is usually just ‘OK Google’ or ‘Alexa’. Despite the occasional viral story that suggests otherwise, Amazon and Google truly aren’t keeping track of every single thing you say.

After you say your wake word, though, your Alexa and Google Assistant do start recording, and then whisk those clips away to the cloud. The hardware itself is pretty dumb. In order to let you know with a snap who the 23rd president was, or what the weather will be like tomorrow, or to play a Dokken deep cut, voice assistants need to be able to pull information from the entire internet. That means a faraway server somewhere is what actually handles your request.

And on that server they’ll stay, unless you actively delete them. Which, fortunately, isn’t all that hard. Amazon and Google let you see what requests they’ve logged. In your Alexa app, go to Settings > History to see what Amazon has on file, and to delete them one by one. If you’d rather do a mass purge, head here and go to Your Devices > Echo Dot > Manage voice recordings. A pop-up will give you the chance to clear out the whole stash.

For Google Assistant, go to myactivity.google.com. That’s also where you can delete your voice requests, if you don’t want them lurking on corporate servers somewhere. Click on the three-dot line in the upper-right corner, then Delete activity by. From there, you can set a date range—today, yesterday, last 7 days, last 30 days, all time, or custom—and the service whose interactions you want to nuke. Click on All products, then Voice & Audio, then hit Delete. You’ll get a pop-up that asks if you’re absolutely positively sure you want to go through with it. Click OK, because you do. Then do the same for Assistant while you’re in there, just to be thorough. (There are 19 additional categories, ranging from Ads all the way down to YouTube, if you want to linger and take stock of just how much time you’ve spent with Google lately.)

And if you’re still anxious about Echo and Home, remember that both come equipped with a handy mute button. The Echo’s is on top; Google Home’s is in the back. Just remember that if they can’t listen to you at all, they’re basically fancy paperweights.

from Wired Top Stories http://ift.tt/2hOVDqI
via IFTTT

Tesla Should Consider Building This Car Powered By a Giant Mouse Trap

On its quest to free the world from the burden of fossil fuels, Tesla has unfortunately hit some speed bumps with the production of its Model 3. So instead of relying on batteries and electricity for power, perhaps the company should consider this four-wheeled contraption which runs on a gigantic spring-powered mouse trap.

Based on a simple science experiment that many of us tried in grade school, Kevin Kohler—aka the Backyard Scientist—used the oversized mouse trap he built earlier this year as the engine for a very-basic roadster. Its top speed is disappointing and its range is abysmal, but you’ll never need to remember to plug it in at night, or fill it up every few days. Even better, as far as I know, there’s no waiting list to get one.

[YouTube]

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2hZ7Jl5
via IFTTT

Uber hit with 2 lawsuits over gigantic 2016 data breach

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2hYybLK
via IFTTT

Tesla announces truck prices lower than experts predicted

Tesla

Steve Levine, an Axios journalist who wrote a whole book about battery technologies, wrote a few days ago that “experts estimate that the Semi could be $300,000.” MIT Technology Review speculated that the Semi would cost even more: $400,000.

So a lot of people were surprised on Thursday when Tesla posted estimated prices for its Semi product. According to the company, a low-end truck with a 300 mile range will cost around $150,000, while you’ll be able to get a range of 500 miles for $180,000. A premium “Founders Series” truck will cost $200,000.

That’s more than the $120,000 cost of a typical conventional truck. But Tesla says that its truck will deliver $200,000 in fuel and maintenance costs over the life of the vehicle. If that’s true, paying an extra $30,000 to $60,000 for the truck would be a bargain.

Tesla is labeling these as “expected” prices, and the truck isn’t due to launch until 2019. Elon Musk has a track record of setting overly ambitious goals and blowing through deadlines. So we shouldn’t be surprised if the first deliveries slip into 2020 and a truck with 500 miles of range costs a bit more than $180,000.

Still, Tesla probably wouldn’t be teasing prices this low unless it had some reason to think it could deliver some dramatic price reductions.

Battery math

The key issue here is battery costs. Batteries are expensive, and it takes a lot of power to drive a fully-loaded semi. Tesla says that its trucks consume “less than 2 kWh per mile,” so a 500-mile semi could require as much as 1,000 kWh of battery capacity. A Tesla executive stated last year that its battery pack costs were below $190 per kWh. At that price, 1,000 kWh of batteries would cost $190,000, putting the total cost of a truck in the neighborhood of $300,000.

But Tesla might be giving itself wiggle room with that 2 kWh per mile figure, and battery costs have continued to fall since last year. In April, another expert told Levine that a 500-mile truck might only need 500 kWh of battery capacity, and that batteries could cost as little as $120 per kWh, making the total cost of the battery around $70,000.

That’s right in line with Tesla’s expected costs for the Semi battery. The $30,000 cost difference between the 300 and 500-mile versions of the Tesla truck suggests that Tesla believes it can get a 200-mile range for $30,000, which translates to $75,000 for a 500-mile battery.

One complication here is Tesla’s promise that the truck will be able to operate for a million miles without breaking down. Levine says an insider told him that this guarantee includes the battery. That’s surprising because a typical lithium-ion battery is good for 1,000 charge cycles—which would mean the 500-mile truck would need a new battery after 500,000 miles.

In an interview with Levine, Stanford researcher Tony Seba pointed out one way to get a longer range:  “If you don’t fully charge and discharge a battery, it’s going to last far longer.” So perhaps Tesla is putting extra batteries on the truck, allowing it to charge and discharge slowly and never be fully drained. But of course that makes the battery more expensive.

Fortunately, Tesla has good reason to expect battery prices to continue falling over the next two to three years.

High-tech products almost always fall in cost as they are manufactured at higher volumes. And that’s been happening surprisingly quickly with batteries. A McKinsey study last year found battery costs had fallen from almost $1,000 in 2010 to $230 six years later. If costs continue to fall at that rate over the next three years, we can expect costs to be well under $100 per kWh by 2020, putting Tesla’s ambitious truck price targets comfortably within reach.

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2zAelxH
via IFTTT

Shot for Shot: Movie Scenes That Inspired “Stranger Things” Season 2

Shot for Shot: Movie Scenes That Inspired “Stranger Things” Season 2




“Stranger Things” Season 2 is filled with retro movie references, including parallels to ‘Stand By Me,’ ‘Aliens,’ ‘Indiana Jones,’ ‘Gremlins,’ ‘Star Wars’ and more. Here’s a shot for shot comparison from the team over at IMDB.

[IMDB]

































Advertisement
























from [Geeks Are Sexy] Technology News http://ift.tt/2BeIJei
via IFTTT