Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s ‘Everything Is Love’ Marks a New Step in the Album’s Evolution

Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s ‘Everything Is Love’ Marks a New Step in the Album’s Evolution

https://ift.tt/2MCFgvX

On Saturday night under the shield of London Stadium, just as Beyoncé and Jay-Z brought their most recent “On The Run II” tour date to a close, a large sign announced itself with a playful wink: “ALBUM OUT NOW.” It was the latest message from two artists whose careers have been marked by public dramas both cryptic and blunt—they had again summoned their congregation; the long-anticipated joint album was finally, startlingly, here.

The days since have augured all manner of revelations: the project, titled Everything Is Love, is a measured exegesis on themes hauntingly mundane to the Carters—family and success, love and betrayal of the flesh. It is a fitting finale to the couple’s unofficial musical trilogy, which began in 2016 with Beyoncé’s Lemonade, an album of sheer grace and fury—which was also televised through an hour-long broadcast on HBO—and continued on 4:44, Jay-Z’s 2017 apology record, where he, at last, owned to his infidelity. “I apologize to all the women whom I toyed with your emotions/’Cause I was emotionless,” he rapped to his wife on the title track.

Still, one of the more remarkable aspects of Everything Is Love is its economy; spread across nine tracks, it clocks in at just under 40 minutes. The album—a lean and loud thing; puffed up but never obnoxiously self-important—descends as the omega of Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s years-long saga of woe and redemption. It is, in every formulation, an album of the moment—one that slyly speaks to the evolutionary shifts befalling the music industry but also reconstructs that narrative into something new and strange and necessary.

To lacerating effect, the Carters—as they are officially billed on Tidal, the streaming platform the couple has a stake in, where the album was exclusively housed for 24 hours before coming to Spotify and Apple Music—chart the passageways of how they got to where they are, all while having fun along the way. New York Magazine‘s Craig Jenkins encapsulated the album’s all-embracing sentiment perfectly: “It’s the sweetest possible ending to the trauma of the last two records, husband and wife united in shade and shit-talk,” he wrote, concluding: “The message isn’t ‘Y’all could never do this.’ It’s that against all odds, two of us just did.”

The album, as genre, is currently undergoing a remolding. Along with Everything Is Love, a mostly unconnected string of releases from Tierra Whack (Whack World), Kanye West (ye), Matt & Kim (Almost Everyday), Pusha-T (Daytona), Nas (NASIR), and Kid Cudi and West (Kids See Ghosts), have adopted an intentionally spare framework—the 15-track Whack World, for example, runs just 15 minutes. They are projects that test the boundaries of how we come to understand what an album is, and what it ought to be. Of late, one central thesis has taken hold: In an overstuffed music landscape, where, according to the New York Times, “woozy, blown-out rap albums” govern the charts, moderation has become an antithetical form of self-optimization. As it turns out, by doing less—slender track arrangements, compact running times—these artists have done and said more than their contemporaries.

One of the more remarkable aspects of Everything Is Love is its economy. It is an album of the moment—one that slyly speaks to the evolutionary shifts befalling the music industry but also reconstructs that narrative into something new and strange and necessary.

The album as we know it—a loose or tightly-woven collection of audio recordings that, per rules outlined by The Recording Academy must be either 30 minutes in length, or 15 minutes in length with a minimum of 5 tracks to qualify as such—has experienced radical alterations in the last decade, fragmented into three distinct categories: The album as album, the album as playlist, and, more recently, the album as EP.

Historically, albums were statement pieces for artists—the culmination of weeks, or months, or years of work siphoned into a cohesive, crackling exposition. Think Kendrick Lamar’s To Pimp a Butterfly, D’Angelo’s Black Messiah, Beyonce’s Lemonade, or even West’s 2016 mantlepiece The Life of Pablo. These albums were meant to exist in the multiple, registering as events and as cultural tentpoles: constantly played and constantly argued over. It was the album at its most maximalist and moutwhwatering.

Naturally, that all changed with the rise of the streaming marketplace, which again revamped the album’s algorithm. The album was no longer solely occupied with the statement it was trying to make; albums were now optimized for playlists. They’d become bloated experiments in global fusion (Drake’s 22-track, 81-minute-long More Life) and creative anarchy (Future’s HNDRXX and FUTURE; 17 tracks each and released a week apart), ceding authority to streaming overlords, whose business models, in part, prioritized artists with the most spins (in 2017, streaming accounted for two-thirds the music industry’s revenue). Albums of a such repute heralded a permanent shift in the calculus of pop power.

Even Cardi B’s brilliant and ferocious Invasion of Privacy, released in April, translated more as a collection of singles than a unified album, spurred in part by the playlist-centric projects of 2017 and 2018. Cardi’s ascent started with the placement of “Bodak Yellow” on Apple’s A-List: Hip Hop playlist and later on Spotify’s Rap Caviar, where it skyrocketed. “It doesn’t feel like a hit, it feels like a moment,” Apple’s Carl Cherry told Billboard at the time. In our new song-based economy, albums had become a kind of dead weight. Just look to Rae Sremmurd’s “Black Beatles” and Migos’ “Bad and Boujee”—tracks that accrued an incredible amount of viral currency and nearly eclipsed each group’s respective album (both songs peaked at Number One on the Hot 100).

Lately, though, the album has evolved into a slight, willowy offering—it’s the EP all grown up. The batch of releases out of GOOD Music—West, Cudi, and Pusha-T, with a Teyana Taylor project set to follow—demonstrate a new configuration for the genre. Particularly Daytona and Kids See Ghosts, which adopt the song-craving appetite of the streaming era and apply it to a condensed album format: expertly curated with no clutter, just seven songs that demand rotation. Whack, a 22-year-old singer and rapper from Philadelphia with an absurdist bent, took the concept one step further with Whack World—each song is exactly one-minute long but feels a galaxy wide—telling the Times: “I have a really short attention span, but I have so much to offer. I wanted to put all of these ideas into one universe, one world. I’m giving you a trip through my mind.”

Even in such a unsteady industry, the album has remained a constant, and malleable, asset. What the Carters have essentially done with their latest is reconstruct the before into the now. It is a lean, pluralistic Megazord of an album—a statement EP suited for every kind of playlist. For two artists who have an appetite for grandiosity, Everything Is Love—for all its swagger and self-praise—reads as a decidedly controlled piece of art. It is Beyoncé and Jay-Z doing what they have always done: giving us what we didn’t know we needed until we had it.


More Great WIRED Stories

Tech

via Wired Top Stories https://ift.tt/2uc60ci

June 19, 2018 at 03:03PM

I Can’t Believe Apple Made This

I Can’t Believe Apple Made This

https://ift.tt/2JY1WEV

From Stacks to mess.
GIF: Andrew Liszewski (Apple)

Aside from the new dark mode UI in Mojave, one of the most useful additions to the next version of macOS is Stacks, a feature that automatically sorts and arranges all the files on your desktop into tidy little groups.

It’s a quick and easy way to declutter all the photos, PDFs, random downloads, and whatever else is making your computer screen look like a garbage dump. But in some ways, Stacks makes cleaning up your junk a little too easy, which is why we were so excited to learn that in Mojave, there’s a hidden option that brings back the chaos.

It was first discovered by @ChrisMorrigOG on Twitter, but we were able to replicate it in house as well. First you’ll need to turn off Stacks. That’s in the Finder menu bar. Go to View and then tick off the Use Stacks option. Next right click anywhere on the desktop. You’ll see Clean Up. Now press the Option key and Clean Up will become Mess Up. From there, all you have to do is click, and then revel in the madness as all your previously organized files get scattered randomly across your screen.

And even though I struggle to see how useful the Mess Up option would actually be on a day-to-day basis, with seemingly every new gadget or app so hellbent on improving speed and efficiency, it’s rather refreshing to see a feature that does the complete opposite. Congratulations Apple, you’ve made tech fun again, even if it’s only for a hot second.

P.S. You better not remove this feature before Mojave gets released in the fall.

Tech

via Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com

June 19, 2018 at 01:15PM

Facebook’s live gameshows could take a bite out of HQ Trivia

Facebook’s live gameshows could take a bite out of HQ Trivia

https://ift.tt/2K1lgRR


Facebook

Instead of creating its own HQ Trivia competitor, Facebook has taken a broader approach and created an entire gaming platform. The company announced polls for Live and on demand videos as well as new gamification features for Live videos. Partners like Insider, BuzzFeed and Fresno can add polls, quizzes and challenges to both individual videos as well as entire game show series.

Confetti by Insider is an interactive pop culture trivia game show that will air daily. Like HQ, Confetti will let you see what your friends answer, but on an every day basis. Cash prizes are on offer if you answer all the questions right; you’ll split the pot if more than one person gets them all. Outside Your Bubble by BuzzFeed News will apparently challenge players to guess what others “across the cultural divide” are thinking, while What’s in the Box by Fresno will let you guess what’s in a closed box. Guess correctly to win prizes.

In addition to these interactive video features, Facebook is adding more content to Watch and rolling out Top Fan badges to more creator communities. There’s also a new video template for Pages that puts video and community more prominently on a Page. Creators and publishers can try it out, and revert back easily, as well. Finally, there’s a new Brand Collabs Manager, which will let brands search and find creators on Facebook to make deals and partnerships.

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

June 19, 2018 at 01:33PM

Verizon and AT&T will stop selling your phone’s location to data brokers

Verizon and AT&T will stop selling your phone’s location to data brokers

https://ift.tt/2JYL2pK

Verizon and AT&T have promised to stop selling their mobile customers’ location information to third-party data brokers, following a security problem that leaked the real-time location of US cell phone users.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) recently urged all four major carriers to stop the practice, and today he published responses he received from Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile USA, and Sprint.

Wyden’s statement praised Verizon for “taking quick action to protect its customers’ privacy and security,” but he criticized the other carriers for not making the same promise.

“After my investigation and follow-up reports revealed that middlemen are selling Americans’ location to the highest bidder without their consent or making it available on insecure Web portals, Verizon did the responsible thing and promptly announced it was cutting these companies off,” Wyden said. “In contrast, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint seem content to continuing to sell their customers’ private information to these shady middle men, Americans’ privacy be damned.”

AT&T changed its stance shortly after Wyden’s statement. “Our top priority is to protect our customers’ information, and, to that end, we will be ending our work with aggregators for these services as soon as practical in a way that preserves important, potential lifesaving services like emergency roadside assistance,” AT&T said in a statement to Ars.

Sen. Wyden recognized AT&T’s change on Twitter and called on T-Mobile and Sprint to follow suit.

Sprint told Ars that it has “nothing additional to share.” We also asked T-Mobile for a response to Wyden’s statement and will update this story if the carrier answers. T-Mobile told Wyden that it will continue the data aggregation program but that it has “appropriate controls” in place.

Privacy invasion

It was revealed last month that prison phone company Securus offers a service enabling law enforcement officers to locate most American cell phones within seconds. Securus’ service relies on data from LocationSmart, a data aggregator. It was also reported that a LocationSmart bug could have allowed anyone to surreptitiously track the real-time whereabouts of cell phone users.

Tech

via Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com

June 19, 2018 at 01:21PM

First Ladies Unite Against Separating Children At Border

First Ladies Unite Against Separating Children At Border

https://ift.tt/2MBQl0h

Critics of U.S. government policy that separates children from their parents when they cross the border illegally from Mexico protest in downtown LA on June 14. The former first ladies, and Melania Trump, have pushed back against the policy.

Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

Critics of U.S. government policy that separates children from their parents when they cross the border illegally from Mexico protest in downtown LA on June 14. The former first ladies, and Melania Trump, have pushed back against the policy.

Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

America’s current and former First Ladies are pushing back against the Trump Administration’s practice of separating children from their parents at the border in an effort to curb illegal crossings.

And they’ve largely been out in front of their husbands in doing so.

The opposition comes from both Republicans and Democrats — even including expressions of concern from President Trump’s own wife, First Lady Melania Trump.

In a statement, her spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham said the First Lady “hates to see children separated from their families” and called on the country to govern “with heart.” The statement also expressed hope for bipartisan immigration reform. Melania Trump has made the well-being of children the major focus of her “Be Best” policy initiative.

The responses from former first ladies, including Republican Laura Bush, have been more pointed. In an op-ed in Sunday’s Washington Post and on Twitter, Bush called out the separation of children from their parents as “cruel” and “immoral.”

The wives of former Democratic presidents have spoken out against the Trump Administration’s policy more quickly, and often more forcefully, than their husbands.

On Monday, former first lady Michelle Obama retweeted Laura Bush’s comments, adding “Sometimes truth transcends party.”

Her husband later retweeted her.

Former first lady and 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton has repeatedly opposed the policy in multiple tweets in over the past few weeks. She has also encouraged her supporters to donate to immigrant-rights organizations.

Her husband, former President Bill Clinton, followed suit on Sunday, with a Father’s Day tweet, saying, “These children should not be a negotiating tool” in the immigration debate.

Rosalynn Carter, wife of former President Jimmy Carter, has also weighed in, issuing a statement on Monday calling the policy “disgraceful and a shame to our country.”

There’s a long history of first ladies advocating for issues important to them, often issues related to children. But what’s unusual is to have all the living former presidents’ wives speaking out in one voice, said Peter Slevin, a journalism professor and author of a biography of Michelle Obama.

“When was the last time Laura Bush, Rosalynn Carter, Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton spoke out, in one voice, on anything?” Slevin said in an email to NPR. “Each of these former first ladies uses her megaphone in a different way, when using it at all. It’s extraordinary that they’re united in attacking a highly politicized policy of a sitting president.”

Slevin added, “When Melania Trump calls on the country’s leaders to govern ‘with heart,’ it certainly suggests greater solidarity with her predecessors than with her husband.”

The big question is whether these bipartisan expressions of concern from former first ladies, and Melania Trump herself, will make a policy impact. Dr. Jeanne Abrams, an author and historian of first ladies at the University of Denver, noted that first ladies often have been “sounding boards for their husbands’ thinking and often were ahead of the curve before their husbands on social issues.”

For example, she said, Abigail Adams wrote a letter to her husband, President John Adams, advocating for women’s rights; Eleanor Roosevelt was known her advocacy for civil rights before her husband embraced the issue.

“With intimate access to the ear of the president, first ladies have often slowly but determinedly pushed their husbands to moderate their positions. Melania Trump is not unusual in this, but President Trump appears to be more implacable than many of our former presidents,” Abrams said.

The current and former first ladies’ opposition to separating families is in line with that of American voters; polls show a majority of Americans oppose the policy, with Democrats overwhelmingly opposing it and opinions among Republican more mixed.

News

via NPR Topics: News https://ift.tt/2m0CM10

June 19, 2018 at 10:27AM

1,300 Professors Sign Letter Condemning Separation of Immigrant Families as Child Abuse

1,300 Professors Sign Letter Condemning Separation of Immigrant Families as Child Abuse

https://ift.tt/2JRulRe

Photo of an immigration holding facility in Texas passed to AP by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Rio Grande Valley Sector
Photo: AP

More than 2,000 academics, including graduate students, postdoctoral researchers, and at least 1,300 professors, have signed a letter denouncing the Department of Homeland Security’s policy separating immigrant children from their families at the border.

The letter opens:

As scholars of education, history, psychology, sociology, and various other academic fields and disciplines, we unequivocally denounce the policies and practices that separate immigrant families, particularly children from primary care givers. We are also educators and (many of us) state employees who carry the charge to serve and advocate for children and families in the states where we work as faculty and to support the development of a healthy generation of young people, more broadly. Our peers, and indeed several of us in this letter, have written to you, offering you evidence of why the unconscionable practice of separating children from their parents and caregivers, accompanying adults, and guardians at the border is not only unsound practice but also untenable.

You are likely aware that White House policy has resulted in immigrant children being separated from their caregivers. The children have been sent to detention centers, which were recently added to Wikipedia’s list of concentration and internment camps. Experts consider it a form of child abuse. The president and present administration, including DHS head Kristjen Nielsen, have attempted to shift the blame with falsehoods, or argue that the inhuman practice is simply enforcing the law. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has had to explain why the policy is not like Nazi Germany.

Much of the country is rightly outraged. Two-thirds of the country is opposed to the policy, though more than half of Republicans support it, according to a recent poll.

The letter uses research to demonstrate how the separations can induce trauma in children and lead to a number of negative consequences as they grow. That includes a higher chance of cognitive impairment or adoption of risky behaviors. It points out that there is plenty of data available on the policy’s potential effects given the Holocaust and Native American boarding schools. The signatories say punishing these children “is tantamount to government-sanctioned child abuse” and call for “the immediate reunification of minors and their primary caregivers.”

But why academics, and why so many? Many of the signatories have studied these effects. “By signing a letter together, we are engaging in a collective action that amplifies this message more than one person can do alone,” Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Washington, told Gizmodo. “Importantly it sends a signal about what kind of community academia should be: one that is welcoming to immigrants, regardless of why or how they ended up in the United States.”

A form is available for academics interested in signing onto the letter. It ends: “We therefore unequivocally demand that these practices be immediately halted and children be reunited with their parents and caregivers. We urge you to act now.”

Tech

via Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com

June 19, 2018 at 11:03AM

Inside the Mad Lab That’s Getting Robots to Walk and Jump Like Us

Inside the Mad Lab That’s Getting Robots to Walk and Jump Like Us

https://ift.tt/2MsN435

I stand in front of a lanky two-legged robot stomping along a treadmill. I watch, all impressed, until the researcher next to me tells me to trip it. The thing looks expensive, so I hesitate. Really, he tells me, it’s OK. And he probably knows better than I do, so I drag my boot along its shin like a good soccer trip.

The robot stammers, yet recovers. And then again, and again. No matter how much I pester it, the thing just keeps stomping. I keep feeling guilty.

Here in the Amber Lab at Caltech, they call this “disturbance testing,” not “assault,” which makes me feel a bit better. There’s a point to it, by the way: These researchers are doing everything they can to not just master robotic walking, but to prepare these machines for life in the real world.

But why robots with legs? What’s wrong with wheels? Nothing, except that truly useful robots will have to be able to tackle everything humans can. “That means we have to have walking robots that go on grass, on gravel, on snow, on ice,” says roboticist Aaron Ames, who runs Amber Lab—that stands for Advanced Mechanical Bipedal Experimental Robotics. “So how do we make that extension? How do we get robots to work in these very unstructured unknown environments?”

At its core, the work here is about developing the mathematics of bipedal locomotion. “Mathematically understand walking, and at a fundamental level you’re going to be able to not only walk, but walk efficiently, walk dynamically, and walk in a way that’s human-like in its simplicity and beauty,” says Ames.

The bipedal robots that walk this world are governed by the same basic mathematical functions. The robot that I tried to trip, it’s relatively simple—it’s attached to scaffolding, so it only has to worry about going forwards and backwards, not tipping side to side. What Ames and his team can do is test out some new algorithms here, optimize them, and then port them to a more complex robot. “We’re going to ultimately find that we’re missing something, so we go back to the simpler robot and we iterate,” says Ames.

Take jumping, for instance. Up against a wall in the Amber Lab is a robot that bounces up and down a scaffolding like a piston. “We start simple and we get it to hop,” says Ames. “And then when we understand that we can do things like graduate it to Cassie and make Cassie jump.”

Cassie, if you’re wondering, is a pair of robotic ostrich-looking legs that’ll set you back several hundred thousand dollars. It’s a research platform, so it’s relatively easy for scientists like Ames to fiddle with its code and pull new tricks. Over at the University of Michigan, for instance, they’ve been making Cassie walk through fire and ride a Segway, because why the hell not.

The Amber Lab, though, has figured out how to make Cassie jump. Which is way more difficult than it sounds. “You have to crouch down, you have to compress all those springs, you have to jump off,” says Ames. “You have this air time where you can’t interact with the world at all, and you have to land and then stick that landing.” The result is a robot with some serious velociraptor vibes, even if for our visit Cassie was having trouble sticking the landing. (See video at top.)

So, robots in this lab are jumping and stomping and surviving disturbance testing. Great for the robots—but also great for humans. Because Ames and his team are taking what they’re learning and applying it to a one-of-a-kind robotic prosthesis: Ampro. “All the things we’re shooting for in walking robots, we’re trying to achieve on prosthetics,” says Ames. “So we want efficient walking, efficient for the user as well as the device.”

Ampro’s efficiency comes from its clever interfacing with the user. The battery-powered prosthetic has a motor in the knee and in the ankle, which are paired with springs. It also uses a sensor that detects where the user is in their gait, and reacts accordingly, powering the motors to move the prosthesis in sync with the wearer.

Not only does that make for a more efficient movement, but a more dynamic, natural one as well. “You don’t want to have somebody that might be an amputee only walking around, right,” says Ames. “They should be able to restore more life function, like running, playing soccer, or jumping—all the things we’re working on here.” As they achieve a new behavior on a robot, they then translate that advance over to the prosthetic to improve the mobility of the user.

Developing biped robots isn’t just about developing biped robots, at least not in this lab. It’s about taking insights into locomotion and applying them to robotic mobility and human-robotic mobility. So what begins as a simple trip or a bounce or a leap, ends up as an algorithm that spreads across the robotic spectrum.


More Great WIRED Stories

Tech

via Wired Top Stories https://ift.tt/2uc60ci

June 14, 2018 at 07:03AM