After 90 Days on a Vibration Plate, My Legs Feel the Same, but My Brain Feels Amazing

https://lifehacker.com/health/how-i-feel-after-90-days-on-a-vibration-plate

We may earn a commission from links on this page.

From 1969 to 2025, the idea of vibrating your way to fitness just won’t go away. Whatever shape they take, vibration plates are a relentless wellness trend, with influencers claiming they’ll transform your body with minimal effort.

Both Lifehacker’s senior health editor Beth Skwarecki and I have previously busted those myths. While your muscles do contract during the vibrating experience, these aren’t the same type of contractions that build substantial strength or burn meaningful calories. After all, if something sounds too good to be true on social media, it probably is. But does that mean it’s completely without merit?

Given all this context, I still gave my vibration plate a shot. I wasn’t expecting to get a new set of legs, but I wanted to see what these devices actually do when used consistently in real-world conditions.

My 90-day vibration experiment

I used this $109.99 (currently $98.99) vibration plate from Merach, a popular brand on the TikTok Shop.

My approach was deliberately simple and sustainable. Every day for 90 days, I committed to 10 minutes on the vibration plate. I kept myself engaged with light squats, calf raises, or simply standing in different positions while the machine did its thing. Most evenings, I’d park myself on the plate while watching TV, listening to music, or simply zoning out at the end of a long day. It became a ritual—a small pocket of time that was entirely mine.

The beauty of this routine wasn’t in its intensity but in its consistency. Ten minutes felt manageable even on the busiest days. Sometimes I’d be actively moving, other times I’d just stand there and let the vibrations wash over me like a full-body massage. There was something oddly meditative about surrendering to the mechanical rhythm.

The unexpected brain benefits

After three months, my legs look and feel exactly the same. As expected. My strength hadn’t dramatically improved, and I wasn’t suddenly running faster or jumping higher. But the most interesting effect wasn’t physical at all.

I loved the way the vibration plate cleared my head. Maybe it was placebo, or perhaps more about the ritual than the vibrating itself, but I found this device tickled my brain in an amazing way—and I’m not alone. Scrolling through comments on vibration plate videos or Reddit threads, tons of people share this sentiment, particularly when it comes to their ADHD symptoms.

I have ADHD myself, and those 10 minutes became a reset button for my scattered thoughts. Whether I’d had a stressful day at work or felt overwhelmed by endless tasks, stepping onto that vibrating platform seemed to shake loose the mental static. My racing mind would slow down, and I’d feel a little more more centered and focused.

What the science says

Since this was all wildly anecdotal and subjective, I wanted to understand if there was any research backing this up. A small study from 2014 found promising effects of whole body vibration on attention in both healthy individuals and adults with ADHD. More research is needed, but their theories suggest that the sensory input from vibration might help regulate an overactive mind, similar to how fidget tools can help people with ADHD concentrate.

I’d love to see more research about the effects of vibration plates specifically on people with ADHD and other attention disorders. For now, all I know is that it felt like it calmed my mind in ways I hadn’t expected. The vibration plate didn’t transform my physique, but the gentle shaking sure was like a fidget spinner for my brain.

The bottom line

The wellness industry loves to oversell simple solutions, and vibration plates are no exception. Still, I sincerely enjoy my vibration plate as a recovery tool and relaxation device (rather than a fitness game-changer). It’s become part of my wind-down routine, like bedtime reading or yoga. The physical benefits might be minimal, but the mental ones are noteworthy enough for me.

If you’re considering a vibration plate, adjust your expectations accordingly. Don’t expect miraculous muscle gains or dramatic weight loss. But if you’re looking for a unique way to decompress, manage stress, or quiet a busy mind, these devices might offer unexpected value.

via Lifehacker https://ift.tt/tPaEAkU

July 22, 2025 at 01:13PM

You Don’t Want to Know Where Scientists Just Found 27 Million Tons of Plastic

https://gizmodo.com/you-dont-want-to-know-where-scientists-just-found-27-million-tons-of-plastic-2000632563

Despite the hundreds of millions of metric tons of plastic floating in our oceans—not to mention the microplastics in our saliva, blood, breast milk, and semen—researchers have been unable to account for all the plastic ever produced. A new study has just tracked down a large portion of it.

Researchers from the Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ) and Utrecht University claim to be the first to provide a real estimate of ocean-polluting nanoplastics. Their research indicates that the North Atlantic Ocean alone hosts 27 million tons of floating plastic particles less than 1 micrometer (?m) in size.

“Plastic pollution of the marine realm is widespread, with most scientific attention given to macroplastics and microplastics. By contrast, ocean nanoplastics (<1??m) remain largely unquantified, leaving gaps in our understanding of the mass budget of this plastic size class,” they explained in a study published earlier this month in the journal Nature. “Our findings suggest that nanoplastics comprise the dominant fraction of marine plastic pollution.”

To reach these conclusions, Utrecht graduate student and study co-author Sophie ten Hietbrink collected water samples from 12 locations while working aboard a research vessel traveling from the Azores to the continental shelf of Europe. She filtered the samples of anything larger than one micrometer and conducted a molecular analysis on what was left behind. The team then extrapolated its results to the entire North Atlantic Ocean.

27 million tons is “a shocking amount,” Ten Hietbrink said in a NIOZ statement. “But with this we do have an important answer to the paradox of the missing plastic.” Namely, that a large part of it is floating in our oceans, invisible to the naked eye.

Unfortunately, there are a number of ways nanoparticles can end up in the oceans. While some likely arrive via rivers, others fall out of the sky with rain or on their own as “dry deposition.” (Yes, we’ve even found plastic pollution in the sky). Nanoparticles can also form when large pieces of plastic already in the ocean are broken down by waves and/or sunlight, according to the researchers. The question now is how this pollution is impacting the world and its creatures—including us.

“It is already known that nanoplastics can penetrate deep into our bodies. They are even found in brain tissue. Now that we know they are so ubiquitous in the oceans, it’s also obvious that they penetrate the entire ecosystem; from bacteria and other microorganisms to fish and top predators like humans,” said Helge Niemann, a geochemist at NIOZ and another co-author of the study. “How that pollution affects the ecosystem needs further investigation.”

The missing plastic paradox, however, is not completely solved, because not all plastics were represented in the samples. The team didn’t find polyethylene or polypropylene, for example.

“It may well be that those were masked by other molecules in the study. We also want to know if nanoplastics are as abundant in the other oceans. It is to be feared that they do, but that remains to be proven,” Niemann added. “The nanoplastics that are there, can never be cleaned up. So an important message from this research is that we should at least prevent the further pollution of our environment with plastics.”

via Gizmodo https://gizmodo.com/

July 22, 2025 at 11:00AM

Two Cancer Drugs Show Surprising Promise in Treating Alzheimer’s

http://www.discovermagazine.com/health/two-cancer-drugs-show-surprising-promise-in-treating-alzheimers

In the U.S. alone, seven million people live with Alzheimer’s disease, yet treatment options remain limited. Although cases are expected to triple by 2050, only a handful of drugs are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), none of which can cure or reverse progression, only manage symptoms.

Motivated by this lack of options, researchers from UC San Francisco and the Gladstone Institutes explored whether already-approved drugs — albeit drugs approved to treat different conditions — might help. Interestingly, a combination of two cancer drugs stood out: Research in mice showed that this combination reduced brain degeneration and restored memory, according to findings recently published in Cell, pointing towards a potent treatment path never considered before.

Genetic Traces of Alzheimer’s

“Alzheimer’s is likely the result of numerous alterations in many genes and proteins that, together, disrupt brain health,” explained Yadong Huang, study co-senior author in a press release. “This makes it very challenging for drug development — which traditionally produces one drug for a single gene or protein that drives disease.”

To tackle this complexity, the team gathered publicly available data from three studies measuring gene expression in brain cells from deceased donors with or without Alzheimer’s. Using these datasets, they created gene expression signatures representing the disease in certain brain cells, then compared them with those in the Connectivity Map, a database cataloguing how thousands of drugs affect gene expression in human cells.

From an initial pool of 1,300 drugs, 86 showed potential to reverse the Alzheimer’s gene expression signature in one brain cell type, and 25 reversed it in several cell types, making it more potent for complex condition like Alzheimer’s. However, only 10 of these drugs had already been approved by the FDA for human use.


Read More: Alzheimer’s Disease Blood Test Could Lead to Earlier, More Effective Treatment


Cancer Drugs to Treat Alzheimer’s?

To narrow the list further, the research team checked anonymized medical records in the UC Health Data Warehouse, covering 1.4 million people over age 65, to see whether any of the promising drugs also reduced the risk of developing Alzheimer’s as a side effect.

“Thanks to all these existing data sources, we went from 1,300 drugs, to 86, to 10, to just 5,” said Yaqiao Li, lead author, in the news release. “In particular, the rich data collected by all the UC health centers pointed us straight to the most promising drugs. It’s kind of like a mock clinical trial.”

From the top five candidates, the researchers chose two cancer drugs for laboratory testing. They assumed that letrozole, commonly used to treat breast cancer, would improve neuronal health, while irinotecan, used for colon and lung cancer, would benefit glial cells.

Next Step: Clinical Trials

To test their hypothesis, the team used a mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Combining both drugs worked wonders: The treatment revoked harmful gene expression signatures in neurons and glia, reduced toxic protein clumps and brain degeneration, and restored memory.

“It’s so exciting to see the validation of the computational data in a widely used Alzheimer’s mouse model,” Huang said, anticipating moving to clinical trial to test the combination therapy in Alzheimer’s patients soon.

“We’re hopeful this can be swiftly translated into a real solution for millions of patients with Alzheimer’s,” added study co-author Marina Sirota in the press statement.

Sirota emphasized how combining computational approaches with existing medical data opens new avenues in drug discovery. “Alzheimer’s disease comes with complex changes to the brain, which has made it tough to study and treat, but our computational tools opened up the possibility of tackling the complexity directly,” she said. “We’re excited that [it] led us to a potential combination therapy for Alzheimer’s based on existing FDA-approved medications.”


Read More: Rosemary and Sage Could Lead to Better Alzheimer’s Treatment


Article Sources

Our writers at Discovermagazine.com use peer-reviewed studies and high-quality sources for our articles, and our editors review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. Review the sources used below for this article:


Having worked as a biomedical research assistant in labs across three countries, Jenny excels at translating complex scientific concepts – ranging from medical breakthroughs and pharmacological discoveries to the latest in nutrition – into engaging, accessible content. Her interests extend to topics such as human evolution, psychology, and quirky animal stories. When she’s not immersed in a popular science book, you’ll find her catching waves or cruising around Vancouver Island on her longboard.

via Discover Main Feed https://ift.tt/E7FJNjd

July 21, 2025 at 04:45PM