Most lidars today have between 1 and 128 lasers—this one has 11,000

https://arstechnica.com/?p=1644163

Most lidars today have between 1 and 128 lasers—this one has 11,000

Lidar sensors work by bouncing laser light off surrounding objects to produce a three-dimensional “point cloud.” The first modern three-dimensional lidar was created for the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge, a pivotal self-driving car competition. Today, many experts continue to see lidar as a key enabling technology for self-driving cars.

That original 2005 lidar, made by a company called Velodyne, contained a vertical array of 64 lasers that spun around 360 degrees. Each laser had to be carefully aligned with a corresponding detector. This complexity contributed to prices as high as $75,000. Today, high-end lidars still cost tens of thousands of dollars.

There are now dozens of startups trying to build cheaper lidar. Many of them try to reduce costs by using a single laser beam that’s scanned in a two-dimensional pattern.

But other lidar companies are taking things in the other direction: building lidars with thousands of lasers. A company called Sense is selling a lidar with 11,000 lasers for around $3,000 each. Another company called Ibeo is working on a lidar that will have more than 10,000 lasers.

To be clear, Ibeo’s new lidar isn’t out yet, so we don’t know how well it will perform. And Sense’s current lidars aren’t close to matching the performance of Velodyne’s best lidar. They have a range of 15 to 40 meters, compared to more than 200 meters for some Velodyne units.

But Sense CEO Scott Burroughs says he’s only getting started. The company is working on a new sensor with a range of 200 meters that’s due out next year. That could make it competitive with today’s high-end lidar sensors. For its part, Ibeo has deep connections to the automotive industry that could allow it to score big deals with conventional automakers.

Micro-transfer printing

Both Sense and Ibeo are using a low-cost type of laser called a vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL). VCSELs can be fabricated using conventional silicon semiconductor techniques, allowing thousands of them to be created on a single silicon wafer. We previously covered another startup, Ouster, whose lidar is based on VCSELs.

Sense’s lidar has dramatically more lasers than Ouster’s. To achieve this, Sense uses a technique called micro-transfer printing.

It’s not too hard to fabricate thousands of VCSELs on a single die. But if you shipped a chip with 11,000 tightly packed lasers, you could have a couple of problems. Having so many lasers in a tight area could create a lot of heat. And you could also have issues with eye safety. VCSELs operate at a frequency that can damage the human retina, so if someone pointed 11,000 lasers at their eyes, it could cause permanent injury.

Sense has a clever solution for these issues: spread the lasers out. After fabricating thousands of VCSELs on a traditional silicon wafer, Sense moves them onto a new heat-conducting ceramic substrate, spreading them out in the process.

Tiny rubber bumps pick up microchips using electrostatic forces.
Enlarge /

Tiny rubber bumps pick up microchips using electrostatic forces.

XCeleprint

This is where micro-transfer printing comes in. The technique uses a rubber stamp with a grid of tiny bumps on the bottom. When one of those bumps touches a tiny VCSEL chip, it can pick it up using electrostatic forces.

XCeleprint

The bumps are arranged so that one out of every n chips—in both the horizontal and vertical direction—is picked up from the original wafer and placed on the new substrate. Then for the next lidar unit, the stamp picks up another set of chips one slot over. In this way, a single silicon wafer can produce 11,000-laser assemblies for many lidar units.

Sense is aiming to boost its lidars’ range

Ouster's OS-1 (left) and OS-2 lidar sensors.
Enlarge /

Ouster’s OS-1 (left) and OS-2 lidar sensors.

Instead of scanning a scene sequentially, as many other lidar sensors do, Sense uses its 11,000 lasers to illuminate an entire scene in a single flash. The sensor then measures how long it takes the return flash to bounce back from various directions.

Flash lidars like this tend to have poor range because illuminating an entire scene means that light gets wasted in the space between pixels. Sense is essentially taking a brute-force approach to this problem, using a lot of light to illuminate the scene. Spreading out the lasers helps deal with the heat and eye safety issues that this approach would otherwise raise.

Still, Ouster CEO Angus Pacala notes that Sense’s approach has a significant downside: high power consumption. “More electrical power means bigger sensors,” he told Ars. “Bigger sensors means more cost and a more difficult integration.”

Sense’s current products deliver shorter ranges than leading lidars despite drawing more power. Sense’s lidars consume significantly more power—25 to 35 watts—than longer-range rivals like Ouster (14 to 20 watts) or Velodyne (8 to 12 watts). And the Ouster and Velodyne lidars are 360-degree spinning units; you’d need multiple fixed lidar units from Sense to get the same 360-degree coverage.

An important question is whether Sense can extend the range of its lidars without further increases in power consumption. Burroughs is aiming to release a 200-meter lidar in 2021. It will have even more than 11,000 lasers—though they exact number hasn’t been determined yet. A key challenge will be to achieve greater range without an equally dramatic increase in power consumption.

Single-photon avalanche diodes are getting trendy

Ibeo

One way Sense plans to do this is by using an array of single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) to detect reflected laser light in its next-generation lidar sensor. This is another parallel to Ouster, which uses SPADs in its own lidar. In an interview with Ars Technica in 2018, Pacala said his long-term vision was to use two-dimensional arrays of VCSEL lasers and SPAD detectors to build lidars that work a lot like cameras—which sounds a lot like the product Sense is aiming to introduce next year.

As the name suggests, SPADs are sensitive enough to detect a single photon. And like VCSELs, they can be fabricated using conventional silicon processes—allowing them to be cheap at scale. Their greater sensitivity may help Sense achieve longer range for a given amount of laser light.

Interestingly, Ibeo is also planning to use SPADs for its next-generation lidar.

Ibeo is not a startup. Some of its lidars were used in the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge, but the company’s participation tends to get overlooked because its lidars had only four scanning lines as opposed to Velodyne’s 64. Ibeo scored a major coup a few years ago when it got a contract to supply lidars to Audi—the first time lidars were installed in production cars. Ibea counts ZF, a major “tier 1” auto supplier, as a minority shareholder, which could help it score additional automotive contracts in the future.

In a Thursday interview, Ibeo operations director Mario Brumm told Ars that Ibeo’s next-generation lidar, due out later this year, would feature an 128-by-80 array of VCSELs coupled with a 128-by-80 array of SPADs. Ibeo is pursuing a modular design that will allow the company to use different optics to deliver a range of models with different capabilities—from a long-range lidar with a narrow field of view to a wide-angle lidar with shorter range. Ibeo is aiming to make these lidars cheap enough that they can be sold to automakers for mass production starting in late 2022 or early 2023.

An obvious question here is how Ibeo will deal with the heat and eye-safety issues Sense is solving with micro-transfer printing. One possibility is that by using highly sensitive SPADs, Ibeo can reduce its lasers’ power output enough to avoid power and eye safety issues. It may also help that Ibeo has a one-to-one connection between lasers and detectors, leading to fewer “wasted” photons. In our conversation, Brumm told me that low power was a priority for the company’s automotive customers.

On the other hand, it might turn out that it’s difficult to get this approach to work without Sense’s micro-transfer printing technology—and that both Ibeo and Ouster will struggle to make solid-state flash lidars without it.

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

January 16, 2020 at 12:54PM

Twitch Has Become a Haven for Live Sports Piracy

https://www.wired.com/story/twitch-sports-piracy-streaming

As Liverpool soccer player Roberto Firmino clutched out the only goal of the club’s December 21 FIFA Club World Cup match before a live audience of over 45,000, at least twice as many fans were tuned in somewhere better suited to FIFA 20, the video game: the streaming platform Twitch.

While the game roiled on, three of the top 10 livestreams listed in Twitch’s directory were simulcasts of the FIFA Club World Cup match—with 14,000, 33,000, and 53,000 viewers respectively. The usual Twitch suspects filled out the rest of the list: a couple of Fortnite streams, a Counter-Strike: Global Offensive tournament and, a little cutely, a livestream of FIFA 20. The pirated sports streams were live for hours and hours.

The parade of copyright violations wasn’t a Club World Cup anomaly. Twitch has been and remains home to illicit sports broadcasts; a late December boxing match attracted over 86,000 viewers—some of whom spammed ACII genitalia in chat—and a mid-January soccer match drew over 70,000 over three livestreams. Although Twitch often stomps them out mid-match, plenty of livestreams posted by throwaway accounts with innocuous names like “Untitled” slip through the cracks and garner tens of thousands of viewers.

Pirated live sports broadcasts have prompted hand-wringing from both government and private companies for over 15 years. At a stern 2009 hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, Texas representative Lamar Smith noted the dramatic increase in the unauthorized distribution of live sports programming. “Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free,” he asked. “Why pay the sporting event when you can watch it online for free?”

A senior vice president of Twitch’s predecessor, Justin.tv, testified back then that the company used special filtering software that matched live streams with copyrighted content and removed offending feeds. Virginia representative Bob Goodlatte contended that, compared to a platform like YouTube, the speed and simultaneity of livestreaming presents a slew of challenges when it comes to taking down, say, a pirated UFC stream before the damage is done. That was over 10 years ago.

As the value of sports media rights has climbed to over $20 billion, copyright holders have more incentive than ever to guard their treasure. Yet piracy persists, in part because it’s so burdensome for copyright holders to catch it. Stream aggregation site FirstRow Sports lays out a buffet of illicit livestreams for games ranging from ice hockey to basketball and attracts over 300,000 daily visitors, according to data from web analytics firm SimilarWeb. In January 2019 alone, sports fans accessed sports piracy sites 362.7 million times, according to data from digital piracy research firm Muso. On Discord, anonymous benefactors distribute links to soccer livestreams like handfuls of pigeon feed at the park. Once a stream is taken down, another immediately manifests. It’s like 40 games of Whac-A-Mole simultaneously taking place in 40 adjacent arcades.

Increasingly, those links lead to Twitch, whose credentials as a mainstream platform make it a relatively safe option—especially after Reddit shut down the popular soccer piracy subreddit r/soccerstreams. “The older days of streams (5+ years ago) was [sic] littered with ads and viruses,” says a soccer stream Discord moderator who goes by Tom. “even though it is considered illegal, I see it being the same as watching porn and being under 18.” He adds that some of the hairier-looking piracy sites are still more popular, offer higher-quality streams, and have live chats that utilize Twitch chats’ code.

The same subscription fatigue that’s fueled the resurgence in pirating streamed television and movies appears to have hit sports, as well. “Whenever a game isn’t on the biggest channels that I have under my subscriptions, Twitch seems to be the place to go to,” says sports reporter Luis Paez-Pumar. Paez-Pumar says he has access to NBC, Fox, ESPN and BeIN, yet once a week, he’ll catch a game of soccer on Twitch. “It’s not the ideal viewing experience, but sometimes there are no options besides subscribing to a billion premium things.”

via Wired Top Stories https://ift.tt/2uc60ci

January 15, 2020 at 02:12PM

Paris Museums Have Released More Than 150,000 Images of Artwork Into the Public Domain

https://lifehacker.com/paris-museums-have-released-more-than-150-000-images-of-1841016692

Image: Robert Bonnart, “Dame en déshabillé sur un lit de gazon” ( 17th Century), from the collection of Musée Carnavalet, Histoire de Paris, now available via Open Access.

If you’ve always dreamed of taking a trip to Paris to feast your eyes on some world-class art, you no longer need to book that plane ticket. Thanks to Paris Musées, a collection of 14 museums in Paris, there are now more than 150,000 high-resolution digital copies of works of art available online for free without restrictions. Their collections website includes works from well-known artists like Rembrandt, Monet, Picasso and Cézanne, as well as thousands of others.

And it’s not just paintings: Over at Jason Kottke’s blog, kottke.org, he notes that he was especially happy to see the works of photographer Eugène Atget, who captured life on Parisian streets, featured on the site.

Users can search for images by the museum that houses the work, the artist/creator, the time period and the dominant colors. Once an image is selected, you can download a 300 DPI image, as well as details about the work, and a guide of best practices for using and citing the sources of the image. People are seemingly so enthusiastic about this new resource that at the time of publication, the site was pretty slow and crashed a few times before we were able to download an image. We’ll chalk that up to growing pains and be back to browse more later.

Not sure where to start? The site will offer virtual exhibitions in order to highlight some of the lesser-known artists and encourage people to download and reuse their work. Speaking of which, here’s what you need to know about reuse, per Hyperallergic:

At this stage, images available are of 2D artworks, such as paintings or photographs, that belong in the public sphere under a CC0 (Creative Commons Zero) license, which allows creators and owners of copyrighted or database-protected content to place those works in or as close as possible to the public domain. (Works still in copyright will be available as low definition files, so users can still get a feel for the museums’ collections online.)

According to a press release Paris Musées shared with Hyperallergic: “Making this data available guarantees that our digital files can be freely accessed and reused by anyone or everyone, without any technical, legal or financial restraints, whether for commercial use or not.”

via Lifehacker https://lifehacker.com

January 15, 2020 at 10:30AM

Report: 51 Members of Congress and Their Spouses Collectively Own Millions in Defense Stocks

https://gizmodo.com/report-51-members-of-congress-and-their-spouses-own-mi-1840984472

Troops with the U.S. Army’s 1st Armoured Battalion of the 9th Regiment, 1st Division from Fort Hood in Texas prepare for defense exercises in Lithuania in 2019.
Photo: Mindaugas Kulbis (AP)

51 members of Congress or their spouses own between $2.8 million to $5.3 million worth of stock in the top 30 defense contractors worldwide, Sludge reported on Monday, thus placing them in a position to potentially profit from the U.S. military contracting process or wars waged with the firms’ equipment.

According to Sludge, the data was compiled by having a bot sift through financial disclosure forms hosted on the House and Senate websites; the $2.5 million gap between the upper and lower estimates is because many members of Congress only report in ranges. 18 of the congresspeople collectively own up to $760,000 in Lockheed Martin, the world’s largest defense contractor by revenue, and which surged 4.3 percent after the Trump administration assassinated a top Iranian official by drone earlier this month, Sludge wrote.

According to the review, nearly one-third of the Senate Appropriations subcomittee for defense spending—which regularly reviews big-ticket expenditures in the billions of dollars for the U.S. military—own stocks in big contractors. Four members of the House Foreign Affairs committee, which approves arms sales, have stock in companies that must seek their approval to sell weaponry and other military equipment to foreigners. That list includes Honeywell, Lockheed Martin, and General Dynamics, per Sludge.

The investments appear to be broadly bipartisan. In the Senate, Dianne Feinstein ($650,000), Sheldon Whitehouse ($348,998), John Hoeven ($250,000), Tom Carper ($130,000), Rick Scott ($106,000), Susan Collins ($101,000), Roy Blunt ($100,000), and David Perdue ($100,000) top the list.

In the House, Steve Cohen ($415,000), Gerry Connolly ($400,000), Ro Khanna ($376,000), Greg Gianforte ($309,856), Debbie Dingell ($300,000), Phil Roe ($203,230), Fred Upton ($155,000), Bob Gibbs ($150,000), Joe Kennedy ($150,000), Kevin Hern ($150,000), Francis Rooney ($135,000), and David Joyce, David Price, and Thomas Suozzi ($100,000 each) come in on top.

Spokespeople for members of Congress contacted by Sludge said their or their spouses’ investments in defense contractors do not affect their decision-making. Senator Feinstein’s office told the site that she “has no involvement in her husband’s financial and business decisions” and that the $650,000 in Boeing stock belonging to her spouse was managed by a blind trust. Representative Ro Khanna, whose wife holds $376,000 in stock from seven defense companies, told Sludge that he has “not personally invested in any defense stocks” and has “consistently voted against bloated defense spending and sought accountability from some of our nation’s largest defense contractors.”

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) recently estimated that approximately $420 billion in arms sales were conducted globally in 2018, up around 4.6 percent from the year prior, according to USA Today. U.S. companies accounted for roughly 59 percent of sales by the top 100 contractors.

Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and L3 all saw their stocks rise in the wake of a Dec. 27, 2019 attack on a U.S. contractor in Iraq in the leadup to the drone assassination, Marketwatch recently reported. Estimates of the total U.S. defense budget have come in far higher than the $750 billion Donald Trump requested in his fiscal year 2020 budget, with a report by the Nation in May 2019 finding total defense-related spending requests came to around $1.25 trillion (“much of it wasted, misguided, or simply counterproductive”). Reports regularly find countless billions of dollars in Pentagon waste.

“Members of Congress should divest from all investments tied to their congressional responsibilities and avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest or ethics dilemmas,” Project on Government Oversight general counsel Scott Amey told Sludge.

Defense is one of the most politically powerful industries in DC. While overall donations to candidates are lower than many other sectors, Open Secrets data shows the industry donated over $27 million to candidates and committees from 2019-2020 and usually spends well over $100 million annually. In the wake of the U.S. strike on the Iranian official, retiring chairman of the House subcommittee on defense appropriations Representative Pete Visclosky was among the Democrats who remained silent. He received $1.7 million in campaign contributions from the defense industry since 1989, Sludge separately reported.

via Gizmodo https://gizmodo.com

January 13, 2020 at 08:57PM

Porsche applies to patent an all-electric VTOL flying taxi

https://www.autoblog.com/2020/01/13/porsche-vtol-flying-taxi-patent/

Porsche began talking up its bet on flying cars in early 2018. The automaker included an airborne passenger vehicle in its Strategy 2025 under “shaping the future of the sports car,” and a board member said engineers were “a very early stage” with concepts that would be “able to fly on [their] own completely from A to B, but also enabling the passenger or pilot to take control for a certain amount of time, if it stays within its [performance] envelope.” October of last year, Porsche signed a memorandum of understanding with Boeing to work together developing a concept for a “premium” electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) craft. Turns out that a few months before the official collaboration, Porsche filed two patent applications in July with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The Taycan EV Forum discovered the paperwork, one simply for “Aircraft,” the other for a “Power supply for an aircraft and corresponding aircraft.” Both show line images of a flying taxi that could have inspired the slick rendering released with the Boeing announcement.

This imagining is all-electric and autonomous, although the craft will be able to “grant normal control to humans if they are sufficiently qualified.” Compared to the rendering, which had a clearly extended nose section, the earlier patent drawings are more like a two-seat cockpit and stabilizer set into a large airfoil. Instead of the propellers we’re used to seeing on flying taxi concepts so far, Porsche engineers have gone for an array of ducted fans — a fixed pair of horizontal fans set forward in the airfoil, another pair of fans set into the trailing edge. Those at the back can swivel at least 90 degrees, providing a range of vertical and horizontal thrust. One of the drawings shows another possibility mentioned in the text: “The aircraft can be equipped with folded or even selectively foldable airfoils. One corresponding variant enlarges the wing area which is active during horizontal flying, without increasing the footprint of the aircraft, how­ever.”

A novel feature is an extendable bank of louvers over the horizontal fans. The slats open and close in the service of aerodynamic efficiency, such as during horizontal flying when the rear fans produce adequate thrust.

The patent also goes into detail about cooling systems for the high-voltage batteries in the cockpit. The text refers to a “cooling plate below the airfoil for dissipating heat from the electronic components and cooling fins for dissipating the heat which is output by the cooling plate,” and other ways to shunt battery heat to the edges of the airfoil. Even the fuel tank gets a mention, engineers having conceived of “aircraft fuel tank flammability reduction method by way of the feeding of compressed air into an air separation module which contains an oxygen separating membrane.”

A Porsche study completed in 2018 found that urban air transportation could increase significantly starting around 2025. We don’t expect to see a flying Porsche by then, but it’s clear the sports car maker plans on being ready when the time is right.

via Autoblog https://ift.tt/1afPJWx

January 13, 2020 at 10:33AM

The best Android apps for your Chromebook

https://www.popsci.com/story/diy/best-android-apps-chromebook/

With little hard drive memory, Chromebooks look like laptops but feel like tablets.

With little hard drive memory, Chromebooks look like laptops but feel like tablets. (Andrew Neel via Unsplash/)

Chromebooks today come with support for Android apps—you can load up Instagram, Twitter, Dropbox, and other useful tools just as you can on your mobile phone. But not all Android apps have been properly updated for Chrome OS—maybe they don’t support the use of a keyboard and trackpad, or maybe they’ll only run in a small window.

With that in mind, and to prevent you from diving into a tedious trial and error process, we’re here to guide you towards some of the best Android apps that really make full use of your Chromebook.

Netflix

No more trailer auto-play is enough of a reason to download the Netflix app.

No more trailer auto-play is enough of a reason to download the Netflix app. (David Nield/)

Video and movie apps are a no-brainer for your Chromebook, but there are a couple good reasons why you would want to load up the Netflix app for Android on Chrome OS rather than just logging in through a browser tab.

Offline downloads is one: the app lets you save selected content (including all Netflix Originals titles) to your Chromebook for when you’ve got a limited connection or none at all.

Besides offline downloads, the tablet-style interface makes it easier to browse through lists of seasons and episodes than it is on the web. Plus, it won’t annoy you by playing trailers automatically as you browse.

Netflix for Android (from $9 a month).

Apple Music

Besides a “Switch to iOS” tool, Apple Music is the only app Apple makes for Android, so if you subscribe to Apple Music, you’ll still have full access to all your tunes on your Chromebook.

The app makes full use of the space—you can get album artwork or lyrics that scroll by in real time on one side of the screen, while you browse playlists and recommendations on the other. The app works with the media playback keys on your Chromebook keyboard, too.

Just like Apple Music for Android phones, the app can sync albums and playlists to your device, which means your listening can carry on even if you lose your internet connection.

Apple Music for Android ($10 a month).

Adobe Photoshop Express

Definitely not the same as the full Photoshop software, but it carries most of the tools you'll need to get your pictures Instagram-ready.

Definitely not the same as the full Photoshop software, but it carries most of the tools you’ll need to get your pictures Instagram-ready. (David Nield/)

Though photo editing remains one of the weaker spots in the Chromebook productivity workflow, you can still find several tools that will do a good job at this, both on the web and in the Android app library. One of the best is Adobe Photoshop Express.

It doesn’t include all the tools you’ll find in the full Photoshop software, but it has all the basic functions that will help you crop and resize images, add filters and text, adjust brightness and contrast, fix red eye and blemishes, and more. There’s also a one-tap fix button for automatically adjusting color and tone.

The app makes full use of the space on a Chromebook screen, too, so there’s plenty of room for your images and the various effects and options. You can also easily save your pictures to the disk or share them to other apps.

Adobe Photoshop Express for Android (free).

Microsoft Word

You might be used to opening up Google Docs when you need to do some writing on your Chromebook, but we’d definitely recommend getting Word for Android installed as well, for a more traditional word processing experience.

You’ll get a full range of text formatting options, the ability to drop in pictures, shapes, and tables, and support for headers, footers, and columns. It’s not quite the powerhouse of a program that Word on Windows is, but it has more than enough for most users. You can share and collaborate on documents with others, too.

The only catch is that Word for Android isn’t free on screens above 10.1 inches in size—which most Chromebooks are—so you’ll need an Office 365 subscription (from $7 a month). This also gets you Excel, PowerPoint, and the other Office apps too, across desktop and mobile.

Microsoft Word for Android (from $7 a month).

ArtFlow

ArtFlow can be the key to unleashing all of your artistic potential. Just look at that gorgeous, realistic looking tree.

ArtFlow can be the key to unleashing all of your artistic potential. Just look at that gorgeous, realistic looking tree. (David Nield/)

Unlock your creativity by installing ArtFlow on your Chrome OS laptop—it’s one of the best drawing programs for Android devices, and since Chromebook has a bigger display than a phone or a regular tablet, you’ll get a much bigger canvas to work on.

The app comes with a choice of 20 different drawing brushes, as well as an eraser and smudge and fill tools. You can use your finger or a stylus to start sketching or painting, though you’re going to need a touchscreen for this one, which most Chromebooks now have.

ArtFlow supports layers as well, so you can work separately on different elements of your digital masterpiece before combining them. If you want to work with more tools, features and layers, you can go for a pro license ($5).

ArtFlow for Android (free or $5).

Firefox

Using Chrome OS doesn’t mean you have to use Chrome as your web browser—there are plenty of alternatives to pick from in the Google Play Store, including the ever-improving, privacy-focused Firefox.

Take full control over the ways that websites can and can’t track you, jump quickly between multiple tabs, and even install browser extensions. If you use Firefox on some or all of your other devices, then you can also sync your passwords, bookmarks, browsing history, and other data to your Chromebook.

Firefox is equally happy running in full-screen mode or in a smaller window floating on top of other apps, which is handy if you’re working in parallel with other apps or looking up something on the web.

Firefox for Android (free).

Gmail

Get that inbox down to zero by swiping and deleting.

Get that inbox down to zero by swiping and deleting. (David Nield/)

Of course, you can load up Gmail in a web browser on your Chromebook and it’ll work perfectly well—with offline support, too—but the Android app will give you access to a few extra tricks for powering through your inbox.

Gmail for Android has a useful tablet-style layout that puts your message list on the left, and individual email previews on the right, making it easier to read messages and filter those that are not worth your time. The app also supports some of the functionalities of Gmail for Android, so you can swipe across emails to archive or delete them.

On top of that, all the usual Gmail goodness is here—support for multiple email accounts, automatic sorting of important and unimportant messages, powerful search options, and more.

Gmail for Android (free).

Your favorite games

"I prefer my games on a smaller screen, actually," said no one ever.

"I prefer my games on a smaller screen, actually," said no one ever. (David /)

We won’t pick out just one example here, but a Chromebook works great for Android gaming—though finding games that work well on Chrome OS can be a bit of a process. Overall, slower, less-demanding games work best.

If you do find your favorite games run smoothly on your Chromebook, the benefits are obvious: your games of choice are displayed at a much bigger size and you can control them using a trackpad and keyboard, rather than tapping on the screen.

Games we can vouch for as offering a good experience on Chrome OS include Alto’s Odyssey (free with in-app purchases), Grand Theft Auto: Vice City ($5), Fallout Shelter (free with in-app purchases), and Crossy Road (free with in-app purchases), but you’ll sure be able to find plenty more.

via Popular Science – New Technology, Science News, The Future Now https://www.popsci.com

January 13, 2020 at 04:32PM