FINAL FANTASY VII REMAKE – Opening Movie Released Online! [VIdeo]

https://www.geeksaresexy.net/2020/02/14/final-fantasy-vii-remake-opening-movie-released-online-video/

Watch the full FINAL FANTASY VII REMAKE Opening Movie right here ahead of the worldwide launch of the game on April 10, 2020.

The planet’s very life force is drained as Mako energy by the shadowy Shinra Electric Power Company.

In the city of Midgar, a flower merchant gazes upward as a train pulls into a station…

FINAL FANTASY VII REMAKE is a reimagining of the iconic original with unforgettable characters, a mind-blowing story, and epic battles.

The story of this first, standalone game in the FINAL FANTASY VII REMAKE project covers up to the party’s escape from Midgar, and goes deeper into the events occurring in Midgar than the original FINAL FANTASY VII.

[Final Fantasy]

The post FINAL FANTASY VII REMAKE – Opening Movie Released Online! [VIdeo] appeared first on Geeks are Sexy Technology News.

via [Geeks Are Sexy] Technology News https://ift.tt/23BIq6h

February 14, 2020 at 09:18AM

Declaring Fortnite, Roblox Virtual Currency For Tax Just Got Complicated

https://www.gamespot.com/articles/declaring-fortnite-roblox-virtual-currency-for-tax/1100-6473731/?ftag=CAD-01-10abi2f

With the April 15 tax deadline approaching for Americans, some might be wondering about what they do and do not need to disclose on their Form 1040 as it relates to gaming. The situation just got a little more complicated due to a change by the IRS.

The IRS recently removed wording from its website that said Americans needed to disclose whether or not they received, sold, exchanged, or acquired a financial interest in Fortnite or Roblox virtual currency during the 2019 tax year. Millions of Fortnite and Roblox players would presumably be impacted, as they would need to disclose this as taxable income.

The wording was discovered by Coin Center director Jerry Brito. The IRS removed the language after Bloomberg Tax followed up with the government group, though it has yet to comment officially on the matter.

A spokesperson for Epic Games told Bloomberg Tax that Fortnite’s virtual currency, V-Bucks, should not be included as a taxable interest because they cannot be exchanged for money. Roblox, however, allows players to cash out their virtual currency–Robux– for real money. A spokesperson for developer Roblox Corp. clarified that Roblox users who want to cash out must have IRS forms on file with the developer. The company also reports all payouts to the IRS.

It’s a complicated situation. While the IRS has removed Fortnite and Roblox from its wording for virtual currency taxable income, taxpayers might still be scratching their heads because the definition of “convertible virtual currencies” is still the same.

The Entertainment Software Association chimed in with its own statement that in-game currency that cannot be cashed out, as is the case in many games, and should not be treated thee same as Bitcoin and other virtual currencies that hold more real-world cash value.

“Game economies are typically closed economies where currencies cannot be cashed out or traded,” the ESA said. “Financial regulators who have considered the status of game currencies in detail have treated them distinctly different from Bitcoin and similar virtual currencies precisely because they cannot be cashed out. We think that is the appropriate approach and are hopeful that on closer consideration the IRS will correct its guidance.”

If you’re wondering what you should disclose on your taxes, you should talk to a tax professional.

Get the latest news and videos for this game daily, no spam, no fuss.

GameSpot may get a commission from retail offers.

via GameSpot’s PC Reviews https://ift.tt/2mVXxXH

February 13, 2020 at 06:17PM

Volvo Trucks VNR Electric First Drive Review | Hauling goods goes green

https://www.autoblog.com/2020/02/14/volvo-trucks-lights-electric-vnr-semi-review/

Climbing up into the big rig and settling in behind its massive steering wheel dials up childhood fantasies fueled by Hollywood. Just for a moment it’s the 1970s and we’re hauling a load of Coors from Texarkana to Atlanta. A black Trans Am running blocker. The CB crackles over the rattle of the truck’s enormous diesel. “Breaker One. Breaker One. This is the Bandit. Is the Snowman out there? Am I hittin’ ya, son?”

But there is no load of bootleg beer, no CB and no rattling diesel. This truck is powered by electricity. We’ve climbed up into the VNR Electric, the first zero emissions heavy duty freight transport from Volvo Trucks. The company, which sells its diesel trucks in 190 countries, unveiled the electric-powered rig last fall, and promises to put 23 on the roads of Southern California by the end of this year. Today there are five.

Volvo Trucks, not Volvo

Volvo is on a hard push for EVs. Owned by Geely, a Chinese company, its new spinoff Polestar, which it calls an “electric performance brand,” is now building its first EV in China. The high-performance coupe is called the Polestar 1, and more models are on the way, including the four-door Polestar 2, which will rival the Tesla Model 3, and an SUV, probably called — you guessed it — the Polestar 3.

Now Volvo Trucks is beginning to crank out its electric big rigs at its factory in New River Valley, Virginia, where they’re built alongside its diesel-powered products. But the two efforts, and the two companies — Volvo Cars and Volvo Trucks — have little to do with one another. Volvo Trucks has been completely separate from the car company of the same name since Ford acquired Volvo Cars back in 1999. It was sold to Geely in 2010.

Volvo Trucks builds heavy-duty transport trucks for long-haul and regional use, but the company, which says it employs 12,000 engineers globally and spends $2.3 billion annually on research and development, also has an expansive line of zero-emissions products that range from electrically powered forklifts to 5,000 electric buses operating around the world, mostly in Europe.

According to Brett Pope, the director of electromobility for Volvo Trucks North America, the electric trucks reduce carbon dioxide production by 40-60% during their operational life compared to the company’s diesel trucks, and the goal is the same typical 15-year duty cycle.

Volvo LIGHTS

To create and facilitate the infrastructure needed to support these trucks, from charging to the training of technicians, Volvo’s Low Impact Green Heavy Transport Solutions (LIGHTS) program was launched in 2018, with 14 partners. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is on board, along with Shell, two Southern California universities and Southern California Edison, one of the nation’s largest electric utilities.

Volvo has contributed $36.7 million to the $90 million program, while CARB has pitched in $44.8 million. It’s all managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, which regulates air pollution in the area and contributed $4 million from the Clean Fuels Fund. TEC Equipment, the largest Volvo Truck dealership in North America, has invested $800,000 in the program.

Located in the trucking hub of Fontana, California, right across the street from California Speedway, TEC’s two-year-old, 14-acre facility has become the unofficial ground zero of Volvo LIGHTS, along with the Port of Los Angeles in Long Beach, about 65 miles southeast. About 40% of all imports go through California’s ports, and nearly 20% of all containers moving through all U.S. ports come through Long Beach. Once those goods are loaded onto trucks, most pass through Fontana on their way across the U.S.  

Volvo has promised 58 public and private chargers for its trucks in the area by the end of 2020. So far there are two, both located inside the enormous service bays at TEC Equipment. They’re 50-kW units and Volvo says they charge the trucks lithium-ion batteries at a rate of 25 miles of range per hour of charging. On a 150-kW charger, the trucks refuel at a rate of 75 miles of range per hour. We’re told four will soon be installed: one outside at TEC, two at a truck stop in Anaheim and one at the port.

Replacing the turbodiesel

Volvo offers five different trucks, its VNL models are for long-haul duty, while its VNR or Volvo Normal Regional are for shorter local routes. Due to its range limitations of up to 175 miles, the electric powertrain’s availability is limited to the VNR model, and due to the lack of a charging infrastructure the trucks will stick to short hub-to-hub routes for the foreseeable future.  

Normally, these trucks are powered by Volvo’s D11 or larger 13-liter D13 inline six-cylinder diesels. Both are turbocharged with common rail fuel injection, and backed by a 12-speed automated manual transmission with a single clutch and two-pedal operation. Many versions of the engines are offered, but the most powerful D13 makes 500 horsepower at about 1,500 rpm and 1,850 pound-feet of torque at about 1,300 rpm.

The VNR Electric is offered with four or six 66-kWh battery packs. Each weighs 1,146 pounds and measures nearly six feet long, over two feet wide and almost a foot deep. Cased in aluminum structures surrounded by steel for impact safety, two are mounted on each side of the truck within the wheelbase, basically replacing the truck’s saddle style fuel tanks. The other two are located higher behind the cab. With the six battery packs aboard, there’s a total power storage capacity of 396 kWh, but Volvo limits the usable power to 300 kWh to extend battery life.

Volvo mounts the “modular power box” under the truck’s hood, housing the DC-DC voltage converters, coolant pumps, heaters, junction boxes, fuse blocks and other necessary hardware, along with a conventional radiator, right where you would expect. The heating and cooling system is continuously monitoring and manipulating the temperature of the batteries, which is ideal at 77 degrees Fahrenheit.

Between the frame rails, mounted low beneath the rear of the cab, are two electric motors that spin up to 10,000 rpm and produce over 500 horsepower. In that space is also a two-speed automatic transmission, designed by Volvo, and geared extremely low, with a 9.5:1 first gear and a 3.5:1 second. Volvo also replaces the diesel’s 2.49 rear-axle gears with a radically shorter 5.38:1 ratio, and with all that torque multiplication, the VNR Electric puts more to the ground — 23,601 pound-feet of wheel torque vs. 20,652 on the diesel.

To keep production as uncomplicated as possible, Volvo hasn’t modified the VNR’s steel chassis, air bag suspension or other components. However, all subsystems are now electric including the power steering, and higher load tires are required to handle the additional weight. The VNR Electric weighs 24,000 pounds with six battery packs on board; that’s 8,000 pounds more than the diesel truck dry. It’s also better balanced, with less weight mounted over its front tires, and its center of gravity is lower.

Disc brakes, which are optional on a conventional VNR, are lighter than the drums and use less air. They’re standard on the VNR Electric and feature adjustable regeneration with four settings. Volvo says the system can extend the truck’s range by 25%.

Let’s haul some beer

A couple of laps around the infield road course at California Speedway is all we get, and the VNR Electric is like driving the world’s tallest and heaviest Tesla. Its operation is silent, as expected, with just a slight whir from the motors under acceleration. Volvo says its cab is six decibels quieter than the diesel-powered truck.

There’s a push button shifter on the dash, but first you have to release the air pressure from the brakes. Channeling my inner Snowman, I reach up and push the big yellow button just to the right of its simple analog gauge cluster. The truck delivers the desired high-pitched whoosh.

Throttle response is immediate off the line, but the power levels off once the transmission upshifts to second between 10 and 20 mph. You don’t feel the gear change, however. There’s no reverse gear, instead Volvo reverses the spin of the electric motors. Throttle control is exceptional. The truck is easy to creep, which should make it easy to drive in tight spaces.

The dual-axle truck is equipped with six battery packs, but there’s no trailer hitched up, making it easy to maneuver the big rig through the corners. The suspension is well damped, and the steering has a stratifying heft, but it’s painfully slow, forcing you to continuously shuffle your hands on its big steering wheel.

It accelerates smoothly but with little zeal. With a rolling start it manages just 55 miles per hour down the track’s eighth-mile-long back straight. “I thought it would feel faster,” I say to the Volvo engineer sitting in the passenger seat.

“Really?” he says. “It pulls away from the diesels easily.”

On the second lap, I play with the regeneration levels of its braking system. This is manipulated with a steering column stalk, so it’s easy to change on the fly. In the two most intense settings you can basically drive with one pedal as the brakes slow the truck rapidly when you lift off the gas. The response of the system isn’t as immediate as in some electric cars, however. There’s a beat before the truck begins to slow.

“The regen system is also tied into the automated collision braking system,” says our copilot.

A diesel-powered VNR costs between $100,000 and $125,000. The VNR Electric will cost considerably more. Volvo hasn’t released pricing, but admits that convincing the trucking industry to give the new technology a chance will have its challenges. Financial hurdles aren’t just the costs of the trucks themselves, but also the price of infrastructure development. “We will need support with incentives to help adoption,” says Lars Stenqvist, chief technology officer for Volvo.

“We’re just starting in California,” adds an upbeat Pope. “We’ll move to new regions when we’re prepared and expand routes as the infrastructure improves.” In the meantime, the first VNR Electrics are on the road, and Volvo says the trucks have a payload of over 42,000 pounds and a gross combined weight of 82,000 pounds starting on an 8% grade.

How much does a trailer filled with 400 cases of Coors weigh?

Related Video:

via Autoblog https://ift.tt/1afPJWx

February 14, 2020 at 07:50AM

Activision Blizzard is Pulling All Games from GeForce Now

https://www.legitreviews.com/activision-blizzard-is-pulling-all-games-from-geforce-now_217397

NVIDIA GeForce Now users will not be happy to hear the news from Activision Blizzard. Activision Blizzard has announced that it is pulling all its games from the service at this time. That means titles like Overwatch and CoD: Modern Warfare will be leaving.

Details on the removal of the games are unavailable. All we know is that NVIDIA has stated it removed the Activision Blizzard titles at the company’s request. No additional details were offered.

NVIDIA wrote, “While unfortunate, we hope to work together with Activision Blizzard to reenable these games and more in the future.” The loss of these games could send some games who were playing those titles on GeForce Now looking for a new streaming service.

NVIDIA GeForce Now costs $5 monthly and allows gamers to stream the games they buy reports Android Central. It’s unclear what will happen for gamers who purchased the games.

via Legit Reviews Hardware Articles https://ift.tt/2Y6Fy3O

February 12, 2020 at 09:42AM

Xiaomi’s Mi 10 flagships feature 108MP cameras and 30W wireless charging

https://www.engadget.com/2020/02/13/xiaomi-mi-10-reveal/

Xiaomi has unveiled its new flagship devices, the Mi 10 and Mi 10 Pro, which feature the 30W wireless charging capability it debuted with the Mi 9 Pro 5G last year. Unlike its predecessor that has 40W wired charging, though, the Mi 10 has 30W wired charging (probably because it’s cheaper) and 10W reverse charging capabilities. It’s also the second phone series to use the brand new LPDDR5 RAM technology after Samsung’s Galaxy S20 — in fact, Xiaomi will source its RAM chips from Samsung and Micron.

The Mi 10 phones are powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865 platform and feature WiFi 6, along with Bluetooth 5 and NFC connections. They have a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate and ambient sensors on both sides, which can, say, make sure the phone doesn’t kick to full brightness when you walk under a lamp post at night.

The non-pro Mi 10’s prices begin at 3,999 yuan or about US$570. If you’re going for the cheapest configuration, you’ll get a phone with 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 128GB of UFS 3.0 storage, as well as a 4,780 mAh battery. Meanwhile, the cheapest Mi 10 Pro has 8GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 256GB UFS 3.0 storage. The model’s prices begin at 4,999 yuan (US$720). Although the Pro’s 4,500 mAh battery is smaller than its cheaper sibling, it boasts a 108 megapixel camera with 8K capture mode (a feature also found in the Galaxy S20), 10x hybrid zoom and 50x digital zoom. It also supports 5G in China.

Xiaomi

Both phones are now available for pre-order and will ship on February 18th. Aside from its new flagship devices, Xiaomi has also unveiled a few accessories for them: a cooling fan clip for US$18, a fan-cooled wireless charging stand for US$29 and a WiFi 6 router for US$86. Unfortunately, the company didn’t mention anything about the Mi Mix Alpha — its phone with a 180-percent screen-to-body ratio — which went up for pre-order in December.

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

February 13, 2020 at 08:32AM

Engineer Builds Novel Cellphone With a Rotary Dial

https://www.geeksaresexy.net/2020/02/12/engineer-builds-novel-cellphone-with-a-rotary-dial/

Engineer Builds Novel Cellphone With a Rotary Dial

Engineer Justine Haupt built this novel cellphone that uses a rotary dial instead of a touchscreen to dial numbers. She used an old classic trimline phone for the dial, and put everthing together using an Arduino board and Adafruit parts. If you’re wondering why she did it, here’s what she wrote:

Why a rotary cellphone? Because in a finicky, annoying, touchscreen world of hyperconnected people using phones they have no control over or understanding of, I wanted something that would be entirely mine, personal, and absolutely tactile, while also giving me an excuse for not texting. …So it’s not just a show-and-tell piece… My intent is to use it as my primary phone. It fits in a pocket.; It’s reasonably compact; calling the people I most often call is faster than with my old phone, and the battery lasts almost 24 hours.

[Via Laughing Squid]

via [Geeks Are Sexy] Technology News https://ift.tt/23BIq6h

February 12, 2020 at 01:05PM

Malware Threats on Macs Outpace Windows For First Time Ever

https://gizmodo.com/malware-threats-on-macs-outpace-windows-for-first-time-1841610874

It’s generally accepted that Macs are safer and less malware-prone than Windows PCs. Well, not anymore. A new report says that for the first time ever, Mac-specific threats outpaced PCs by a rate of 2:1 in 2019.

The report comes from Malwarebytes, an antivirus software maker. In its 2020 State of Malware Report, the firm says it found the volume of Mac threats increased year-over-year by more than 400 percent. While it attributes some of that number to a larger Mac userbase, the company calculated the number of threats per endpoint on both Mac OS and Windows. The results? In 2019, the company detected an average of 11 threats per Mac endpoint compared to 5.8 threats per Windows PC endpoint. Compared to 2018, Mac endpoint threats rose from 4.8 to 11.

As for the reason behind the drastic increase, Malwarebytes says it’s likely due to increased market share. As more people use Apple computers, they become more attractive to bad actors. The report also notes that macOS’s built-in security has yet to sufficiently tackle adware and potentially unwanted programs (PUPs) compared to malware.

According to the report, Mac threats also differ significantly from those faced by PCs. While Windows machines are more likely to face traditional types of malware, the most prevalent Mac threats are adware and PUPs. The latter mostly consists of “cleaning” apps like MacKeeper and MacBooster. On the adware side, NewTab topped the list. NewTab is an adware family that redirects browser searches to earn “illicit affiliate revenue” and is often spread via fake flight or package tracking pages, fake maps, and face directions. Overall, adware and PUPs are considered less dangerous than traditional malware. That said, the increased number indicates these types of threats are becoming more aggressive.

Adware is also a problem for Windows too, with roughly 24 million detections on PCs. That’s an increase of roughly 13 percent for consumers and 463 percent for businesses. Also, seven out of the top ten consumer threats were some sort of adware variant. Windows PCs were also targeted by Emotet and Trickbot, two types of Trojan botnets, as well as new ransomware including Ryuk, Sodinokibi, and Phobos.

The main takeaway is that no, your Apple computer isn’t more immune to malware and maybe you should take security more seriously. Adware freaking sucks.

via Gizmodo https://gizmodo.com

February 11, 2020 at 04:26PM