SpaceX has now successfully landed 20 rockets [Updated]

Enlarge /

This is SpaceX’s 13th supply mission to the International Space Station.

NASA

11am ET Update: Friday’s launch went off without a hitch, with the Falcon 9 booster sending a Dragon spacecraft into a good orbit to reach the International Space Station. Then, the first stage safely—if a bit sooty—made a near-perfect landing back on Earth. This marks the company’s 20th successful landing overall, and 16th in a row.

Original post: SpaceX will attempt to send a cargo spacecraft to the International Space Station on Friday morning, with an instantaneous launch window that opens at 10:36am ET. There are some clouds at the launch site, but overall weather conditions appear favorable for a liftoff today.

Perhaps the bigger question is whether the technical problems with the launch have been solved. Originally targeted for Tuesday, SpaceX delayed a day to Wednesday for additional pre-launch ground systems checks. Then the company delayed until Friday because it had detected “particles” in the fuel system of the rocket’s second stage. As a result, it needed to conduct “full inspections and cleanings.”

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2kvTC3L
via IFTTT

World Health Organization clashes with DEA on marijuana compound CBD

Enlarge /

COLORADO SPRINGS, CO. – August 05, 2014: Janea Cox director of the Flowering H.O.P.E. Foundation, with her daughter Haleigh, who was diagnosed with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, looks at the plants that make Haleigh’s Hope, a cannabis oil high in cannabidiol, or CBD, that is helping control her seizures.

The US Drug Enforcement Administration has long held that the non-psychoactive component of marijuana, cannabidiol, is a schedule I drug. That is, a drug that has no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. But according to a preliminary report embraced by the World Health Organization this week, the DEA’s long-held stance is tripping.

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2Bfe7tG
via IFTTT

Stealth turns 40: Looking back at the first flight of Have Blue

Enlarge /

One of the two Have Blue prototypes sits in a hangar at Lockheed’s Skunk Works in Burbank, California in this 1978 photo. The aircraft was the first real “stealth” aircraft, designed to have a radar cross section the size of “an eagle’s eyeball”.

Lockheed Martin

On December 1, 1977, a truly strange bird took flight for the first time in the skies over a desolate corner of Nevada. Looking more like a giant faceted gemstone than something designed to lift-off, the aircraft (nicknamed the “Hopeless Diamond”) had been flown out to Groom Lake in parts aboard a Lockheed C-5 Galaxy cargo plane.

While much of the Hopeless Diamond was a conglomeration of spare parts from other existing aircraft, it was the first of a new breed—the progenitor of Stealth. Hopeless Diamond was the first of two technology demonstrators built for a program called “Have Blue,” an initiative program spawned from a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency effort to create an aircraft that could evade the Soviet Union’s increasingly sophisticated integrated air defense systems.

Forty years have passed since the Have Blue project’s two demonstrator aircraft—built on a relative shoestring budget by Lockheed’s Skunk Works—flew over the Nevada desert and ushered in a new era. Over time, the engineering, physics, and mathematics that created the Have Blue prototypes would be refined to create the F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter and serve as the basis for the designs of the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II.

This miltech evolution began because Lockheed was willing to internally fund an effort to win a program from which it had been essentially excluded by DARPA. Using its engineering talent, some sophisticated mathematics, and the best computing technology of the day, Lockheed’s Skunk Works rapidly created a prototype on the cheap. That prototype demonstrated what Lockheed Martin Skunk Works Senior Fellow Edward Burnett described to Ars as “our one miracle”—an aircraft shape that had a radar cross section smaller than a bird’s.

The invisible rabbit

A poster for the movie Harvey, which inspired the name of the DARPA stealth research program.[/ars_img]The story of Have Blue begins with a DARPA effort called Project Harvey—named for the invisible six-foot-three-and-a-half-inch rabbit from the play and film of the same name. The future of integrated air defense systems had already proved effective in the last years of the Vietnam War. It combined long-range radar that could detect high-flying attack aircraft from hundreds of miles away, electronic warfare sensors that could detect the ground-following radar of low-flying aircraft passively, and radar-guided surface-to-air missiles and anti-aircraft guns. And a Defense Science Board study in 1974 concluded through war-gaming out an air war with the Soviet Union in a conventional invasion scenario—specifically, the Fulda Gap scenario at the center of most Cold War military strategy at the time—that the US had to develop some technology to counter those defenses.

So in 1975, DARPA kicked off Project Harvey. The challenge would have seemed like an ideal fit for Lockheed’s Skunk Works, given that the organization had been producing “low observable” aircraft for the CIA and Air Force for years. The previous U-2 surveillance plane wasn’t technically a “stealth” aircraft, but it was coated in radar absorbent material. The same was true of the A-12 “Oxcart”/SR-71 “Blackbird” and the D-12 supersonic reconnaissance drone, which were intentionally designed to have a reduced radar cross section and painted with radar absorbing “iron ball” paint. Despite its size, the design of the SR-71 reduced its radar cross section to that of a Piper Cub, making it difficult for long-range radars to detect (at least until it was too late for someone to shoot at it).

But this was a stealth fighter project, and Lockheed had not built a fighter jet for over a decade. While Lockheed had experience with low radar cross-section aircraft, its work was so classified that the DARPA project team didn’t know about it. As such, DARPA didn’t initially invite Lockheed to the dance. General Dynamics, Fairchild, Grumman, McDonnell Douglas and Northrop were instead asked—but only McDonnell Douglas and Northrop RSVP’d for $100,000 each to craft initial entries.

Ironically, at about the same time, Denys Overholser—a Skunk Works mathematician and radar expert—discovered equations in a nine-year old research paper from Russian scientist Pyotr Ufimtsev. Recently translated by the Air Force’s Foreign Technology Division, the paper reworked some of Maxwell’s Equations to predict the radar reflectivity of a geometric shape. In his memoir, then-Skunk Works chief Ben Rich called the equations the “Rosetta Stone breakthrough for stealth technology.”

The equations were eventually used as the basis for a computer program called Echo 1, which would allow engineers to break down the design of an aircraft into a series of triangles to calculate their radar cross section for any particular angle of attack. From there, this allowed engineers to optimize the shape of an aircraft for the smallest possible radar return.

Rich, who was fighting to keep the Skunk Works afloat during a turbulent period in Lockheed’s business history, was already trying to convince DARPA to let his team join the competition. “Ben went around and made sure that the people who were in control of Project Harvey were actually briefed in on some of the things that had been done before,” Burnett said. “That really helped to get DARPA to say, ‘We’ll let you compete on your own dime.'”

That decision ended up being in Lockheed’s favor. According to Rich, DARPA actually offered to let the Skunk Works work on Harvey for a symbolic one dollar payment. Lockheed refused it—and as a result, all the work Lockheed did would remain proprietary to the company. (Accordingly, in 1993, Lockheed was ultimately granted a patent for the Have Blue concept.)

Overholser had already suggested a “faceted” design to reduce radar signature for the initial design submission for the Harvey project, but Echo 1 showed that there were issues with the first attempt because of diffraction. Using the software, the design team was able to sort through the 20 design candidates quickly to find the one with the most optimized radar cross section.

The diamond-like look of the design was largely dictated by the limits of the computing hardware of the day. “Some of the mathematics were being done on slide rules still, and a PDP-8 and other like computers, so yeah, computer limitations really kept the shaping down,” Burnett told Ars. “We were just really beginning to understand the mathematics of the physics that govern this technology.”

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2ADZ5MZ
via IFTTT

Older Adults’ Forgetfulness Tied To Faulty Brain Rhythms In Sleep

As people age they may forget more because their brain waves get out of sync, new research finds.

PhotoAlto/Frederic Cirou/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

PhotoAlto/Frederic Cirou/Getty Images

As people age they may forget more because their brain waves get out of sync, new research finds.

PhotoAlto/Frederic Cirou/Getty Images

Older brains may forget more because they lose their rhythm at night.

During deep sleep, older people have less coordination between two brain waves that are important to saving new memories, a team reports in the journal Neuron.

“It’s like a drummer that’s perhaps just one beat off the rhythm,” says Matt Walker, one of the paper’s authors and a professor of neuroscience and psychology at the University of California, Berkeley. “The aging brain just doesn’t seem to be able to synchronize its brain waves effectively.”

The finding appears to answer a long-standing question about how aging can affect memory even in people who do not have Alzheimer’s or some other brain disease.

“This is the first paper that actually found a cellular mechanism that might be affected during aging and therefore be responsible for a lack of memory consolidation during sleep,” says Julie Seibt, a lecturer in sleep and plasticity at the University of Surrey in the U.K. Seibt was not involved in the new study.

To confirm the finding, though, researchers will have to show that it’s possible to cause memory problems in a young brain by disrupting these rhythms, Seibt says.

The study was the result of an effort to understand how the sleeping brain turns short-term memories into memories that can last a lifetime, says Walker, the author of the book Why We Sleep. “What is it about sleep that seems to perform this elegant trick of cementing new facts into the neural architecture of the brain?”

To find out, Walker and a team of scientists had 20 young adults learn 120 pairs of words. “Then we put electrodes on their head and we had them sleep,” he says.

The electrodes let researchers monitor the electrical waves produced by the brain during deep sleep. They focused on the interaction between slow waves, which occur every second or so, and faster waves called sleep spindles, which occur more than 12 times a second.

The next morning the volunteers took a test to see how many word pairs they could still remember. And it turned out their performance was determined by how well their slow waves and spindles had synchronized during deep sleep.

“When those two brain waves were perfectly coinciding, that’s when you seem to get this fantastic transfer of memory within the brain from short term vulnerable storage sites to these more permanent, safe, long-term storage sites,” Walker says.

Next, the team repeated the experiment with 32 people in their 60s and 70s. Their brain waves were less synchronized during deep sleep. They also remembered fewer word pairs the next morning.

And, just like with young people, performance on the memory test was determined by how well their brain waves kept the beat, says Randolph Helfrich, an author of the new study and a postdoctoral fellow at UC Berkeley.

“If you’re like 50 milliseconds too early, 50 milliseconds too late, then the storing mechanism actually doesn’t work.” Helfrich says.

The team also found a likely reason for the lack of coordination associated with aging: atrophy of an area of the brain involved in producing deep sleep. People with more atrophy had less rhythm in the brain, Walker says.

That’s discouraging because atrophy in this area of the brain is a normal consequence of aging, Walker says, and can be much worse in people with Alzheimer’s.

But the study also suggests that it’s possible to improve an impaired memory by re-synchronizing brain rhythms during sleep.

One way to do this would be by applying electrical or magnetic pulses through the scalp. “The idea is to boost those brain waves and bring them back together,” Helfrich says.

Walker already has plans to test this approach to synchronizing brain waves.

“What we’re going to try and do is act like a metronome and in doing so see if we can actually salvage aspects of learning and memory in older adults and those with dementia,” he says.

from NPR Topics: News http://ift.tt/2oGJ5bA
via IFTTT

This electric SUV is a lot cheaper than Tesla’s

Competition is heating up for Tesla in the world’s biggest market for electric cars.

Shanghai-based startup NIO is the latest Chinese company to try to get in on the action. It unveiled a 7-seater electric SUV at a glitzy launch event in Beijing over the weekend.

Starting at 448,000 yuan (about $68,000), the NIO ES8 is nearly 50% cheaper than Tesla’s Model X, which sells for 836,000 yuan (about $127,000) in China.

NIO is also offering some Tesla-esque features and perks, including an in-car artificial intelligence system and a charging portal that it says will let drivers change their car batteries in just three minutes.

nio exterior side

NIO President Lihong Qin told CNN his company plans to “target the middle class in the big cities in China,” predicting that market will double in size in the next four to six years.

China is already a major market for Tesla (TSLA). It reported revenues of more than $1.5 billion from the country in the first nine months of this year, up from just $570 million in the same period a year earlier.

Related: Tesla could face an uphill slog in China

Qin insists that NIO isn’t planning to go head-to-head with Elon Musk’s company.

“Of course, we can compete against Tesla, technologically and product-wise,” he said.

But “there is no winner-take-all rule in this industry,” Qin added. “If we can be ourselves and we do what we think is right, we will have our market share. We don’t need to care about the competition too much.”

NIO is a 3-year-old startup that now employs more than 4,000 employees across China, Europe and the U.S. It has some deep-pocketed investors, including Chinese tech giants Tencent and Baidu and U.S. venture capital firm Sequoia Capital.

The company is working on expanding its charging network across the country, with a goal of 1,100 stations by 2020.

Building that infrastructure “will be a big challenge in China,” Qin said. And the high population density in larger Chinese cities means people can’t install charging facilities in their own garages, he explained.

Related: VW has a $12 billion plan for electric cars in China

The company is proposing ways to try to make it easier for its customers keep their cars charged, including a monthly subscription plan to rent batteries, and vans that function as mobile charging stations.

These so-called “Power Mobile” vehicles will give NIO cars enough electricity to drive 100 kilometers from just a 10-minute charge. It wants to have 1,200 of the vans on the roads by 2020.

Nio power mobile

The company also wants to eventually expand sales beyond China, including to the U.S. It already has offices around the globe, including in California, London and Munich.

But in China, it’s entering an already crowded market for electric cars.

The country is already home to companies that have been focused on electric vehicles for years such as BYD (BYDDF), which is backed by Warren Buffett.

Related: China is winning electric cars ‘arms race’

Meanwhile, many of China’s top traditional carmakers are pouring resources into the technology, and a flurry of international auto giants have announced plans recently to make electric vehicles in China.

The industry in China has long benefited from significant government subsidies that aim to cut down on pollution. NIO pointed out on Saturday that the base price for its new SUV was listed “before subsidies.”

Other features it hopes will attract consumers include a deal with Chinese e-commerce company JD.com, which will allow goods ordered online by an NIO driver to be dropped directly into the car’s trunk by a delivery worker using a one-time code.

— Steven Jiang contributed reporting.

from Business and financial news – CNNMoney.com http://ift.tt/2B7Js4G
via IFTTT

France will ban cell phones in elementary schools

Starting September 2018, students under age 15 will not be allowed to use their phones at any point during the school day.

France’s education minister has announced a mobile phone ban, taking effect in September 2018. The ban will apply to all primary, junior, and middle school students, up to the age of 15, and means that students will not be allowed to use their phones during breaks, lunch, or recess, in addition to class time, where they’re already banned.

The minister, Jean-Michel Blanquer, is calling it a “matter of public health.” He’s quoted in the Local, an English-language newspaper in France:

“These days the children don’t play at break time anymore, they are just all in front of their smartphones and from an educational point of view that’s a problem.”

Reactions have been negative, for the most part. Teachers are concerned about how such a ban would be implemented. While Blanquer’s ministry is working on figuring out those details, he has suggested stashing phones in lockers at the start of the day, which is what he and his colleagues do before cabinet meetings; but as Philippe Vincent, head of the French headteachers’ union points out in The Guardian, schools have little room for locker installations:

“Are we going to transform a school into a giant locker? I’ve done a little calculation myself: 5,300 state schools with an average 500 pupils each, that makes around 3 million lockers.”

Parents worry about not being able to get in touch with children, and say that leaving phones at home is not an option, since they want contact during the trip to and from school.

While Vincent does have a point, I think Blanquer deserves praise for his decision. There is no reason for children and young teens to be handling mobile phones at any point throughout the school day. They’re surrounded by peers, teachers, and classroom-based technology. Personal phones do not contribute meaningfully to the school environment; if anything, they detract from it by fuelling social media-based dramas and cyberbullying, and distracting students from lessons. From Quartz:

“According to a 2015 working paper published by the London School of Economics, schools that banned mobile phones saw test scores for their 16-year-olds improve by 6.4%, or the equivalent of adding five days to the school year. ‘We found that not only did student achievement improve, but also that low-achieving and low-income students gained the most,’ economists Philippe Beland and Richard Murphy told the BBC.”

This makes me think of an interview I heard on CBC Radio last month between Michael Enright and Clive Thompson, a Canadian technology journalist. Thompson said that his biggest concern isn’t even the screens themselves but what gets left out of kids’ lives when they spend so much time on them. It’s the loss of all those things they’re not doing that is most tragic.

Blanquer’s ban addresses this point. I don’t think anyone should view the ban as an attack on mobile phones, but rather as a realigning of priorities to ensure that young students spend time interacting with each other, learning how to converse and resolve difference face-to-face, and even getting used to the idea of being bored and alone with oneself. I believe such a ban will result in smarter, more resilient and communicative young adults.

from TreeHugger http://ift.tt/2yhWeHh
via IFTTT