Samsung Galaxy S8 may be the first smartphone with Bluetooth v5.0

Samsung Galaxy S8 still will dominate the iPhone 8 in one area, the flagship smartphone, that is expected to launch during MWC 2017 in February with newest Bluetooth 5.0 standard, according to a report from SamMobile website. For now, nearly all-current flagship smartphones come with Bluetoothv4.2. The Bluetooth SIG is governing body responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of Bluetooth standards.

from DailyTech News Feed http://ift.tt/2hDPFYK
via IFTTT

Uber, defiant, says it won’t apply for an autonomous car permit in California [Updated]

On Friday afternoon, Uber held a press conference to say that it would not be applying for a permit with the California DMV to test its so-called self-driving cars, despite an order from the DMV to apply for a permit or halt its operations. Uber added that it is still pick up riders with self-driving Uber cars, despite the DMV’s demands.

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2gKIz2H
via IFTTT

Doctors Say Parenting And Pot Smoking Don’t Mix

Researchers have found marijuana metabolites in the urine of babies who were exposed to adult marijuana use.

deux/Corbis/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

deux/Corbis/Getty Images

Researchers have found marijuana metabolites in the urine of babies who were exposed to adult marijuana use.

deux/Corbis/Getty Images

With more states legalizing recreational marijuana, parents are facing the question of whether they should smoke pot around their children.

“I have never smoked and would never smoke around my child,” says one mother who lives in San Francisco. California is one of eight states that allows recreational marijuana use for adults 21 and older.

This woman uses marijuana to treat her migraines and insomnia, but she never uses it around her 5-year-old son. (She asked that her name not be used because marijuana use remains a federal offense.) “I don’t want to impact his air quality by the decisions I’m making,” she says.

This is the right decision, according to research by Dr. Karen Wilson, a pediatrician and lead author of a study showing that children absorb chemicals from secondhand marijuana smoke.

“This is the first time we’ve been able to demonstrate that there are detectable marijuana metabolites in the urine of children who’ve been exposed to marijuana,” says Wilson, who is the Debra and Leon Black division chief of general pediatrics at Mount Sinai in New York.

It’s a small study, involving 43 young children in Colorado, another state where recreational marijuana use is legal. The children, ages 1 month to 2 years, were hospitalized for bronchiolitis. Their urine samples were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which used a new and highly sensitive test that can detect very low levels of marijuana metabolites. They found 16 percent of the overall samples tested positive. And for the children whose caregivers said they had been exposed to marijuana use, 75 percent had traces of marijuana in their urine.

“There is a strong association between those who said there was someone in the home who used marijuana or a caretaker who used marijuana and the child having detectable marijuana levels,” says Wilson.

There is very little scientific evidence to show the health risks of secondhand marijuana smoke or vapor, but there are clues that it could cause problems.

Some studies have shown that even low concentrations of THC — the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana — can cause developmental problems for babies whose mothers used marijuana while pregnant. Other research shows that marijuana use in adolescence can impact the developing teenage brain and cause problems with attention, motivation and memory.

“Our hypothesis is that it is not good for kids,” Wilson says. “We strongly believe that once we do the research to document secondhand marijuana exposure that we will see there is a negative effect on children.”

And this worries doctors, especially in states where marijuana use is legal — more than half of states now have laws legalizing medical marijuana. Dr. David Beuther, a pulmonologist and associate professor of medicine at National Jewish Health in Denver, says his patients frequently ask about the safety of marijuana smoke, and their perception tends to be that it is safer than cigarette smoke. Beuther says they are wrong.

“There is no reason to believe that it is any safer than tobacco smoke exposure,” he says, pointing to studies showing marijuana smoke in rats is just as bad as tobacco smoke or even worse. Beuther suspects that secondhand marijuana smoke or vaper will put children at risk for problems like increased risk of viral infections, asthma and other respiratory illnesses. It could even increase the risk of developing chronic conditions like heart disease and stroke later in life, he speculates.

“To a degree we suffer from lack of evidence,” Beuther says. “But without the federal OK it’s difficult to study it.” As marijuana is still illegal under federal law, it makes it very difficult for laboratories to get permission to conduct randomized clinical trials with it.

So until there is more science on the health risks, Beuther says, marijuana smokers and vapers should take the same precautions around children as tobacco smokers.

“Get it out of the house and away from your baby,” Beuther says. “Not in the car, not in the home. If someone wants to smoke marijuana, they need to do it outside, far away from your baby or your child, because at this point we believe the adverse health effects are probably as bad as secondhand cigarette smoke.”

from NPR Topics: News http://ift.tt/2hhLT6A
via IFTTT

Dr. Heimlich, The Man Behind The Live-Saving Maneuver, Dies

Dr. Henry Heimlich has died in Ohio at age 96. He’s seen here in 2014, holding a copy of his memoir at his home in Cincinnati.

Al Behrman/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Al Behrman/AP

Dr. Henry Heimlich has died in Ohio at age 96. He’s seen here in 2014, holding a copy of his memoir at his home in Cincinnati.

Al Behrman/AP

He’s credited with saving the lives of people who are choking, thanks to the method he popularized in 1974. Now comes word that Dr. Henry Heimlich has died at age 96.

Heimlich died early Saturday at Christ Hospital in Cincinnati, Ohio, according to Bryan Reynolds, spokesman for Episcopal Retirement Services, which operates the retirement home where the physician lived for years.

According to Reynolds, Heimlich was experiencing complications from a massive heart attack he suffered in his home Monday.

The thoracic surgeon used his famous maneuver earlier this year to help a fellow resident at his retirement home — an 87-year-old woman who began choking during dinner.

In a statement, Heimlich’s family said they were saddened by the death of a man who’s seen by a hero by many. And they said the physician’s legacy extends beyond his famous life-saving method:

“As a young surgeon, Dad was the first American to devise and perform a total organ replacement. Later, he came up with a device that saved thousands of soldiers’ lives during the Vietnam War. The Heimlich Chest Drain Valve is still used worldwide for patients undergoing chest surgery.

“Dad was firm in his convictions and passionate for his causes. He didn’t play politics well. Instead, he was single-minded in his quest to find better ways to save lives. Dad dreamed that anything was possible in the field of medicine, even when critics said otherwise.”

from NPR Topics: News http://ift.tt/2gWH9Wl
via IFTTT

Mercedes-Benz launches Croove, a peer-to-peer carsharing service

Filed under:
,,,,,,


Think Turo, only facilitated by Mercedes-Benz.

Continue reading Mercedes-Benz launches Croove, a peer-to-peer carsharing service

Mercedes-Benz launches Croove, a peer-to-peer carsharing service originally appeared on Autoblog on Fri, 16 Dec 2016 14:17:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | 
Email this | 
Comments

from Autoblog http://ift.tt/2gJIFb4
via IFTTT

Florida court rules police can demand your phone’s passcode

A Florida man arrested for third-degree voyeurism using his iPhone 5 initially gave police verbal consent to search the smartphone, but later rescinded permission before divulging his 4-digit passcode. Even with a warrant, they couldn’t access the phone without the combination. A trial judge denied the state’s motion to force the man to give up the code, considering it equal to compelling him to testify against himself, which would violate the Fifth Amendment. But the Florida Court of Appeals’ Second District reversed that decision today, deciding that the passcode is not related to criminal photos or videos that may or may not exist on his iPhone.

Obviously, this has implications for Constitutional protections of a civilian’s data contained behind a smartphone’s multi-digit passcode. Previously, a 2014 decision by the Virginia Beach Circuit Court found that individuals can’t be compelled to give up their phone’s code, but they could be forced to unlock it with a fingerprint, should that option be available.

The distinction? A passcode requires a person to divulge actual knowledge, while a fingerprint is considered physical evidence, like a handwriting sample or DNA. This interpretation sources back to the Supreme Court’s 1988 Doe v. U.S. decision, in which it ruled that a person may be compelled to give up a key to a strongbox, say, but not a combination to a wall safe.

The three-judge Appeals Court panel in Florida disagreed with this distinction. They also found the comparison out of step with the current state of technology, such that providing the passcode would not be as similarly self-incriminating as directly giving the authorities evidential documents. Further, the police were beyond probable cause of searching suspect Aaron Stahl’s code-locked phone, as Judge Anthony Black wrote for his fellows in the court’s decision:

"Moreover, although the passcode would allow the State access to the phone, and therefore to a source of potential evidence, the State has a warrant to search the phone—the source of evidence had already been uncovered … Providing the passcode does not "betray any knowledge [Stahl] may have about the circumstances of the offenses" for which he is charged."

Black clarified what kind of foreknowledge authorities would need to possess to compel someone to divulge their phone’s passcode:

"In order for the foregone conclusion doctrine to apply, the State must show with reasonable particularity that, at the time it sought the act of production, it already knew the evidence sought existed, the evidence was in the possession of the accused, and the evidence was authentic … Although the State need not have "perfect knowledge" of the requested evidence, it "must know, and not merely infer," that the evidence exists, is under the control of defendant, and is authentic."

Via: The Daily Dot

Source: Courthouse News

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2hxSYAV
via IFTTT