Judge Slashes Payout in Roundup Lawsuit, But Calls Monsanto’s Conduct ‘Reprehensible’

https://earther.gizmodo.com/judge-slashes-payout-in-roundup-lawsuit-but-calls-mons-1836397910

Roundup on sale in San Francisco, 2019.
Photo: Haven Daley ( (AP)

A federal judge in one of the lawsuits between pharmaceutical giant AG Bayer, which bought agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018, and plaintiffs who claim its Roundup herbicide caused their cancer has slashed an $80 million payout, Reuters reported on Monday.

According to Reuters, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco found that while evidence supports a $5.27 million in compensatory damages owed by Bayer to Edwin Hardeman, punitive damages should be reduced from $75 million to $20 million. Chhabria wrote that Monsanto “deserves to be punished” for ignoring safety concerns and its conduct was “reprehensible.” But he also found the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages was too high, “particularly in the absence of evidence showing intentional concealment of a known or obvious safety risk.”

The Wall Street Journal reported that while Chhabria found mixed scientific evidence as to whether Roundup exposure is a risk factor for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, he wrote “the evidence at trial painted the picture of a company focused on attacking or undermining the people who raised concerns.” The paper noted that while Bayer has lost two additional cases involving Roundup (in one case involving a jury award of over $2 billion) and is facing thousands of others, it has had success limiting payouts:

Bayer similarly succeeded in having a trial judge slash the first Roundup jury verdict in the case of a San Francisco Bay Area groundskeeper, to $78.5 million from $289.2 million. The company is now appealing that slimmed-down amount. Bayer is asking a judge to reduce a third jury verdict, also in Northern California, of more than $2 billion awarded in May to a couple who used Roundup at their home.

In Mr. Hardeman’s trial, unlike in the other two, jurors first weighed whether science showed a link between Roundup and his non-Hodgkin lymphoma before turning to the question of Monsanto’s liability… The trio of jury verdicts and 13,000 additional claims tying Roundup to cancer have sent German-based Bayer into turmoil. Its shares have lost over 30% in value over the past year as investors worry the legal battle could take years to resolve and end up costing Bayer billions.

According to Reuters, Chhabria emphasized that he was required to reduce the punitive damages due to precedent set by the Supreme Court, but he felt the jury’s original award was reasonable. 

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) deemed Roundup’s key ingredient, glyphosate, a “probable carcinogen” in 2015—a stance supported by a study this year finding glyphosate exposure was associated with significantly higher risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Hardeman says that he used the herbicide on a large property north of San Francisco for over two decades.

Monsanto insists that Roundup is safe, but court documents have shown it had a hand in overseeing supposedly “independent” evaluations of its safety. The Environmental Protection Agency’s official position is also that Roundup is safe when used according to label instructions, though an EPA official formerly responsible for evaluating its safety has faced allegations of an suspiciously cozy relationship with Monsanto.

That said, there is disagreement on how much of a risk Roundup truly poses. University of California, Riverside toxicologist David Eastmond, author of a glyphosate review for the World Health Organization’s Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues, told NPR earlier this year that the IARC had simply found that the chemical could cause cancer without evaluating how likely it is to pose a risk to the public.

“From my reading of things, if glyphosate causes cancer, it’s a pretty weak carcinogen, which means that you’re going to need pretty high doses in order to cause it,” Eastmond told NPR, adding that he had based his conclusions in part on a large number of Monsanto-funded studies not considered by the IARC.

“We are pleased that the judge denied Monsanto’s motion to throw out the verdict, and recognized that Monsanto deserved to be punished,” Jennifer Moore, a member of Hardeman’s legal team, told Reuters. “We disagree with any reduction in the jury verdict.”

Backlash against Roundup is building elsewhere as well. Austrian legislators recently approved a total ban on glyphosate, positioning it to be the first member state of the European Union to do so and creating the possibility of other nations following suit. 

via Gizmodo https://gizmodo.com

July 15, 2019 at 10:48PM

SpaceX nears completion of Dragon investigation, has a “good path forward”

https://arstechnica.com/?p=1536441

A 2018 view of the clean room where the spacecraft for the first crewed Dragon mission was nearing completion. It will now be used for an In-Flight Abort test instead.
Enlarge /

A 2018 view of the clean room where the spacecraft for the first crewed Dragon mission was nearing completion. It will now be used for an In-Flight Abort test instead.

Eric Berger

On Monday, officials from SpaceX and NASA provided an update on the investigation of an anomaly that occurred in April, which destroyed a Crew Dragon spacecraft. Generally, they were upbeat with their assessment: “I’m pretty optimistic right now, because we have a good path forward,” said Hans Koenigsmann, SpaceX’s vice president of mission assurance.

After nearly three months of work—which has included the collection of debris from the ground-based incident, assessing large volumes of data, and a series of tests at SpaceX’s rocket development facility in McGregor, Texas—the company is about 80% complete with its analysis, Koenigsmann said. He characterized the findings discussed Monday as “preliminary.”

The accident occurred during tests of the Crew Dragon’s thruster systems in Florida. The capsule has “Draco” thrusters used to maneuver in space as well as powerful “SuperDracos.” They would fire in the event of an emergency with the rocket to pull the crew safely away during a launch. Specifically, the April 20 anomaly occurred during the activation phase of the SuperDraco thruster system, when it is pressurized and valves are opened and closed.

Approximately 100 milliseconds prior to ignition of Crew Dragon’s eight SuperDraco thrusters, a leaking component allowed about one cup of liquid oxidizer—nitrogen tetroxide—or NTO—into the wrong fuel tank plumbing.

“A slug of this NTO was driven through a helium check valve at high speed during rapid initialization of the launch escape system, resulting in structural failure within the check valve,” the company said in a statement. “The failure of the titanium component in a high-pressure NTO environment was sufficient to cause ignition of the check valve and led to an explosion.”

Koenigsmann said the company is already taking steps to prevent such a problem from occurring again. This includes the use of “burst disks” instead of check valves to eliminate the possibility of any liquid propellant flowing into the gaseous pressurization system.

The hardware components needed to mitigate this problem are relatively straightforward, he said. What may take more time is the process of checking other fuel systems in Crew Dragon for similar vulnerabilities, as well as characterizing the basic physics of the NTO and titanium that ignited in this situation. “The hardware is probably the smaller part,” he said.

New schedule uncertain

After flying a virtually flawless uncrewed Dragon test mission to the International Space Station in February, SpaceX has been working toward a crewed flight of the vehicle (by NASA astronauts Doug Hurley and Bob Behnken) later this year. That now appears unlikely, but Koenigsmann was optimistic that this issue could be worked in parallel to several other challenges between Dragon and that flight, such as qualification of the spacecraft’s parachutes.

NASA’s chief of the commercial crew program, which is paying for and managing development of Crew Dragon and Boeing’s Starliner vehicles to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station, expressed satisfaction with the pace and quality of SpaceX’s investigation into the mishap.

“In a lot of ways, this was a gift for us,” said Kathy Lueders, the NASA manager. “It was a test on the ground, we had a lot of instrumentation on the vehicle, we had high-speed cameras, [and] we were able to get the hardware and the data. Through this process, we will continue to learn things that will help us fly safer.”

The company also confirmed its plan to use Crew Dragon spacecraft originally assigned to SpaceX’s first crewed mission to the International Space Station for an In-Flight Abort test—which will test the SuperDraco thrusters during an ascent to space. The spacecraft originally assigned to the first operational mission will now launch Hurley and Behnken on their demonstration flight.

Sources told Ars that SpaceX will probably do well to complete the In-Flight Abort test in 2019, with a crewed flight occurring early in 2020, provided all goes well during the abort test. On this schedule, the competition between SpaceX and Boeing to launch the first people into orbit from US soil since 2011’s retirement of the space shuttle will be very close.

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

July 15, 2019 at 05:30PM