The FDA asked a supplement company to recall all their products. Here’s what you need to know.

https://www.popsci.com/herbal-doctor-remedies-recall/

Supplement companies do a lot to try to convince you they're safe and effective—but sometimes they can be neither.

Supplement companies do a lot to try to convince you they’re safe and effective—but sometimes they can be neither. (Deposit Photos/)

On Wednesday the Food and Drug Administration announced a voluntary recall by the company Herbal Doctor Remedies, a brand of herbal supplements distributed by several online retailers. What’s surprising about this recall is that it includes all of Herbal Doctor Remedies products. So, the first takeaway is obvious: if you have any products manufactured by this company, throw them away. Contact a physician (and file a report with the FDA) if you suspect you’ve had any side-effects to them. Contact the company if you’re hoping to get some kind of refund, though of course your results may vary.

But you may be wondering what prompted such a sweeping and troubling recall—as well you should. Here are a few things to know about what went wrong with Herbal Doctor Remedies, as well as what this incident can teach you about supplements in general.

Why the recall?

The FDA hasn’t cited any specific manufacturing problems, but reports that Herbal Doctor Remedies failed to follow Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs). The FDA doesn’t have oversight over dietary supplements in the same way it does actual drugs, but the CGMPs exist to ensure that products contain what their packaging claims they contain and in the right quantities. That also covers things they shouldn’t contain, like pesticides or random contaminants. There are a lot of ways a company can fail to meet the CGMPs, but the easiest way to attract the FDA’s ire on this is to have a factory that doesn’t meet adequate cleanliness standards, or to have a manufacturing process that leaves too much opportunity for error.

Herbal Doctor Remedies has a second offense, too: they’re marketed without FDA approval in a way that could put consumers at risk. The FDA doesn’t approve supplements before they go to market, and generally only steps in if customers are reporting adverse effects (which wasn’t the case here). But supplements only get to enjoy that easy-breezy regulatory status if they distinguish themselves from drugs (which, as its name suggests, the FDA regulates quite heavily). Herbal Doctor Remedies is a classic example of the thin line between a perfectly legal supplement and an extremely illegal drug. It all comes down to labeling.

What are supplements allowed to say they can do?

The FDA has some rather complex guidelines for how foods and dietary supplements can market their benefits. It’s fine, for example, for a fiber supplement to say on its packaging that fiber is good for gut health and regularity. We have lots of evidence to support this. If a large body of experts like the National Academy of Sciences says X is good for preventing Y, that’s generally fair game as well. When it comes to basic benefits a vitamin or mineral can give you, as long as a company isn’t misrepresenting how their product fits in (saying, for instance, that a cereal with 1 gram of fiber is good for your gut because of how great fiber is), most claims are fine.

But supplements can’t claim to treat or prevent a specific disease. Something that treats or prevents a specific disease is a drug. And the FDA has to evaluate drugs to determine their safety and efficacy.

Herbal Doctor Remedies tripped this wire several times over, and you need only look at the company’s product names to see how: they sell "Worm Off," "Deafness Off," "Sperm Booster," and "Stomach Flu," to list just a few.

There’s nothing wrong with selling people deworming pills or antivirals, but if you’re telling someone that the product they’re buying will get rid of their intestinal parasites or cure their influenza, the FDA wants proof that this is at least reasonably true. Otherwise, there’s a chance people will forego medical attention or prescribed pharmaceuticals in favor of your product. This might sometimes turn out okay, but if your claims are unfounded and not based on solid evidence, your product is putting that customer’s health in serious peril.

If you don’t use any untested ingredients and don’t claim to treat or prevent a disease, efficacy doesn’t matter. Supplements just have to manage not to hurt a bunch of people and avoid lying (or at least getting caught lying) about what they contain. If that sounds like a low bar, it is.

How do I know the supplements I’m taking are effective?

You don’t! That’s the rather shocking truth about supplements in the United States. Companies are tasked with policing themselves on efficacy and safety. Unlisted fillers in lieu of promised ingredients are common, which opens the door to all sorts of risks—allergic reactions, unexpected interactions between medications, and toxic contaminants, for example. According to a 2017 study, the U.S. Poison Control Centers get calls about bad reactions to supplements about every 24 minutes. The FDA is supposed to step in when supplements are causing harm, but it’s basically an honor system—and lots of companies don’t report their customers’ complaints.

Should I take supplements at all?

Lots of supplements are harmless or even beneficial. But you have to confirm their safety and efficacy yourself. The United States Pharmacopeial Convention runs a voluntary testing program to confirm labels are accurate and manufactured safely, so picking a company that opts in is a no-brainer.

It’s important to note that while we need certain vitamins and minerals to survive, we’re (mostly) better off getting them from balanced diets full of as many whole, unprocessed foods as possible. There are certain conditions that can benefit from supplements, but that’s something you should get a physician’s advice on. Sometimes even safe and well-made medications can cause harm: experts now say daily aspirin is a mistake for most adults, too many antioxidants can actually encourage cancerous cell growth, and excess vitamin D can give you kidney stones and make your bones weak. In other words, you shouldn’t assume any daily medication, whether it’s an OTC drug or an herbal supplement, is a better-safe-than-sorry addition to your morning routine.

If you know a company is trustworthy, this graphic from Information Is Beautiful can help you suss out just how much evidence there is that a supplement does what you want it to. For instance, you’ll see that omega 3 is very likely effective in lowering risk of preterm birth, while evidence that it lowers the risk of colorectal cancer is merely "promising." The same substance’s effect on cardiovascular disease is slightly less well-supported—it’s "inconclusive" and needs more research—and evidence suggests it has no effect against Crohn’s disease, asthma, or diabetes. Omega 3 also makes an appearance on the "harmful" side of the chart, because fish oil intake is linked with increased prostate cancer risk. All of this is to say that there are lots of things that supplement companies can gently suggest their products can do for you, but the truth is a lot more complicated.

via Popular Science – New Technology, Science News, The Future Now https://www.popsci.com

July 25, 2019 at 11:10AM

Hey, Netflix, How About You Give Us a $3 Mobile-Only Plan Too

https://gizmodo.com/hey-netflix-how-about-you-give-us-a-3-mobile-only-pl-1836662123

Image: Pascal Le Segretain (Getty)

Netflix has finally unveiled its new, comparatively cheaper mobile-only plan in India—and honestly? This kind of seems like something that a lot of its U.S. users could get on board with.

The company announced on Wednesday the rollout of its new INR 199 (a little less than $3 USD) plan, which will be the fourth and cheapest subscription tier for Netflix in the market. Netflix said the plan will give users access to all of the content on its platform and will stream in standard definition (HD and Ultra HD are available for streaming with more expensive plans).

“Our members in India watch more on their mobiles than members anywhere else in the world—and they love to download our shows and films. We believe this new plan will make Netflix even more accessible and better suit people who like to watch on their smartphones and tablets—both on the go and at home,” Ajay Arora, a director of product at Netflix, said in a statement.

This is, to be sure, a slightly pared-down version of the Netflix you’re likely familiar with if you have anything other than a basic subscription plan. For one, it allows streaming from just one mobile device or tablet at once, which means this is not the Netflix you’ll be able to share with (or mooch from) friends and lovers.

But the plan also clocks in at roughly $9 less than the premium plan in India based on current conversion rates. Assuming you’re watching Netflix exclusively on your phone, don’t care to be bothered with HD, and don’t feel like sharing your account? This is a pretty sweet deal for access to the streaming giant’s massive (if not somewhat mediocre) content library.

Netflix said last year it would begin testing lower-priced plans in order to expand its appeal in Asia and other markets. Unfortunately for those of us to whom this mobile-only plan appeals, TechCrunch cited Netflix officials speaking from a press conference in India as saying that the company does not currently have plans to expand the mobile-only plan to other markets. The company did not immediately respond to Gizmodo’s request for comment.

While any mobile-only plan here in the U.S. would likely clock in at slightly more than $3—India’s premium plan runs INR 799/month (roughly $12) while ours in the U.S. costs about $16. Even, say, $5 seems like a pretty good streaming deal for someone who only streams from their phone or tablet. The next best option in the U.S. is a $9 basic plan, which is also limited to standard definition streaming and only allows for one screen at a time.

So Netflix, what’s up? Why not do us a solid and give us a mobile-only option too so we can shave a few bucks off our increasingly expensive streaming service habit? God knows you could use the subscribers.

via Gizmodo https://gizmodo.com

July 24, 2019 at 10:54AM

Back from the Moon, Apollo Astronauts Had to Go Through Customs

https://www.space.com/7044-moon-apollo-astronauts-customs.html

A copy of the U.S. Customs form filled out by Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins after their return to Earth on July 24, 1969.

A copy of the U.S. Customs form filled out by Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins after their return to Earth on July 24, 1969.

(Image credit: NASA/U.S. Customs and Border Patrol.)

Before the ticker tape parades and the inevitable world tour, the triumphant Apollo 11 astronauts were greeted with a more mundane aspect of life on Earth when they splashed down 50 years ago today (July 24) — going through customs.

Just what did Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins have to declare? Moon rocks, moon dust and other lunar samples, according to the customs form filed at the Honolulu Airport in Hawaii on July 24, 1969 — the day the Apollo 11 crew splashed down in the Pacific Ocean to end their historic moon landing mission.

The customs form is signed by all three Apollo 11 astronauts. They declared their cargo and listed their flight route as starting Cape Kennedy (now Cape Canaveral) in Florida with a stopover on the moon.

Related: Apollo 11 at 50: A Complete Guide to the Historic Moon Landing

The form was posted to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection website in 2009 to mark the Apollo 11 mission’s 40th anniversary. A copy was obtained by Space.com at the time and verified by NASA.

“Yes, it’s authentic,” NASA spokesperson John Yembrick told Space.com. “It was a little joke at the time.”

It’s more humor than fact, because Apollo 11 splashed down 920 miles (1,480 km) southwest of Hawaii and 13 miles (21 km) from the USS Hornet, a Navy ship sent to recover the crew. It took two more days for the astronauts to actually return to Hawaii on July 26, where they were welcomed with a July 27 ceremony at Pearl Harbor.

The catch? The astronauts were trapped inside a NASA trailer as part of a quarantine effort just in case they brought back any germs or diseases from the moon. They even wore special biological containment suits when they walked out on the deck of the USS Hornet after being retrieved.

NASA transported them to Houston, quarantine trailer and all, and they emerged from isolation three weeks later. (Nowadays, astronauts returning from space exit their spacecraft almost immediately, though some long-duration astronauts receive medical checks after spending months in weightlessness.)

President Richard Nixon welcomes the quarantined Apollo 11 astronauts aboard the USS Hornet after they splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on July 24, 1969. 

President Richard Nixon welcomes the quarantined Apollo 11 astronauts aboard the USS Hornet after they splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on July 24, 1969. 

(Image credit: NASA)

Today, NASA astronauts still have to go through customs, but for more conventional reasons.

Astronauts on missions headed for the International Space Station must train not only in the U.S., but also in Japan, Canada, Europe and Russia in order practice with the different systems, modules and tools they’ll use while visiting the outpost, which is the product of 20 years of space construction by 16 different countries.

Two Russian Soyuz crew vehicles, a Russian Progress cargo spacecraft and a Northrop Grumman Cygnus cargo spacecraft are currently docked at the International Space Station. Space station crews launching on Russian Soyuz spacecraft have to make their way to the Central Asian spaceport of the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.

No matter what the mission, even astronauts have to go through customs, NASA officials said. As part of their routine airline flights to other countries and back, they of course encounter airport customs.

“They do have a government passport, but they do have to go through customs,” NASA spokesperson Nicole Cloutier-Lemasters told Space.com. “Just like the rest of us.”

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published in 2009 and updated for the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 mission in 2019. 

Have a news tip, correction or comment? Let us know at community@space.com.

via Space.com https://ift.tt/2CqOJ61

July 24, 2019 at 06:11AM

Alphabet’s internet balloons have spent a million hours in the stratosphere

https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/23/alphabet-loon-internet-balloons-1-million-hours-google/

The fledgling internet balloon industry just marked an important achievement. Alphabet’s Loon has recorded over 1 million hours of stratospheric flight for its balloons, covering about 24.9 million miles. The figures aren’t completely shocking when they’ve been pressed into service for hard-hit areas like Puerto Rico and Peru, but it’s still significant when the technology only graduated from project status one year earlier.

The record comes in part through the way the balloons operate. Instead of fighting the wind, they use AI to change their altitude and ride currents to their destination. That leads to routes that can be long and winding, but don’t require massive amounts of energy. Loon even encourages its balloons to "stroll" so that they provide more consistent internet access.

Broadband balloons are still in their early stages and have seen only limited adoption elsewhere. Satellites have been in vogue lately. With that said, the milestone shows that they’re viable. It may just be a matter of how widespread their use becomes, rather than whether or not they have a future in the first place.

Source: Loon (Medium)

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

July 23, 2019 at 01:48PM

Renault mines nostalgia for its latest electric concept car

https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/24/renault-e-plein-air-concept-car/

Much as Ford and Honda are doing with Mustang and Civic inspired EVs, Renault is going nostalgic by building an electric version of the beloved, best-selling 4L (Quatrelle), aka the Renault 4. The e-Plein Air (meaning "open air") is based on the 1968-69 Plein Air, a topless, doorless beach-friendly version of the 4L that only sold 563 copies.

It’ll be equipped with the Renault Twizy 80‘s drivetrain and 6.1kWh battery, so while it won’t go very far or fast, the 62 miles of range and 60 mph top speed should be more than enough for cruising the dunes of Normandy.

The Renault 4 arrived in 1961 as a response to Citroën’s famous 2CV, aka the "Deux Chevaux" ("two horsepower"). It was Renault’s first car with front-wheel drive and a fully independent suspension, making it perfect for rural roads in France and around the world. Renault sold eight million copies by the time production ceased in 1992. The Plein Air, meanwhile, came along via a request by the military and in response to Citroën’s Méhari.

Renault said that the EV version drives much like the original 4L, even though it has a slightly shortened wheelbase. It’s building the e-Plein Air (pronounced "plahn air") strictly as a concept for now, "but we will of course be attentive to the reactions of enthusiasts and potential customers in view of the car," the company said.

Source: Renault (Facebook)

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

July 24, 2019 at 10:30AM

Report: Nintendo quietly owns up to “Joy-Con drift,” will repair for free

https://arstechnica.com/?p=1540681

One guess as to how Nintendo will repair Joy-Con controllers suffering from a widely reported drift issue.
Enlarge /

One guess as to how Nintendo will repair Joy-Con controllers suffering from a widely reported drift issue.

Nintendo / Sam Machkovech

After months of mounting user complaints and media pressure, Nintendo appears to have finally caved in full to the issue of “Joy-Con drift” on its Nintendo Switch controllers.

Tuesday’s news comes courtesy of Vice Games senior reporter Patrick Klepek one day after a lengthy summary of the issue went live at Kotaku. Klepek’s report claims that if Switch owners report incorrect joystick data being fed to their consoles due to faulty joysticks, Nintendo’s customer service reps are authorized to offer a completely free, outside-of-warranty repair of affected controllers (after walking users through a troubleshooting process).

What’s more, according to Klepek, if users recently sought such a repair and were charged for the trouble, Nintendo’s reps may be able to offer those users a refund. Klepek cites “a source familiar with Nintendo’s updated customer support documentation.”

Joy-Con drift is a lot like that phrase sounds: even when a Switch controller’s joystick stays perfectly still, it may send movement data to your Switch. The system may also “resist” the direction you’re pressing in favor of a stuck direction. Due to the potentially mechanical issue of the failure, a simple system-menu joystick recalibration won’t fix it for affected users.

If this issue sounds familiar, that’s because Switch users have been complaining about it on various forums for months. Kotaku’s Monday article linked to a July 2018 post at Reddit, whose author alleged that they had sent eight Joy-Con controllers to Nintendo for the sake of joystick repairs. A lengthy April 2019 video from Spawn Wave includes a teardown of an affected Joy-Con controller to show exactly how the hardware’s current design leads to wear and tear on specific contact points, which is as good of a technical explanation for the defect as we’ve seen.

After all, Nintendo hasn’t formally commented on the exact cause of this issue (which I admittedly haven’t been able to reproduce in my six official Joy-Con controllers). In response to Vice’s questions about the reported drift issues, and the authenticity of Vice’s own report, Nintendo sent the following statement. Ars’ questions about the authenticity of the Vice report received the same statement in response:

At Nintendo, we take great pride in creating quality products and we are continuously making improvements to them. We are aware of recent reports that some Joy-Con controllers are not responding correctly. We want our consumers to have fun with Nintendo Switch, and if anything falls short of this goal we always encourage them to visit https://ift.tt/LEV4gs so we can help.

The news follows years of complaints about another Switch gamepad, the Nintendo Switch Pro Controller, which has suffered from a “mushy” d-pad since it launched alongside the Switch hardware in March 2017. I can report personal experience with that issue, as I sent both my retail Switch Pro pad and its first customer-service replacement back to Nintendo following my own complaints of unwieldy d-pad performance in early 2017. Users have gone on to suggest

a “tape” fix

, which requires opening up the Pro controller and affixing clear tape to any, or all, of the contacts where the d-pad touches the controller’s circuit board.

Another example of an early 2017 Joy-Con problem came in the form of wireless performance, which users took into their own hands with a single-wire soldering fix.

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

July 23, 2019 at 07:43PM

Rivian ‘Tank Turn’ is exactly what it sounds like

https://www.autoblog.com/2019/07/23/rivian-r1t-pickup-tank-turn-video/

Video has surfaced of a Rivian R1T doing a “tank turn” — that is, spinning in place like a tracked vehicle. It’s clearly CGI, but the video was apparently made for Rivian by one of the electric carmaker’s ad or marketing agencies. And although the provenance and computer imagery could imply a hoax, the EV startup has itself talked up such a feature. TechCrunch ran a piece last December saying, “Rivian trademarked terms ‘tank turn’ and ‘tank steer’ referring to independently moving wheels that can enable extremely tight turns. [Rivian CEO R.J.] Scaringe confirmed that this feature would be available on the R1S, the R1T, and future quad-drive vehicles.”

According to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Rivian filed to trademark Tank Turn and Tank Steer on Oct. 24, 2018, but both applications are dead. That feature, however, remains possible, since the R1T and R1S utilize four independent motors at the wheels; there’s no reason they can’t rotate the vehicles in place to avoid, as in the video, a washed-out road. And since Rivian filed for the vehicle names R1A, R1C, R2A, R2C, R2R, and R2S, there are likely a few more off-road-capable offerings that could make use of the trick — especially that rumored Rivian rally car.

We imagine there’ll be a few restrictions imposed in the fine print, such as not pulling the maneuver on paved roads or other high-grip surfaces. A commenter on another article wrote, “Brian Gase from Rivian confirmed to me that this feature will be on dirt/gravel only. In his words, if you do this on pavement you will ‘break shit,'” Gase being Rivian’s chief engineer. Of course, the Audi RS3 converted to electric power with four Formula E motors and 1,183 horsepower spun quite the burnout-in-place before burning rubber out of frame, and didn’t seem to have a problem, so anything is possible. We’re eager to see what Rivian’s come up with.

via Autoblog https://ift.tt/1afPJWx

July 23, 2019 at 05:34PM