Job titles of the future: carbon accountant

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/25/1081566/carbon-accountant-climate-change-jobs-future/

His official title is vice president of regulated reporting solutions. But really, Billy Scherba is a carbon accountant. At Personifi, a platform for climate management, Scherba works with companies to measure, manage, and disclose their contributions to climate change.

Carbon accountants help companies understand what data matters to their carbon footprint, how to collect that data in a consistent manner, and how to use it to calculate the greenhouse-gas emissions they’re responsible for. Many times, that means working with clients to upgrade their data infrastructure so it’s easier to see what parts of their operations emit the most. 

Billy Scherba

COURTESY PHOTO

A growing field 

A relatively new occupation, carbon accounting involves collecting a wide variety of data from an organization and using consistent measurement techniques to translate that data into a carbon emissions footprint. The calculations can be based on specific organizational activities such as business flights, kilowatt-hours from a utility bill, the kinds of fuel used to transport products, or even financial data. As organizations collect and analyze more granular data, their calculations get more precise. 

Notes on methodology

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP), developed by the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, is the primary methodology used for carbon accounting and is available publicly at no cost. Other, specialized carbon accounting standards do exist, but regulators from the US Securities and Exchange Commission, the European Union, Japan, and others have incorporated the GHGP into their rulings, making it the go-to accounting method for organizations publicly disclosing their carbon emissions. 

Measure. Report. Decarbonize.

Business leaders need data they can understand that highlights where their firms are having the most significant positive and negative climate impact. “Good data should be used to drive business and societal value,” says Scherba. “As we build controls and ensure this data is reliable, we have an opportunity to use it to make better climate decisions.” 

via Technology Review Feed – Tech Review Top Stories https://ift.tt/qzYGJTb

October 25, 2023 at 04:08AM

The Tale of the Rotifer That Came Back to Life after 25,000 Years in an Icy Tomb

https://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/the-tale-of-the-rotifer-that-came-back-to-life-after-25-000-years-in-an-icy-tomb/


This podcast originally aired on August 17, 2021.

Karen Hopkin: This is Scientific American’s Science, Quickly. I’m Karen Hopkin.

What has one head, one foot and one heck of an origin story? No, it’s not a strange new superhero. It’s a microscopic worm called a rotifer that was brought back to life after spending about 25,000 years locked in the arctic permafrost. Its tale is told in the journal Current Biology. [Shmakova et al., A living bdelloid rotifer from 24,000-year-old Arctic permafrost.]

Stas Malavin: So this is a long term topic for this lab.

Hopkin: Stas Malavin of the Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Social Science in Pushchino, Russia. He and his colleagues have spent decades probing the Siberian permafrost. And they’ve managed to revive a variety of interesting organisms, from a plant seed and simple bacteria to scores of more sophisticated single-celled critters.

Malavin: We have isolated around 30 or 40 strains already of unicellular eukaryotes.

Hopkin: But for some reason, people weren’t totally wowed by resurrected amoebas.

Malavin: Yeah, they don’t respect them, definitely. Rotifer is much, much better.

Hopkin: Rotifers are better—or at least more interesting—because they’re multicellular animals, with a head and a body, that can eat, crawl around and make more rotifers. And considering they’re more or less teeny tiny worms, they’re actually cute little guys.

Malavin: No, they don’t have guys. They are all females [laughs].

Hopkin: In fact, these little ladies reproduce asexually, laying eggs that hatch into the next generation of self-propagating rotifers. So they’re easy to grow in the lab, although not as easy to gather in the lowlands of Siberia.

Malavin: So this place is relatively distant. First, we go by two or three planes. Then we go by boat or by helicopter to those places.

Hopkin: Then they drill.

Malavin: One or two or more boreholes. In older times, people used the first borehole as fridge to store consequent cores in there.

Hopkin: Nowadays portable freezers help them keep their samples chilled until they get to the lab. There, Malavin and his team cut a small piece from the center of the core to prevent potential contamination with modern microbes. Then they pop it in a nice warm petri dish.

Malavin: This is called an enrichment cultivation in microbiology. Because those organisms are attached to particles, they are contorted, folded up, and we cannot see them even with microscope. So we need to wait until they reactivate from this cryptobiosis, come out from this permafrost piece, start moving, multiplying, and so on.

Hopkin: Not every sample yields success.

Malavin: Usually we see nothing. It’s relatively rare event when something alive is isolated from this cores—which is also considered an indirect proof that it’s not a contamination. Because, you know, if it was like every sample, or maybe each second sample, will yield some live organism. Here it’s about one out of 20 or even more rare.

Hopkin: And in one sample collected in 2015, the researchers found this one little rotifer. They allowed it to reproduce and conducted some DNA analyses, which showed that although their frozen rotifer is similar to modern varieties, it’s not exactly the same.

Malavin: So we consider it a new species to science.

Hopkin: And based on radiocarbon dating of other organic materials in the permafrost sample, they consider it to be between 20,000 and 30,000 years old.

Malavin: That’s approximate. But anyway, it’s two orders of magnitude or maybe three orders of magnitude more than was known for cryptobiosis in those animals.

Hopkin: So, the previous record for frozen rotifers was a decade or so. And this guy—I mean, gal—was around when woolly mammoths walked the planet.

Now, the fact that rotifers can spring to life after a thaw is not a total surprise. Entering a state of cryptobiosis allows even modern rotifers to survive seasonal changes in their local environment and more otherworldly assaults.

Malavin: They were actually sent into space, into open space, and they survived, and so on.

Hopkin: The next step is studying how rotifers can chill for millennia and still maintain their cellular integrity.

Malavin: The main mechanism, actually, is the suspension of animation, the suspension of metabolism up to almost zero or maybe zero state. So they don’t need energy, almost don’t need energy.

Hopkin: They also produce special proteins that act as antifreeze or control the formation of ice crystals: findings that could enhance the preservation of human tissues and organs.

Malavin: That’s why we are going to study proteins that help rotifers to survive in those conditions.

Hopkin: And when they figure it out …

Malavin: Maybe we cry, “Yeaaaah! We did it!” Ha. Or something like that.

Hopkin: For Scientific American’s Science, Quickly this is Karen Hopkin.

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

via Scientific American https://ift.tt/nsXepua

October 25, 2023 at 08:04AM