From Ars Technica: iPhone users hold AT&T accountable for perpetuating smartphone theft


Three plaintiffs filed a class-action lawsuit against AT&T in California Superior Court this week, alleging that the company acted as an accessory to theft by re-activating their stolen iPhones for the new, illegitimate owners. The suit comes as the telecom company is making moves to address smartphone theft—earlier this week, the AT&T as well as Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint announced a plan to create a national database of lost or stolen phones so that thieves could not reactivate pilfered devices.

Still, the plaintiffs think they have a case, as AT&T and other telecom companies have registered and assigned names of legitimate users to legally purchased smartphones for years, but still neglect to check with the original user when reassigning registration of the phone. And, telecom companies operate with the knowledge that users will simply buy or replace smartphones in the event of theft.

The complaint accused AT&T and any other “Doe Corporation Entities” that were “in some way legally or proximately responsible” of negligence, civil conspiracy, accessory to theft, and fraud and breach of contract, among other charges. “Plaintiffs have been told by AT&T representatives that they will not, and ‘cannot’ block and effectively kill usage of stolen cell phones by thieves and criminal organizations, however, such representations are false an fraudulent,” the suit read(PDF).

Other countries like Germany and Australia keep databases that prevent reactivation of stolen phones, which has lowered incidences of theft. In the US, electronics have recently begun to surpass cash as the most frequently stolen form of property.

 

 

from Ars Technica

From Engadget: Japanese watchdog agency wants to fine Olympus $2.5 million

Japanese watchdog wants to fine Olympus $2.5 million

Wondering how this whole Olympus accounting scandal is gonna wrap up? Well, it might simply come to a close with a 200 million yen (about $2.5 million) fine. That’s the seemingly tiny amount the Japanese SESC (Securities Exchange and Surveillance Commission) is recommending the company be fined. Ultimately the FSA (Financial Services Agency) will decide how large of a monetary punishment is appropriate for the $1.7 billion scandal. And, don’t forget, there’s still the drama of Olympus suing its own presidentand other executives to look forward to.

 

from Engadget

From The UberReview: Man Nearly Becomes PSA for Dangers of Texting and Walking… Around Bears


By now most of us have at least heard that walking and texting can be a dangerous pastime – I mean there are all sorts of things that could go wrong: you could walk into a pole, step in front of a moving vehicle, or as this man proves – wander into the path of a confused bear. Fortunately nobody was hurt and while I am not certain that turning around and running as fast as you can is what you are supposed to do in these situations, it worked for him – so the young man will live to text and walk another day.

Click here to view the embedded video.

–Thanks Michael

from The UberReview

From Ars Technica: DoJ files antitrust suit against Apple, publishers over e-book prices


The US Department of Justice has filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple and six e-book publishers over alleged collusion to fix e-book prices. The antitrust suit was filed in US District Court in New York on Wednesday morning against Apple, Hachette, Harper Collins, Macmillan, Penguin, Pearson, and Simon & Schuster, according to Bloomberg.

The European Commission began investigating Apple and the book publishers in December for allegedly trying to fix the prices of e-books in an attempt to cripple Amazon’s then-popular $9.99 e-book model. The EU was quickly followed by the US, and in late March, the EU and the US DoJ announced they were working together to pursue the case.

Read the rest of this article...

 

from Ars Technica

From Droid Life: Starting April 22 Verizon Will Charge $30 Upgrade Fee When Existing Customers Buy New Phones at a Discounted Rate

Boo!!!!  Less and less incentives to stay with Verizon…

=========================================

Well, we got rid of that ridiculous $2 monthly fee that Verizon wanted to charge you for paying your bill online, but they have decided to kick off an “upgrade fee” in its place. Starting April 22, you will have to pay a $30 “upgrade fee” when purchasing a new phone at a discounted rate on contract. So when you pay $199 for that shiny new white DROID RAZR, but lock in for 2 years, you will also pay an additional $30.

Here is the reasoning behind this move:

On April 22, Verizon Wireless is implementing a $30 upgrade fee for existing customers purchasing new mobile equipment at a discounted price with a two-year contract. This fee will help us continue to provide customers with the level of service and support they have come to expect which includes Wireless Workshops, online educational tools, and consultations with experts who provide advice and guidance on devices that are more sophisticated than ever.

From what we can tell, Sprint and AT&T each charge $36 as an upgrade fee to their customers.

Via:  Verizon

from Droid Life