New Kindle Oasis doesn’t work well with water

It’s 1 p.m. in the middle of a work day and I am taking a bath.

I’m testing the new $250 Kindle Oasis, the high-end e-reader from Amazon. After 10 years, the company has finally made a waterproof Kindle presumably so you can read at the beach, during a water-balloon fight, or in a tub.

Everything is going great. The wedge-shaped Oasis is lightweight and fits snugly in one hand. Once I get past the busy home screen and plunge into a book, the text looks amazing. The screen is matte with subtle backlighting that feels like a relief after staring at computer and smartphone screens for hours.

It seemed like the perfect reading device for the bath. Then I made the mistake of getting it wet.

Amazon Oasis waterproof

Water, it turns out, triggers the Oasis touchscreen. One small splash can turn the page, change the font size, exit the book or do anything else a rogue hand might. In my tests, it didn’t take more than one fat droplet to activate the 7-inch touchscreen.

The Oasis can be submerged in two meters of fresh water for up to an hour and not break, according to specifications. But if you had dreams of reading underwater, cancel them. When I dunk the Oasis the screen gets hopelessly confused, the font goes up and down, and I lose my place.

Sensitivity to water is not an uncommon issue for capacitive touchscreens like the Kindle’s. They work by sensing electrical charges from fingers and hands. Like our fingers, water can also conduct electricity. That makes the Kindle Oasis almost unusable in wet environments.

Related: Kindle’s new app still won’t let you buy books on an iPhone

Newer smartphones have engineered their screens not to react to water. Waterproof phones from Samsung and Apple might actually be a better fit for bathing than the Kindle Oasis. (Never use devices in a bath while they are plugged in.)

Amazon says the devices were “thoroughly tested” for water sensitivity.

“While a large amount of water on the screen may trigger the display, most customers will not encounter issues when reading near water. On the off chance the display is triggered, simply wipe the water off and continue reading,” said an Amazon (AMZN, Tech30) spokesperson.

E-readers may have already peaked in popularity. E-book sales dropped 15.6% in 2016, according to the Association of American Publishers.

Waterproofing seemed like the one thing that could actually make the $250 Kindle Oasis worth the steep price. It’s by far the most expensive Kindle, and it’s hard to justify the cost when Amazon still makes the excellent $120 Paperwhite.

The Oasis does add support for audio books over Bluetooth connected headphones or speakers. Maybe you’re best off listening to a book in the tub.

from Business and financial news – CNNMoney.com http://ift.tt/2A3y4SX
via IFTTT

Tesla Model S shooting brake being built by Dutch customizer

If you think the

Model S

has two too many doors and not nearly enough cargo space, and you also have a Model X-load worth of cash to burn, RemetzCar is the customizer you should direct your ducats towards. As far as we can tell, they’re the only company around to have built a hearse from a Model S (seen above), so they have a proven track record of chopping up the platform and reassembling it. (A bit of advice: You may want to examine that vehicle before committing to having your Model S permanently altered.) Here’s a teaser image:

remetzcar tesla model s

RemetzCar is ambitiously planning to build 20 units, the first of which is in production thanks to a commission from a Dutch shooting brake collector and

EV

enthusiast, says the company. They intend to unveil it in March, and it’ll likely have a custom interior considering what the company usually does when converting a vehicle. From what we can tell, RemetzCar mainly builds limos, and they look decent enough. Moreover, they have a broad range of donor vehicles – we saw everything from a stretched

Fiat 500

to several

Mercedes-Benz

wagon-limos.

The process seems to start with an angle grinder and end with a lot of welding. You can see how they built the hearse below; it’s a safe bet the process for the shooting brake will be very similar.

Related Video:

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/2hoMuFz
via IFTTT

Google ditched autopilot feature after test user napped behind wheel

By Paresh Dave

ATWATER, Calif. — Alphabet Inc’s self-driving car unit stopped developing semi-autonomous features that required drivers to take control in dangerous situations, its chief executive said Monday, as autopilot reliance left users prone to distractions and ill-prepared to maneuver.

The decision to focus on full autonomy followed experiments of lower-level driver-assist technology in Silicon Valley that showed test users napping, putting on makeup and fiddling with their phones as the vehicles traveled up to 56 mph.

John Krafcik, the head of Waymo, which was formed in 2009 as a project within Alphabet’s Google unit, told reporters that about five years ago the company envisioned technology that could autonomously drive cars on highways as a quick way to get on the market.

Automakers include similar autopilot features for highway-driving in vehicles, but they require drivers to take over the steering wheel in tricky situations. Waymo had planned to do the same.

But, “What we found was pretty scary,” Krafcik said on Monday during a media tour of a Waymo testing facility. “It’s hard to take over because they (drivers) have lost contextual awareness.”

Krafcik said the company determined a system that asked drivers to jump in at the sound of an alert was unsafe after seeing videos from inside self-driving cars during tests.

The filmed tests were conducted in 2013, with Google employees behind the wheel. The videos had not been publicly shown until Monday’s event, Waymo spokeswoman Lauren Barriere said.

The company decided to focus solely on technology that didn’t require human intervention a couple of days after the napping incident, said Krafcik, who joined as CEO in 2015. It has also since argued against allowing “handoffs” between automated driving systems and people.

“Our technology takes care of all of the driving, allowing passengers to stay passengers,” the company said in a report this month.

The two drive controls provided to passengers in Waymo’s Chrysler Pacifica minivans are buttons for starting a ride and asking the vehicles to pull over at their next chance.

Waymo is running a ride-hailing pilot program around Phoenix, Arizona that chauffeurs an undisclosed, but growing number of users in self-driving cars. The service area is limited to well-mapped roads on which Waymo has extensively tested.

Krafcik declined to specify when the company would expand beyond the small experiment, saying only that such a moment is getting “close.”

He reiterated that the company is simultaneously also identifying ways to launch self-driving trucks, municipal transit services and partnerships with carmakers.

“We see four potential applications, whether it’s Waymo branded or not,” he said.

Reporting by Paresh Dave

Related Video:

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/2xEjno3
via IFTTT

Taking a truly driverless ride in Waymo’s Chrysler Pacifica

Today was a first for me: I drove in a fully autonomous vehicle on roads without anyone behind the wheel. They weren’t public roads, but they did have intersections, other vehicles, pedestrian traffic, cyclists and more, and the car managed a fairly long route without any human intervention — and without any cause for concern on my part.

I’ve done a lot of self-driving vehicle demos, including in Waymo’s own previous-generation Lexus test vehicles, so I wasn’t apprehensive about being ferried around in Waymo’s Chrysler Pacifica minivan to begin with. But the experience still took me by surprise, in terms of just how freeing it was once it became apparent that the car was handling things all on its own, and would continue to do so safely regardless of what else was going on around it.

Waymo’s test track at Castle (more on that facility here) included multiple intersections with traffic lights, a roundabout, cars stopped on the shoulder, crossing foot band cycle traffic and more. Even if these were staged, they’d be hard to replicate in exact detail every time, so despite the fact that Waymo clearly had more control here than they would out in the real world, the driving experience was still impressive.

In particular, one event stuck with me: A squirrel (or other small rodent, I’m no expert on the fauna of Northern California) darted out quickly in front of the car, before turning back off the road – but the vehicle perceptibly slowed in case it needed to avoid it. Barring an incredibly lifelike animatronic, this isn’t something Waymo could’ve planned for.

Regarding how it actually works, once in the vehicle and buckled up, a rider taps a button to start the ride, and then displays mounted on the backs of the front seats show a visualization of what the car’s sensors see, but selectively simplified and redesigned to draw focus to things that riders find important, and to reassure them about the system’s competence and ability to spot all the key variables on the road.

This is essentially the same car driving riders around Chandler, in Phoenix, where the current Waymo pilot is operating. It’s still essentially a stock Pacifica van, with a premium trim upgrade, but included features in that vehicle, including the many USB ports for charging located throughout, the dual screens mentioned above on the seat backs, and the rear cabin AC and climate controls all make it particularly well suited to the task of putting the rider first.

I also noticed that the Pacifica drove in a manner which itself made me feel more comfortable as a rider, essentially by making it familiar. It edged into intersections cautiously, moved forward slowly when it had the right of way but its path was obstructed by a pedestrian crossing the street, and did a number of other things that made its driving feel more “human” than you might expect from an exacting computer system.

Waymo’s self-driving car ride won’t be my last, and it certainly wasn’t my first – but it was the first that suggested we might be closer than many think to Level 4 autonomous vehicles operating on public roads for a public customer base. When asked directly for a timeline on a public service launch, Waymo CEO John Krafcik declined to even claim a specific year, but he did say it’s probably going to happen sooner than many would believe.

Written by Darrell Etherington for TechCrunch.

Related Video:

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/2ygSo6q
via IFTTT