6 Potential Brain Benefits Of Bilingual Education

Part of our ongoing series exploring how the U.S. can educate the nearly 5 million students who are learning English.

Brains, brains, brains. One thing we’ve learned at NPR Ed is that people are fascinated by brain research. And yet it can be hard to point to places where our education system is really making use of the latest neuroscience findings.

But there is one happy nexus where research is meeting practice: Bilingual education. “In the last 20 years or so, there’s been a virtual explosion of research on bilingualism,” says Judith Kroll, a professor at the University of California, Riverside.

Again and again, researchers have found, “bilingualism is an experience that shapes our brain for a lifetime,” in the words of Gigi Luk, an associate professor at Harvard’s Graduate School of Education.

At the same time, one of the hottest trends in public schooling is what’s often called dual-language or two-way immersion programs.

Traditional programs for English-Language Learners, or ELLs, focus on assimilating students into English as quickly as possible. Dual-language classrooms, by contrast, provide instruction across subjects to both English natives and English learners, in both English and in a target language.

The goal is functional bilingualism and biliteracy for all students by middle school.

New York City, North Carolina, Delaware, Utah, Oregon and Washington State are among the places expanding dual-language classrooms.

The trend flies in the face of some of the culture wars of two decades ago, when advocates insisted on “English first” education. Most famously, California passed Proposition 227 in 1998. It was intended to sharply reduce the amount of time that English-language learners spent in bilingual settings.

Proposition 58, passed by California voters on Nov. 8, largely reversed that decision, paving the way for a huge expansion of bilingual education in the state that has the largest population of English-language learners.

Some of the insistence on English-first was founded in research produced decades ago, in which bilingual students underperformed monolingual English speakers and had lower IQ scores.

Today’s scholars, like Ellen Bialystok at York University in Toronto, now say that research was “deeply flawed.”

“Earlier research looked at socially disadvantaged groups,” agrees Antonella Sorace at the University of Edinburgh, in Scotland. “This has been completely contradicted by recent research” that compares more similar groups to each other.

So what does recent research say about the potential benefits of bilingual education? NPR Ed called up seven researchers in three countries — Sorace, Bialystok, Luk, Kroll, Jennifer Steele, and the team of Wayne Thomas and Virginia Collier — to find out.

Attention

It turns out that, in many ways, the real trick to speaking two languages consists in managing not to speak one of those languages at a given moment — which is fundamentally a feat of paying attention.

Saying “Goodbye” to mom and then “Guten tag” to your teacher, or managing to ask for a crayola roja instead of a red crayon, requires skills called “inhibition” and “task switching.” These skills are subsets of an ability called executive function.

People who speak two languages often outperform monolinguals on general measures of executive function. “[Bilinguals] can pay focused attention without being distracted and also improve in the ability to switch from one task to another,” says Sorace.

Do these same advantages accrue to a child who begins learning a second language in kindergarten instead of as a baby? We don’t yet know. Patterns of language learning and language use are complex. But Gigi Luk at Harvard cites at least one brain-imaging study on adolescents that shows similar changes in brain structure when compared with those who are bilingual from birth, even when they didn’t begin practicing a second language in earnest before late childhood.

Empathy

Young children being raised bilingual have to follow social cues to figure out which language to use with which person and in what setting. As a result, says Sorace, bilingual children as young as age 3 have demonstrated a head start on tests of perspective-taking and theory of mind — both of which are fundamental social and emotional skills.

Reading (English)

About 10 percent of students in the Portland, Ore., public schools are assigned by lottery to dual-language classrooms that offer instruction in Spanish, Japanese or Mandarin, alongside English.

Jennifer Steele at American University conducted a four-year, randomized trial and found that these dual-language students outperformed their peers in English-reading skills by a full school year’s worth of learning by the end of middle school.

Such a large effect in a study this size is unusual, and Steele is currently conducting a flurry of follow-up studies to tease out the causality: Is this about a special program that attracted families who were more engaged? Or about the dual-language instruction itself?

“If it’s just about moving the kids around,” Steele says, “that’s not as exciting as if it’s a way of teaching that makes you smarter.”

Steele suspects the latter. Because the effects are found in reading, not in math or science where there were few differences, she suggests that learning two languages makes students more aware of how language works in general, aka “metalinguistic awareness.”

The research of Gigi Luk at Harvard offers a slightly different explanation. She has recently done a small study looking at a group of 100 fourth-graders in Massachusetts who had similar reading scores on a standard test, but very different language experiences.

Some were foreign-language dominant and others were English natives. Here’s what’s interesting. The students who were dominant in a foreign language weren’t yet comfortably bilingual; they were just starting to learn English. Therefore, by definition, they had much weaker English vocabularies than the native speakers.

Yet they were just as good at decoding a text.

“This is very surprising,” Luk says. “You would expect the reading comprehension performance to mirror vocabulary — it’s a cornerstone of comprehension.”

How did the foreign-language dominant speakers manage this feat? Well, Luk found, they also scored higher on tests of executive functioning. So, even though they didn’t have huge mental dictionaries to draw on, they may have been great puzzle-solvers, taking into account higher-level concepts such as whether a single sentence made sense within an overall story line.

They got to the same results as the monolinguals, by a different path.

School performance and engagement.

Wayne Thomas and Virginia Collier, a husband and wife team of professors emeritus at George Mason University in Virginia, have spent the last 30 years collecting evidence on the benefits of bilingual education.

“Wayne came to our research with skepticism, thinking students ought to get instruction all day in English,” says Virginia Collier. “Eight million student records later, we’re convinced,” Wayne Thomas chimes in.

In studies covering six states and 37 districts, they have found that, compared with students in English-only classrooms or in one-way immersion, dual-language students have somewhat higher test scores and also seem to be happier in school. Attendance is better, behavioral problems fewer, parent involvement higher.

Diversity and integration.

American public school classrooms as a whole are becoming more segregated by race and class. Dual-language programs can be an exception. Because they are composed of native English speakers deliberately placed together with recent immigrants, they tend to be more ethnically and socioeconomically balanced. And there is some evidence that this helps kids of all backgrounds gain comfort with diversity and different cultures.

Several of the researchers I talked with also pointed out that, in bilingual education, non-English-dominant students and their families tend to feel that their home language is heard and valued, compared with a classroom where the home language is left at the door in favor of English.

This can improve students’ sense of belonging and increase parent involvement in their children’s education, including behaviors like reading to children.

“Many parents fear their language is an obstacle, a problem, and if they abandon it their child will integrate better,” says Antonella Sorace of the University of Edinburgh. “We tell them they’re not doing their child a favor by giving up their language.”

Protection against cognitive decline and dementia.

File this away as a very, very long-range payoff. Researchers have found that actively using two languages seems to have a protective effect against age-related dementia — perhaps relating to the changes in brain structure we talked about earlier.

Specifically, among patients with Alzheimer’s in a Canadian study, a group of bilingual adults performed on par with a group of monolingual adults in terms of cognitive tests and daily functioning. But when researchers looked at the two groups’ brains, they found evidence of brain atrophy that was five to seven years more advanced in the bilingual group. In other words, the adults who spoke two languages were carrying on longer at a higher level despite greater degrees of damage.

The Coda, and a Caution

One theme that was striking in speaking to all these researchers was just how strongly they advocated for dual-language classrooms.

Thomas and Collier have advised many school systems on how to expand their dual-language programs, and Sorace runs “Bilingualism Matters,” an international network of researchers who promote bilingual education projects.

This type of advocacy among scientists is unusual; even more so because the “bilingual advantage hypothesis” is being challenged once again. A review of studies published last year found that cognitive advantages failed to appear in 83 percent of published studies, though in a separate meta-analysis, the sum of effects was still significantly positive.

One potential explanation offered by the researchers I spoke with is that advantages that are measurable in the very young and very old tend to fade when testing young adults at the peak of their cognitive powers.

And, they countered that no negative effects of bilingual education have been found. So, they argue that even if the advantages are small, they are still worth it.

Not to mention one obvious, outstanding fact underlined by many of these researchers: “Bilingual children can speak two languages! That’s amazing,” says Bialystok.

from NPR Topics: News http://ift.tt/2gRfjMf
via IFTTT

Nintendo Attractions Coming To Universal Studios Orlando And Hollywood

Here Miyamoto teaches us where the west coast of South America is.

Announced last year for Universal Studios Japan, Nintendo-themed areas are also in the works for Universal Studios Orlando and Hollywood as well, promising massive areas filled with things to do, eat and buy. Miyamoto seems overjoyed.

It’s a good fit, really. Nintendo’s spent decades building fantaxtic worlds for us to play it, now Universal is taking those worlds and making them slightly more real and likely much more expensive to play in. While specific plans will be released at a later date, the two companies have released a video in which older gentlemen explain how magical this is all going to be.

Expect Universal’s Nintendo dreams to come true over the next couple of years, followed by me considering visiting a park for the first time briefly before abandoning that idea and watching YouTube video of other people doing it instead.

from Kotaku http://ift.tt/2gsElxT
via IFTTT

Massive Antarctica ice sheet is cracking due to warming oceans

When a giant (225 square mile) slice of Antarctica’s Pine Island Glacier broke off in 2015, scientists wondered exactly what caused it. Well, they now have an explanation… and it’s not very reassuring. They’ve determined through satellite imagery that the break started when a rift was formed at the base of the West Antarctica Ice Sheet, almost 20 miles inland, in 2013. Most likely, warming oceans intruded the sheet at the bedrock well below sea level, triggering cracks that gradually made their way upward. In other words, Antarctic ice could be much more susceptible to breaking up than it seems on the surface, and that separation may be happening faster than researchers expected.

There’s still a lot left unanswered. The discoverers want to know just how these rifts get started, and determine their overall effect on the stability of ice shelves. That will require data collected from the air and on the ground, not just in space. And that may be difficult for US researchers when the incoming Trump administration appears bent on shutting down "politicized science" — that is, anything which studies the causes of climate change. The US and UK are already teaming up on field research in the area, however, so they’ll likely have more info regardless of long-term American science funding.

If the glacier break is a sign of things to come, it reinforces predictions that humanity is in for a rough ride as the Earth warms up. Scientists believe that the entire West Antarctica Ice Sheet is likely to collapse within the next 100 years, sending a massive volume of water into the sea. That would be enough to raise the global sea level by almost 10 feet and flood coastal cities. The newly analyzed satellite data suggests that the collapse could happen sooner than later, and possibly within your lifetime.

Via: Gizmodo

Source: Ohio State University, Wiley

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2fuPAsP
via IFTTT

Netflix’s ‘White Rabbit Project’ looks like ‘Mythbusters 2.0’

White Rabbit Project isn’t an official continuation of the Mythbusters franchise, but it’s pretty darn close. The show stars former Mythbusters members Kari Byron, Tory Belleci and Grant Imahara, and it’s set to premiere on Netflix on December 9th. This time around, Byron, Belleci and Imahara aren’t just investigating strange scientific phenomena or seemingly impossible movie scenes; they’re ranking history’s weirdest inventions, heists and happenings, and seeing how science makes them possible.

In its first trailer, White Rabbit Project shows off a few familiar Mythbusters tropes, including explosions, wacky robotics, big guns and mild torture in the name of science. There’s everything from training pigeons to robot jousting, and even an attempt to eat a fancy meal with electrodes intermittently zapping the hosts’ muscles.

We first heard about White Rabbit Project in September. All episodes of the show will hit Netflix at once on December 9th.

Source: Netflix

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2ftCDj4
via IFTTT

Diamonds convert nuclear waste into clean batteries

Nuclear waste is normally a major environmental headache, but it could soon be a source of clean energy. Scientists have developed a method of turning that waste into batteries using diamond. If you encapsulate short-range radioactive material in a human-made diamond, you can generate a small electrical charge even as you completely block harmful radiation. While the team used a nickel isotope for its tests, it ultimately expects to do this using the carbon isotope you find in graphite blocks from nuclear power plants.

The batteries wouldn’t generate much power, but their longevity would be dictated by the life of the radiation itself. Researchers estimate that a carbon-based battery would generate 50 percent of its power in 5,730 years. Most likely, the batteries would be used in high-altitude drones, pacemakers, spacecraft and anywhere else replacing the battery is either very cumbersome or impossible. You could see interstellar probes that keep running long after they lose solar power, for example.

Any practical implementations are likely a long way off, and there are some conspicuous problems. Cost, for one. Diamond is expensive, so it might not be feasible to convert large amounts of nuclear waste into batteries. That’s assuming the technology works as well as intended, too. Still, it raises hope that the leftovers from nuclear reactors won’t just sit there posing a threat — they might actually do us some good.

Via: New Atlas

Source: University of Bristol

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2gAoiNG
via IFTTT

Car Insurance Pricing Is Broken, But Your Phone Could Fix It

As the commercials make clear, shopping for car insurance can be frustrating. That’s in part because that auto insurance pricing is largely a black box for consumers. While the price a consumer pays for insurance is based on a risk estimate derived from demographics, past traffic violations, and claims history, each carrier uses the data in a unique, closely guarded way to calculate a price, and the number of prices for a given risk is as large as the number of insurers. Thus, it is difficult to be sure that you have the best price, or even a decent price, and many consumers are skeptical of the fairness of the entire process.

WIRED OPINION

About

David R. Martin is the chief data scientist at Root Insurance. Previously, he was a lead research and development analyst for Progressive Insurance. He holds a PhD in Applied Mathematics from Kent State University.


But today a rapidly growing share of personal auto policies in the US are being priced based on calculations using sensor data generated by the consumer’s vehicle or smartphone. Such policies are referred to as telematics, or usage-based insurance (UBI) policies. Insurance companies can use sensor data from your driving to accurately infer annualized mileage, frequency of hard brakes, and numerous other features, and correlate this information with future losses. By using this information, insurers are able to set prices for auto insurance that correlate much more directly to their cost of providing individual policies.

How does this work? Insurers provide a dongle or smartphone app to consumers, who use the technology in their cars in exchange for a possible discount. In a world where smartphones have made the casual sharing of usage data ubiquitous, it comes as no great surprise that many consumers are comfortable sharing sensor data with their insurer for a possible discount. But numerous others, distrusting of the industry in the first place, are apprehensive about the potential use of such data, fearing its existence will asymmetrically benefit the insurer.

The benefits of UBI to an insurance company are straightforward enough—increased pricing accuracy, which improves retention of the good drivers who now get better rates because they are the cheapest to insure, and it provides more adequate rates for the most dangerous of drivers. Plus, it ultimately draws in new customers who recognize the virtues of more personalized insurance.

But as crazy as it sounds, the greatest beneficiaries of UBI are not insurance companies, but consumers—even those who don’t directly participate. UBI is improving society by increasing the overall fairness of insurance pricing, reducing reliance on crude demographics, protecting everyone from fraud, and even saving lives.

Downgrading Demographics

Some consumers feel uncomfortable with the industry’s reliance on demographics such as age, gender, marital status, and credit rating to determine rates. Moreover, many of those factors are partially or completely outside a person’s control, an angle that is often exploited by consumer advocates to label their use as unfairly discriminatory.

Thankfully, as telematics risk scores become more and more powerful, we will rely less and less on demographics to approximate risk. For example, the unusually safe 16-year-old who participates in UBI can be exonerated by the sensor, saving him or her from an unfairly steep price assigned because they were lumped in with a general demographic.

Put another way, every segment of the population contains safe drivers and unsafe drivers, in varying proportions. Before UBI, the price assigned to each segment was largely determined by the ratio of unsafe drivers to safe drivers in that segment. But now, it is possible to separate drivers based on behaviors that are fundamental to actual auto risk, and thereby price more fairly, at an extremely granular and personal level.

The use of demographics in pricing may not disappear overnight, but its influence on prices will only decrease as data scientists continue to refine their models and delve deeper into understanding human behavior as it relates to risk.

Flagging Fraud

A less obvious advantage of UBI is that it allows insurers to easily identify certain types of fraud which, gone unnoticed, quietly contribute to increased rates for honest customers.

A simple example is address fraud. Pricing for insurance can vary significantly by zip code. In order to get a lower rate, some customers will provide an incorrect garaging address, in a different city or even a different state, where prices are much cheaper. As a result, the insurance company unknowingly takes on additional, underpriced risk, and inevitably, the losses end up affecting pricing and risk approximation for customers who truly do live in the stated zip code. With GPS readings from a smartphone or dongle, it is easy to flag policies that are likely to be misrepresenting their garaging address and react appropriately.

Another example of fraud that could be detected using telematics is the undisclosed business use of a personal vehicle. Driving for Lyft, for example, is generally not covered by a personal auto policy, even when a personal vehicle is being used. Before telematics, the only countermeasure available to insurers was investigation of claims circumstances, but this approach is far from optimal. By analyzing spatial and temporal driving patterns—such as frequent trips to the airport, convention centers, or major hotels—it is possible for insurers to identify customers who might be using their personal vehicle for business use. This allows them to proactively reach out to ensure legal, adequate coverage before disaster ensues, such as an uncovered accident—a better outcome for all parties involved.

from Wired Top Stories http://ift.tt/2gCmuVS
via IFTTT

World’s Kindest Repo Man Pays Off Elderly Couple’s Buick Right Before Thanksgiving

Stanford and Patty Kipping had a hard choice to make: keep making the $95 monthly payments on their 1998 Buick, or pay for the increased costs of their prescription medicines. They couldn’t do both. So the couple, 82 and 70, were ready to lose their Buick to the bank—until one very kind repo man stepped up to save the…

Read more…

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2fksGnX
via IFTTT