Facebook has quietly altered its terms of service, making stricter Irish data protection laws no longer binding on the vast majority of its users. The revision was first reported Wednesday by Reuters.
Now, Facebook’s headquarters in California will be responsible for processing any relevant legal claims, and American law will be binding for those outside the EU.
Previously, CEO Mark Zuckerberg had said Facebook would implement new EU rules “everywhere.” While Facebook may claim that it is offering EU-style control globally, removing this provision in its own terms of service suggests that the company is trying to mitigate its potential legal liability.
“We want to be clear that there is nothing different about the controls and protections we offer around the world,” the company wrote in a public blog post on Tuesday. However, this doesn’t appear to apply to the specific legal terms, but is limited, instead, to the features in Facebook itself.
Prior to the change, Facebook users not only in the European Union, but worldwide—outside of the United States and Canada—were subject to Irish laws as they had signed a contract with Facebook Ireland Limited.
The United States, for example, does not enshrine an affirmative right of individuals to access data held by private companies.
By comparison, according to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner: “Under Section 3 of the Data Protection Acts, you have a right to find out, free of charge, if a person (an individual or an organization) holds information about you. You also have a right to be given a description of the information and to be told the purpose(s) for holding your information.”
The EU’s official GDPR site notes several differences in the new law, including, notably: “In general, consent needs to be explicit, opt-in, and freely given. This means popular opt-out-based consent of today will no longer be acceptable.”
Among other changes in EU law, violations of the GDPR also provide stiff penalties for breaches of European rules: up to four percent of worldwide revenue, or €20 million, whichever is higher for large companies like Facebook.
Facebook Ireland Limited in Dublin is believed to have been created largely for tax minimization reasons.
“If you are a resident of or have your principal place of business in the US or Canada, this Statement is an agreement between you and Facebook, Inc,” the terms had previously stated. “Otherwise, this Statement is an agreement between you and Facebook Ireland Limited.”
Now, the relevant language has been changed to: “These Terms (formerly known as the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities) make up the entire agreement between you and Facebook, Inc. regarding your use of our Products. They supersede any prior agreements.”
Facebook, which declined to respond to Ars’ questions on the record, said that the change had been made in the name of the companies’ business interests. The company declined to elaborate further.
Netflix, Amazon, and the major film studios have once again joined forces to sue the maker of a TV service and hardware device, alleging that the products are designed to illegally stream copyrighted videos.
The lawsuit was filed against the company behind Set TV, which sells a $20-per-month TV service with more than 500 channels.
“Defendants market and sell subscriptions to ‘Setvnow,’ a software application that Defendants urge their customers to use as a tool for the mass infringement of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted motion pictures and television shows,” the complaint says. Besides Netflix and Amazon, the plaintiffs are Columbia Pictures, Disney, Paramount Pictures, Twentieth Century Fox, Universal, and Warner Bros.
The complaint was filed Friday in US District Court for the Central District of California. The companies are asking for permanent injunctions to prevent further distribution of Set TV software and devices, the impoundment of Set TV devices, and for damages including the defendants’ profits.
Live TV channels
Set TV’s website says its applications let customers view TV channels on Windows, Mac, Android, and other platforms. The company also sells an $89 set top box that is preloaded with its software.
“Whether their customers choose a subscription or a preloaded box, what Defendants actually sell is illegal access to Plaintiffs’ Copyrighted Works,” the complaint says.
The Set TV service offers “a user-friendly interface and reliable access to popular content,” just like legitimate streaming services, but “customers only pay money to Defendants, not to Plaintiffs and other content creators upon whose copyrighted works Defendants’ business depends,” the lawsuit says.
Set TV’s website advertises access to live channels such as ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, ESPN, Bloomberg, TNT, FX, USA, Bravo, MTV, VH1, Comedy Central, HBO, Showtime, Starz, Cinemax, and many others. Customers are told that they can watch all those channels for $20 a month, with “no long-term commitments, no activation fees, no cancellation fees, [and] no credit check.”
“The Setvnow application provides a built-in media player and curated menus of live television channels and on-demand television show episodes and movies,” the industry lawsuit says.
When a user selects a channel, “Setvnow begins streaming the selected content from third-party sources,” the complaint says. “These sources capture live transmissions of the above-listed television channels, convert the copies of the television programs into streaming-friendly formats, and then retransmit the entirety of the live broadcasts over the Internet.”
Set TV provides access to on-demand video in a similar way, “rel[ying] on third-party sources that illicitly reproduce copyrighted works and then provide streams of popular content such as movies still exclusively in theaters and television shows,” the lawsuit says. The industry says that Set TV advertises its service “as a substitute for authorized and legitimate distribution channels such as cable television or video-on-demand services like Amazon Prime Video and Netflix.”
Netflix shows such as Stranger Things and some of Amazon’s original movies are among the on-demand videos whose copyrights were violated by Set TV, according to an industry court filing.
Set TV’s terms of use tell customers that they may not use the Set TV service to violate copyrights. The terms instruct copyright owners to notify Set TV by mail if “any Content, User Material, or other material provided through the Services, including through a link, infringes” their copyrights.
Set TV owner Jason LaBossiere is also a defendant in the case. In 2014, Google filed a complaint against LaBossiere in order to gain control of the androidtv.com and xbmcandroidtv.com domain names, alleging that he misused Google’s trademark to sell TV devices. Both domain names are now controlled by Google.
We left a message with Set TV today and will update this story if we get a response. Calls to a phone number listed for LaBossiere could not be completed.
Netflix, Amazon, and the studios previously sued the makers of the similar “Dragon Box” and “Tickbox.” A lawyer for the Dragon Box company told Ars in January that the product merely links to content online and that the entertainment industry is “fighting tooth and nail against innovation and technology.”
How The Tiny Nation Of Georgia Became A Bitcoin Behemoth
https://ift.tt/2qUHYma
Cryptocurrency mining has come to the Alazani Valley in eastern Georgia. U.S.-based company Bitfury accounts for much of the buzz.
Andrew North for NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Andrew North for NPR
Cryptocurrency mining has come to the Alazani Valley in eastern Georgia. U.S.-based company Bitfury accounts for much of the buzz.
Andrew North for NPR
Since long before anyone can remember, the big, fertile slopes of the Alazani Valley in eastern Georgia have been planted with grape vines. It’s the heartland of wine-making in the country that invented it 8,000 years ago. But in recent months, the valley has been going through a new kind of ferment, because of bitcoin.
“You see that building there with the power line outside,” says Bezhani Buzhaidze, pointing to an abandoned-looking, cinder block storehouse in his hometown of Telavi, the hub of Georgian wine country. “That’s being turned into a data center for mining cryptocurrencies.”
It’s another sign of how this tiny former Soviet republic of fewer than 4 million people has become a virtual printing press for this new money you can’t see.
Cryptocurrency mining is the digital equivalent of minting real money, except that anyone with the right hardware and software can do it, by taking part in what amounts to a giant virtual competition. Think of it like a lottery, where computers linked across the Internet compete to solve complex mathematical puzzles, with the number of players constantly rising. The owner of the computer that finds the right solution is rewarded with a “block” of bitcoin or other cryptocurrency, which is then registered and verified on a decentralized database system known as the blockchain.
In practice, it involves a kind of constant digital bombardment to find these solutions, 24 hours a day, consuming huge amounts of electricity. And thanks to its cheap hydropower and low regulation, Georgia is now ranked second in the world for cryptocurrency mining — behind only China.
A single U.S.-based technology company called Bitfury has been accounting for much of this mining activity, from a vast data center filled with computer servers which it opened on the outskirts of the capital Tbilisi. It has generated plenty of controversy too over claims that it received overly generous terms for its electricity bills. But scores of smaller data centers have now sprouted up, with many more people mining from home with processors bought online from China.
One Georgian political party has even started raising funds by mining cryptocurrency via the computers of willing supporters. And because electricity has traditionally been more heavily subsidized in the Alazani Valley, wine country has been seeing a kind of digital gold rush.
Hoodie-wearing Buzhaidze is one of the growing army of home prospectors. He signed up last summer, as he watched the price of bitcoin surge, borrowing several thousand dollars from his father to buy three graphic cards, the backbone of any home mining operation. Ever since, they have been churning away 24 hours a day in the family living room, a constant low hiss emitting from their cooling fans.
Bezhani Buzhaidze is one of the growing army of home prospectors for cryptocurrency mining in Georgia.
Andrew North for NPR
hide caption
toggle caption
Andrew North for NPR
Bezhani Buzhaidze is one of the growing army of home prospectors for cryptocurrency mining in Georgia.
Andrew North for NPR
“See, here, I’ve made about $14 so far today,” Buzhaidze says, scrolling through brightly colored graphs and figures on an app on his smartphone. Late last year, he was making an average of $800 a month mining a currency called Zcash, with the extra electricity load costing about $80.
His earnings are down now from the highs of last year, but it is still a healthy supplement to his monthly salary working at an online marketing company in Telavi.
Part of the attraction, Buzhaidze admits, is “easy money.” Four of his friends also have home-mining rigs. “Everyone is doing it,” he says smiling. But he adds he is also attracted by the libertarian promise of cryptocurrencies. “We won’t need banks any more,” he says. “It will be good for society.”
That is the question. Is this crypto boom going to help or hinder Georgia, a country still struggling with widespread poverty?
“Exercise caution”
Some see an opportunity for Georgia to vault ahead, by embracing the technology and libertarian philosophy underpinning cryptocurrencies. But skeptics fear the country has become an outsourcing center for the global crypto craze, creating few jobs and no lasting gain if it all comes crashing down.
The National Bank of Georgia, the equivalent of the Federal Reserve, has issued a warning, urging people to “exercise caution” about investing in virtual currencies.
“This is high-tech gambling,” says professor Gocha Tutberidze, a former regulatory official with the bank, who now teaches at the European University in Tbilisi. “The profits just go offshore,” he says, to big players like Bitfury.
It certainly looks that way on Bitfury’s website, which has videos showing executives enjoying ritzy gatherings on the private tropical island of British billionaire Richard Branson. The company reportedly earned over $90 million in revenue last year, though how much of that was profit is not public. It has positioned itself as a one-stop shop for all aspects of the business, making its own mining chips and software, and consulting other organizations that want to set up data centers or use blockchain technology. While it has offices in San Francisco and Washington D.C., Bitfury is registered in the Cayman Islands and releases only minimal financial information.
A shop in Sandy, Utah, mints physical versions of bitcoins, with codes protected by tamper-proof holographic seals.
Rick Bowmer/AP
hide caption
toggle caption
Rick Bowmer/AP
A shop in Sandy, Utah, mints physical versions of bitcoins, with codes protected by tamper-proof holographic seals.
Rick Bowmer/AP
It has an outsize presence in Georgia. According to Bitfury’s own figures, it was using around 28 million kilowatt-hours of electricity per month for its mining operations here, equal to the average consumption of 120,000 Georgian households, or 10 percent of the population. But it pays significantly less per unit, which has fueled charges that Georgia is getting ripped off.
Opposition politicians have claimed that the country’s richest man, former Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili, is a hidden beneficiary. An investment fund linked with the billionaire tycoon loaned money to Bitfury when it first arrived. But the company’s lawyer in Georgia, Eprem Urumushavili, says the loan was repaid, and denies any financial ties remain. However, the vice chairman of Bitfury’s board, George Kikvadze, also has a senior role on Ivanishvili’s fund.
Perhaps hoping to sidestep all this controversy, Bitfury recently announced it had sold its main data center to a Chinese concern. But its logo is still emblazoned on the building. And it remains the landlord, according to Urumashvili, as the company runs the surrounding tax-free zone where the data center operates.
Bitfury has had unfair press, its lawyer says, insisting that it is looking far beyond mining bitcoin in Georgia. Last year, it helped the government become the world’s first to start using a blockchain-based database to secure public records — with the company providing server space and technical expertise.
As with cryptocurrencies, records encrypted on a blockchain are distributed across countless computers, with no single entity having control, making the system both more resilient and harder to tamper with. It began with a property registry. Next will come marriage certificates and other personal records.
Bitfury has also been talking to the authorities in nearby Ukraine about using blockchain technology to run future elections there. Advocates say this will make it much harder to hack the voting process, in light of allegations that Russia tried to do just that in previous Ukrainian polls, even before accusations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.
One small, ultra-libertarian Georgian opposition party has more radical ideas. If it ever gains power, the party Girchi — which translates as “pinecone” — wants to issue a national Georgian cryptocurrency allowing citizens to buy unused state assets, including large areas of land. “We want to privatize it all,” says the party leader, Zurab Japaridze. Every Georgian citizen, he adds, would get an allowance of what they are calling, no surprise, “pinecoin.”
He sees longer-term political benefits too, helping the party build a new constituency of libertarian-minded supporters.
Japaridze says they have had discussions with an outside technology company he won’t name about the mechanics of creating a pinecoin cryptocurrency. He envisions a day when there will be no central banks, and property deeds worldwide will be stored on a giant blockchain database with no government or other entity having control. That, he claims, will both give owners greater protection from attempts to disenfranchise them, as well as boost overall transparency: “I should be able to look up who owns a piece of land in Bogotá, Colombia,” he says.
Cryptocurrency mining rigs operate at the Golden Fleece company in Kutaisi, Georgia. The company uses a cargo container with Chinese-built computers inside a dilapidated Soviet-era tractor factory to extract cryptocurrencies using low-cost electricity generated by water flowing from the nearby Caucasus Mountains.
Daro Sulakauri/Bloomberg via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Daro Sulakauri/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Cryptocurrency mining rigs operate at the Golden Fleece company in Kutaisi, Georgia. The company uses a cargo container with Chinese-built computers inside a dilapidated Soviet-era tractor factory to extract cryptocurrencies using low-cost electricity generated by water flowing from the nearby Caucasus Mountains.
Daro Sulakauri/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Girchi believes it is the first party to raise funds via cryptocurrency mining. When supporters log on to its website, they are given the choice of allowing their computer processors to be used to mine Monero, a newer virtual coin being marketed for its extreme anonymity. One of Japaridze’s team came up with the idea. And when he attended a recent global conference of like-minded political groups, he says delegates there told him it was the first time any party had tried to raise funds this way. It has only raised a few hundred dollarsso far, he says, but “it has also helped boost our reputation for innovation with younger voters.”
Such ideas are “just the beginning,” says Luka Kobalia, co-founder of a Tbilisi-based company called Blockmentor, which provides training for businesses seeking to use blockchain technology in their operations. Everything about the way the economy functions is going to change, he says.
Facebook groups now regularly advertise conferences and gatherings to share ideas, addressed by people who call themselves “blockchain evangelists.” Recent events have been standing room only, with people actually listening to the speakers and not looking at their phones.
Georgia’s finance sector has been sitting on the fence over cryptocurrencies, but some institutions are already invested. The country’s Liberty Bank now offers a means of buying and selling the best-known cryptocurrencies via its eMoney service. But it is still a long way from the point where this virtual money replaces so-called fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, or Georgia’s lari.
Crypto exchange
Like the original Klondike, Georgia’s digital gold rush has attracted some colorful characters hoping to make their fortune.
Take Andrew Thornhill, an energetic financial entrepreneur from Chicago and founder of a cryptocurrency startup called Spotcoin. He first came to Georgia a decade ago to provide Internet-banking advice. In 2011, he was briefly imprisoned for fraud, but he says his conviction does not restrict him from running a financial business either there or in Georgia. “It’s an unfortunate episode in my past, but I’m not trying to hide it,” Thornhill told NPR, adding that his main backers and colleagues are fully aware of what happened.
Now Spotcoin is issuing its own cryptocurrency and setting up an online exchange to make it easier to buy and sell other virtual currencies. “There is nothing like this in the world yet,” he claims.
Concerns that cryptocurrencies are being used as a money-laundering vehicle have been overdone, Thornhill says when we meet at Spotcoin’s Tbilisi headquarters. “Criminals are using dollars and euros every day, but we don’t blame the currencies,” he says. And blockchain technology has the potential to make financial transactions far more secure, he maintains. But the world’s central banks are right to proceed cautiously, Thornhill adds: “Everyone wants some rules. I’m a digital revolutionary, not a digital anarchist.”
Bit of a bubble?
While some people outside Georgia may have become multimillionaires thanks to the bitcoins processed inside the huge Tbilisi data center, just down the road is Gldani, one of the city’s poorest suburbs. The main street is lined with pawn shops and discount stores. Unemployment is high and many live on far less than the national average wage of $400 a month. It’s a similar story in many rural areas.
Against this economic backdrop, according to professor Tutberidze, it’s not surprising so many Georgians have dived into the cryptocurrency craze, hoping for quick wealth. But he warns a “mass psychology” has developed, with people buying in as prices rise but then panicking and selling again as they fall. He sees it as one of several alarm bells that this could become a dangerous bubble for Georgia.
Many people are spending savings or taking out loans to buy their own mining setups. Such is the demand, a secondary online market has sprung up for mining cards. But it’s not hard to find stories of people who have overreached and overpaid, with little chance of ever recouping their investment.
Meanwhile, shadowy lenders have been putting ads on Georgian Faceboook pages offering $10,000 to buy bitcoin or mining equipment — with interest rates starting at 18 percent.
Kobalia, the training company co-founder, acknowledges there are dangers. “Too many people think you just plug in and make money,” he says.
Tutberidze has tried to warn Georgians off it. “Friends keep coming to me, asking what I think about investing in bitcoin or other currencies,” the professor says. “They sound disappointed when I tell them, ‘Don’t.’ “
But the risks are part of the attraction of having left the Soviet planned economy behind, according to Bitfury’s lawyer Urumashvili. “This is a free country now,” he says.
Back in Telavi, Buzhaidze says even though his profits are down, he is sticking with it. “I don’t 100 percent understand how it works,” he says. “But I think it’s the future.”
Andrew North (@NorthAndrew) is a journalist based in Tbilisi, Georgia, and a former BBC correspondent in the Middle East and South Asia.
Wells Fargo reportedly will pay $1 billion fine for loan abuses
https://ift.tt/2J86Tua
Wells Fargo & Co is close to settling a record fine of $1 billion imposed by two U.S. regulators for its risk management business, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Thursday.
Last week, the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) proposed Wells Fargo to pay the penalty to resolve probes into auto insurance and mortgage lending abuses at the third-largest U.S. bank. Wells has acknowledged that it charged customers for excessive auto insurance, a burdensome expense that caused some to see their cars repossessed after defaulting on loans.
Wells Fargo declined to comment on the reported settlement.
The CFPB had been readying sanctions alongside the OCC, Wells Fargo’s day-to-day regulator.
The bank, still smarting from a prolonged scandal in which bank employees created millions of fake bank accounts in customers’ names, found inconsistencies at its auto lending and mortgage in summer 2017, leading to further probes by regulators.
To appease investors and regulators, the bank overhauled its operational structure, shook up its board and hired a new compliance officer.
Skynet is Coming: Two Robots Team Up to Build IKEA Chair [Video]
https://ift.tt/2Hwca1o
Scientists have demonstrated two robots using human-like dexterity to construct an Ikea chair. Components of the chair were randomly scattered in front of the robots, who were able to identify the correct parts and detect force to understand when, for example, pins were fully inserted into their holes, all while managing to move without obstructing one another.
From planning to execution, the robots only took 20 minutes to build the chair, with the construction itself only taking 8 minutes, 55 seconds to complete. Scary.
Doctors tried to lower $148K cancer drug cost; makers triple price of pill
https://ift.tt/2HgglyU
A drug that treats a variety of white blood cell cancers typically costs about $148,000 a year, and doctors can customize and quickly adjust doses by adjusting how many small-dose pills of it patients should take each day—generally up to four pills. At least, that was the case until now.
Last year, doctors presented results from a small pilot trial hinting that smaller doses could work just as well as the larger dose—dropping patients down from three pills a day to just one. Taking just one pill a day could dramatically reduce costs to around $50,000 a year. And it could lessen unpleasant side-effects, such as diarrhea, muscle and bone pain, and tiredness. But just as doctors were gearing up for more trials on the lower dosages, the makers of the drug revealed plans that torpedoed the doctors’ efforts: they were tripling the price of the drug and changing pill dosages.
The drug, ibrutinib (brand name Imbruvica), typically came in 140 mg capsules, of which patients took doses from 140 mg per day to 560 mg per day depending on their cancer and individual medical situation. (There were also 70 mg capsules for patients taking certain treatment combinations or having liver complications.) The pills treat a variety of cancers involving a type of white blood cell called B cells. The cancers include mantle cell lymphoma, which was approved for treatment with four 140 mg pills per day, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, approved to be treated with three 140 mg pills per day. Each 140 mg pill costs somewhere around $133—for now.
Imbruvica’s makers, Janssen and Pharmacyclics, have now gotten approval to sell four different tablets of varying strengths: 140 mg, 280 mg, 420 mg, and 560 mg. But the new pills will all be the same price—around $400 each—even the 140 mg dose pill. The makers will stop selling the old, cheaper 140 mg pill within three months, according to a report by the Washington Post.
The plan nixes any chance to lower costs with lower dosages. Even if patients can drop down to just 140 mg a day, they’ll pay three-times what they pay now for each 140 mg pill.
“Kind of pissed off”
In a statement to the Post, Janssen and Pharmacyclics explained the move saying the new line-up is “a new innovation to provide patients with a convenient one pill, once-a-day dosing regimen and improved packaging, with the intent to improve adherence to this important therapy.” They noted that those taking 560 mg a day will save money with the new pricing.
But doctors balked at what they saw as an underhanded move. In an interview with the Post, oncologist Mark Ratain of the University of Chicago Medicine, put things bluntly: “That got us kind of pissed off.”
Ratain and colleagues wrote a commentary in the weekly newsletter Cancer Letters this month, decrying the price hike and new pill series, calling it “highly unusual.” In addition to thwarting efforts to help lower treatment costs, the doctors pointed out that the new dosage line-up will make it harder to nimbly adjust patients’ doses by simply advising them to take different numbers of pills each day. Switching a patient from a 280 mg or 420 mg per day dose down to 140 mg will require paper work, filling a new prescription, and having patients return unused pills—a process that can drag out for weeks. And upping a patient’s dose would either be just as lengthy of a process or risk multiplying their treatment costs even further by doubling or tripling the pills each day.
In their commentary, titled in part “Sales Revenues at the Potential Expense of Patient Safety,” the doctors lay out examples of when quick dosage changes would be necessary. Those include when a patient needs to drop down while they’re on a short course of antibiotics or to adjust for new combination-cancer treatments. “Any putative convenience advantage of taking one pill a day is negated by the marked inconvenience to the patient of having to return pills every time there is a need for a dosage change,” they write.
Ratain and colleagues end with a call to the Food and Drug Administration to look into the matter, “given that it creates a barrier to optimal prescribing for some patients,” they write. “We further urge the FDA to recognize that the combination of the high price per pill and the flat pricing scheme are specific impediments to safe administration, and that ignoring the marketing approach for ibrutinib is antithetical to fostering optimally safe dosing and administration.”
Fake ad blockers in the Chrome store had over 20 million installs
https://ift.tt/2J4x7xK
gustavofrazao via Getty Images
If you can’t find that ad blocker you recently installed from the Chrome Web Store, you might want to do some browser spring cleaning. Google has killed five top-ranking ad blockers after AdGuard published a report revealing they’re fake extensions with extra code that harvest info on the websites you visit. They apparently send the data they collect to remote servers in order to manipulate Chrome’s behavior. “Basically, this is a botnet composed of browsers infected with the fake adblock extensions,” AdGuard wrote in its report. “The browser will do whatever the command center server owner orders it to do.”
Fake ad blockers have been fooling people since at least 2017 — last year, 37,000 people installed a fake AdBlock Plus created by what SwiftOnSecurity called a “fraudulent developer who clones popular name and spams keywords.” Like that AdBlock Plus impostor, the ones AdGuard discovered also spammed keywords to get to the top of the search results. Their creators simply ripped off legit extensions and added a few lines of malicious code hidden inside benign-looking images — they didn’t even bother thinking of creative names for their fake products.
Apparently, people don’t care if an extension’s name is something lazy and generic like “AdRemover” and will download it, so long as it’s somewhere near the top. According to AdGuard, the fake ad blockers managed to trick over 20 million users into installing them. So, how can you avoid fake extensions going forward? AdGuard says the best way to protect yourself is to check an extension’s author and making sure that it’s a company you can trust.