NIH: Give infants peanuts at 4-6 mos to avoid dangerous allergies

In recent years, peanut allergies among kids have soared, creating life-long sensitivities that can be deadly and banishing beloved PB&Js from lunch boxes everywhere. While the cause is still unclear, health experts are confident they’ve found the solution to the plague of peanut allergies: peanuts.

Parents, pediatricians, and other healthcare providers are now firmly advised to start feeding infants peanut-laced foods to head off allergies before they develop. Based on mounting evidence, experts think there’s a “window of time in which the body is more likely to tolerate a food than react to it, and if you can educate the body during that window, you’re at much lower likelihood of developing an allergy to that food,” Matthew Greenhawt, a food allergy expert, told The New York Times.

As such, a National Institutes of Health panel of specialists, including Dr. Greenhawt, released today a new set of guidelines for tossing peanuts into that window.

The guidelines, published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (and co-published in several others), are divided into three sections, based on a child’s risk of developing a peanut allergy.

The infants in the high-risk category are those that suffer from severe eczema, an egg allergy, or both. For these little ones, the experts recommend they start trying peanut-containing foods around four to six months of age—after solid foods are introduced. This needs to be done with the consultation with a healthcare provider, and it may be necessary or prudent to have the infant go through an allergy test first, like a skin prick test or an oral food challenge, before the dietary introduction.

Infants at moderate risk of developing a peanut allergy are those with mild to moderate eczema. For these kids, experts say nutty foods should be introduced around six months.

And low-risk kids with no eczema or any other known food allergies should go about eating nuts at whatever age their parents deem appropriate, based on preferences and customs.

Experts note that giving kids this young whole peanuts or straight-up peanut butter creates a choking hazard and should always be avoided. Instead, parents should mix peanut butter into water, milk, or formula. They can also sprinkle peanut powder or stir nut paste into yogurt, apple sauce, or other easy-to-swallow foods. Experts recommend kids get around six to seven grams of peanuts, doled out over three feedings within a week. (Here are some instructions and recipes.)

The guidelines are based on several recent studies showing that early exposure reduces the risk of developing peanut allergies. This includes a landmark randomized trial from 2015 that involved more than 600 infants at high risk of developing peanut allergies.

Researchers in that study first divided the kids into two groups based on whether they showed a sensitivity to peanuts based on a skin-prick test—530 came up negative, 98 were positive. Then, they randomly assigned them to eat or avoid peanut-containing foods and followed up with them when they were five years old. Within the 530 initially non-sensitive kids, 13.7 percent of peanut-avoiding kids developed allergies by age five, but only 1.9 percent of peanut-eating kids developed them. Within the 98 initially sensitive kids, 35.3 percent of peanut-avoiding kids developed allergies by age five, while only 10.6 percent of peanut-eating kids had allergies.

That study spurred an interim guidance in August 2015 that introducing kids at risk of peanut allergies to peanuts was safe and could cut down risks.

In 2010, peanut allergies among kids hit 2.0 percent nationwide. In 1999, prevalence was at just 0.4 percent.

from Ars Technica http://ift.tt/2ifucFo
via IFTTT

Razer Reveals Their Triple Monitor Gaming Laptop Concept: Project Valerie

What do you do after you’ve launched one of the thinnest and lightest gaming laptops featuring the new NVIDIA GTX 1080 GPU? Razer found itself in this situation after announcing the long anticipated update to their large gaming laptop last year, with the launch of the Razer Blade Pro. At 7.8 lbs and 0.88 inches thick, it’s one of the most interesting gaming laptops announced last year, and our full review is coming soon. Meanwhile, Razer decided to take their Razer Blade Pro, and add two more displays to it.

Today Razer is announcing Project Valerie, which is the world’s first portable laptop with three built-in displays. To do this, they didn’t make the main display smaller either. All three displays are 17.3-inch UHD (3840×2160) IGZO panels with 100% Adobe RGB coverage. I’ll leave the discussion on why 100% Adobe RGB isn’t a great experience for another day, but with the three displays, you get a 11,520 x 2160 resolution experience with Project Valerie. Since this is going to be a struggle to drive even with the best GPU, all three displays also support G-SYNC. The displays themselves have a motorized hinge to put them into position, and they slide back and slide under the main panel when stowed. It’s an interesting feat of engineering.

Just to be clear, this is currently just a prototype, but yesterday at CES Ryan Smith was able to visit Razer and check out this project. Razer has a couple of prototypes – ranging from proof-of-concept designs to the final industrial design – and not all of them have the movable displays, but they were functioning prototypes. One of the proof-of-concept prototypes was even playing Battlefield 1 in a full 180° NVIDIA Surround View gaming setup.

Razer is building this system as a mobile workhorse, and by starting with the Razer Blade Pro, they already have a thin and light system for the amount of compute available. Final specifications are not complete yet for the dimensions and weight, but Project Valerie with its triple monitors will be in the same aluminum CNC chassis format as the other Razer laptops, with a thickness of just 1.5-inches, and a final weight between 10 and 12 pounds, which is really not much different than many other 17.3-inch gaming notebooks.

This would be excellent for an office user, where the extra display real estate would make multitasking much easier, and any of us who leverage multiple monitors regularly, like I do, can see this being an amazingly portable office machine too. One of the things I hate most about using a laptop on the road is that it only has a single display, making it difficult to get work done. Often I have to resort to crazy things like bringing multiple devices on a road trip for proper workflow, as seen below.

What I need to do now to get three displays on the road

The basis of Project Valerie is the Razer Blade Pro, with a quad-core i7 mobile CPU, NVIDIA GTX 1080, and plenty of RAM, at least for the prototypes, and this may change later. For outright gaming, the single GTX 1080 is going to struggle with this kind of resolution of course, but if and when this comes to production we’ll see what Razer can do about that. It also features the ultra-low-profile mechanical keyboard from the Pro, with per-key RGB backlighting and Chroma support.

Although this is just a concept, it’s a very interesting concept, and if properly executed it could be a very exciting machine. For the time being, it is being shown at CES as a working prototype, which means it’s possible it may be put into production. Time will tell.

Source: Razer

from AnandTech http://ift.tt/2iePMJS
via IFTTT

Can an Amazon Echo Help Solve a Murder?

It was only a matter of time. In what appears to be a milestone in the Internet of things era, police have asked Amazon for data that may have been recorded on its Echo device while a murder was taking place.

As the Information reports (paywall), a man named Victor Collins died sometime during the night of November 21, 2015 while visiting a friend from work, James Andrew Bates at his home in Bentonville, Arkansas. Collins’s body was discovered in a hot tub the next morning, and Bates was charged with first-degree murder.

Bates had several smart devices in his home, the Echo among them. The device typically sits in an idle state with its microphones listening for key words like “Alexa” before it begins recording and sending data to Amazon’s servers. But as the Information points out, it’s not unusual for the Echo to wake up by mistake and grab snippets of audio that people may not have known was being recorded.

Investigators are clearly trying to be thorough, looking for any information that will shed light on what happened that night (for one thing, Bates’s smart water meter indicates he used 140 gallons of water between 1:00 and 3:00 am that evening—the prosecution claims that shows Bates was hosing down blood after he killed Collins).

But it raises a thorny question—or rather, a series of them: What is Amazon’s responsibility here? The company has so far denied the authorities’ requests, but should that be allowed? Or should investigators trying to get to the bottom of a potential murder be entitled to the data, even though it was recorded on Bates’s Echo in the privacy of his own home?

A similar problem reared its head earlier this year when Apple dug its heels in against the FBI’s request to unlock the iPhone that belonged to Syed Farook, one of the San Bernardino shooters. As Stanford University’s Woodrow Hartzog wrote for us, it was already clear that the murky legal waters Apple and the FBI found themselves in would soon extend to Internet of things devices:

Consider assistance technologies like the Amazon Echo, which are designed to “always listen” for words like “Hello, Echo” but do not fully process, store, or transmit what they hear until they are activated. For law enforcement purposes, most of the information the devices listen to is functionally impossible to recover. Does this mean legal authorities should consider Echo a warrant-proof technology? The emergence of the Internet of things is shrinking the number of “dumb” objects by the day. The government has requested laws that mandate data retention for over 10 years. Must all technologies be built to ensure that what they hear is retained and made available for law enforcement’s inspection?

Hartzog argued that authorities shouldn’t be able to force tech companies to hold on to every bit of data a user creates. Allowing some information, like voice data, to vanish is not necessarily a bad thing.

Of course, the other side of that argument is what authorities in the Collins murder case are contending: There may very well be data on Amazon’s servers that can help bring a criminal to justice. If so, investigators should get access to it.

Apple fought the FBI to a stalemate over a dead terrorist’s iPhone, with no satisfying resolution. As predicted, the case in Arkansas has now brought the conflict into the realm of the Internet of things. The more we use such technologies, the more often these issues are going to come up—and the more complicated they will become until companies and legislators get together and agree on a clear way forward.

(Read more: The Information (paywall), “The Feds Are Wrong to Warn of ‘Warrant-Proof’ Phones,” “Amazon Working on Making Alexa Recognize Your Emotions,” “What if Apple is Wrong?”)

from Technology Review Feed – Tech Review Top Stories http://ift.tt/2iBk3Tl
via IFTTT