Facebook will stream The Oscars red carpet this weekend

Facebook will stream The Oscars red carpet this weekend

http://ift.tt/2CRMupN

The Academy Awards take place this Sunday and if you’re an Oscar fan who can’t get enough behind-the-scenes looks, Facebook has you covered. As Variety reports, Facebook will once again be the only social network to live-stream "The Oscars: All Access," which includes red carpet and backstage views as well as interviews with presenters, nominees and performers. The show will begin at 6:30 PM Eastern/3:30 PM Pacific and will stream on the Facebook pages of both ABC and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. You can also catch it on Oscar.com and ABCNews.com.

Sofia Carson (Pretty Little Liars: The Perfectionists, Descendants), Wesam Keesh (For the People, Awkward.) and commentators Chris Connelly, Ben Lyons and Adnan Virk will host "The Oscars: All Access." You can also check out more coverage over on Instagram where Tom Holland (Avengers: Infinity War, Spider-Man: Homecoming) will be taking over Stories on Instagram’s official account and the Academy will share content via Stories and Instagram Live.

Facebook has done this before. It played host to "The Oscars: All Access" last year as well and streamed content during the Emmy Awards in September. Following last year’s Academy Awards, Facebook said Oscar-related videos on its site garnered over 112 million views.

The Academy Awards air this Sunday at 8 PM Eastern/5 PM Pacific on ABC.

Via: Variety

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

March 1, 2018 at 07:09PM

Amazon faces criticism for being ‘complicit’ with counterfeiters

Amazon faces criticism for being ‘complicit’ with counterfeiters

http://ift.tt/2HZGsqz

Amazon pledged to tackle counterfeiting in 2017, but its lax policies are still hurting inventors and small companies, one supplier says. In a blog post, Elevation Lab founder Casey Hopkins wrote that a Chinese manufacturer ripped off its popular under-desk headphone stand, "The Anchor" and is selling it cheap on Amazon and taking all its sales. Worse, he claims that Amazon is effectively abetting such counterfeiters and could do away with it via a simple change.

According to Hopkins, the counterfeit seller "literally reverse engineered it, made steel compression molds, made the logo wrong, used fake 3M adhesive that’s very thin and was die-cut smaller than the top, they used a lower durometer silicone so it flexes more, it has huge mold parting lines, and the packaging is literally photocopied then reprinted (you can tell by the lack of image contrast)."

The result, he says, is that "customers are unknowingly buying crap versions of the product, while both Amazon and the scammers are profiting, and the reputation you’ve built goes down the toilet." It’s particularly onerous for small businesses, because new sellers pop up constantly and it can take Amazon precious days to remove them.

Customers are unknowingly buying crap versions of the product, while both Amazon and the scammers are profiting, and the reputation you’ve built goes down the toilet.

And yet the fix is simple, Hopkins says. To stop counterfeiting, Amazon established a registry of approved sellers in 2016, aka the "Brand Registry." All it has to do to help small inventors is add a check box for suppliers that only sell directly to Amazon and don’t use wholesalers. "Anyone else would have have to get approval or high vetting to sell the product," Hopkins said. On top of that, Amazon needs to increase its Brand Registry team so it can swat away counterfeit scammers more quickly, he believes.

Amazon has been regularly criticized for being too lax on counterfeiters, a problem that has kept the fashion world well away from the site, for instance. Chanel recently won a judgement against counterfeiters, but only after it persisted following a court setback. Smaller companies, though, are ill-equipped to take on expensive lawsuits.

The feds might soon wade into the fray, however. The US Government Accountability Office recently completed an investigation and was able to purchase 47 counterfeit products from Amazon, Walmart and other companies. Senator Orrin Hatch plans to convene a Senate hearing on the issue.

Source: Elevation Lab

Tech

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

March 2, 2018 at 08:21AM

This Exosuit Learns How You Walk To Give You A Boost

This Exosuit Learns How You Walk To Give You A Boost

http://ift.tt/2GTyLRv

Exosuits may seem the stuff of anime and superhero movies, but the technology is actually used for assisting those who might need a boost to go about their daily lives.
These wearable technologies fit onto the body, usually the legs, much like a high-tech wetsuit. The exosuit is designed to provide supportive force to various points of the leg when needed, helping the user walk more easily and naturally.
Now, new research out of Harvard University published in Science Robotics shows th

Tech

via Discover Main Feed http://ift.tt/1dqgCKa

March 1, 2018 at 01:47PM

Accelerating clinical research through mobile technology

Accelerating clinical research through mobile technology

http://ift.tt/2t8GKYV

Researchers face a number of challenges when conducting a clinical study.1 Investigators spend considerable time and money recruiting and screening viable participants. If recruitment takes too long, important studies can get scrapped before they are even started. Once a study is underway, participants must sacrifice their own time to make clinic visits, which, for long-term studies, can reduce participant retention. Incorporating internet and mobile technologies into a study’s design can re

Tech

via Discover Main Feed http://ift.tt/1dqgCKa

March 1, 2018 at 06:04PM

NPR Poll: After Parkland, Number of Americans Who Want Gun Restrictions Grows

NPR Poll: After Parkland, Number of Americans Who Want Gun Restrictions Grows

http://ift.tt/2oKBipB

Vince Warner fires an AK-47 with a bump stock installed at Good Guys Gun and Range in Utah. A significant majority of Americans favor outlawing the attachment, according to the latest NPR/Ipsos poll.

George Frey/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

George Frey/Getty Images

Vince Warner fires an AK-47 with a bump stock installed at Good Guys Gun and Range in Utah. A significant majority of Americans favor outlawing the attachment, according to the latest NPR/Ipsos poll.

George Frey/Getty Images

An increasing number of Americans, both Republicans and Democrats, want more gun regulation, according to a new NPR/Ipsos poll that surveyed people in the aftermath of the Parkland school shooting.

Three-quarters of people polled said gun laws should be stricter than they are today. That’s an increase — in a short period of time — from October 2017, when NPR conducted a similar survey in the wake of the Las Vegas shooting. Then, 68 percent said gun laws should be stricter than they were.

The poll also found widespread bipartisan support for a range of gun-control policies, including:

  • requiring background checks for all gun buyers (94 percent),
  • adding people with mental illnesses to the federal gun background check system (92 percent),
  • raising the legal age to purchase guns from 18 to 21 (82 percent),
  • banning bump stocks (81 percent),
  • banning high-capacity ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds (73 percent) and
  • banning assault-style weapons (72 percent).

The only policy intended to curb gun violence that is opposed by a majority of Americans (59 percent) is the one most frequently touted by President Trump — the idea of training teachers to carry guns in schools.

The poll also found that while nearly every gun policy was supported by a majority of both Republicans and Democrats, the one exception was arming teachers.

There was a clear-cut partisan gulf — 68 percent of Republicans favored the idea of training teachers to carry guns compared to just 18 percent of Democrats. Arming teachers was by far the most polarizing policy suggestion; the poll found a 50-point divide between Republicans and Democrats.

Trump’s in sync with his base

The president’s outspoken criticism of schools as gun-free zones and his recent rhetoric calling for a comprehensive gun bill suggests he’s acutely aware of how his base voters feel about gun policies — and the growing desire, even among Republicans, for some sort of stricter gun-control legislation.

“We see in this study, a majority of Republicans saying that they are supportive of a variety of different gun-control measures, many of which Trump mentioned explicitly in his [White House] briefing,” said Chris Jackson, director of the public polling team at Ipsos. “And that’s in contrast to a lot of Republican elected officials, who have taken a much more Second Amendment absolutist stance.”

Although Trump remains friendly with the National Rifle Association and its leadership, he’s recently shown a willingness to challenge GOP orthodoxy on guns.

In a televised White House meeting with legislators Wednesday, Trump surprised (and angered) many of his fellow conservative lawmakers with his ad-hoc approach to gun-control policy. He questioned his fellow Republicans’ relationship with the NRA and dismissed a concealed carry provision that conservatives wanted as a trade-off for some restrictions.

“They have great power over you people. They have less power over me,” Trump told GOP lawmakers at that meeting, adding, “Some of you people are petrified of the NRA. You can’t be petrified.”

Trump suggested he was open to expanding background checks and possibly raising the age to purchase an AR-15. (Both popular measures, according to the NPR/Ipsos poll).

“President Trump is actually closer to where the Republican base is on the issue of guns than a lot of Republican elected officials,” Jackson said. “And I think this is something that Trump has done a lot through his political career; he often times finds himself closer to the Republican base than the establishment does.”

Of course, the president has a history of adopting popular opinions and speaking to the polls, and then subsequently reversing his position and reverting to a more traditionally conservative attitude, as he did with his initial support for a bill that would protect DACA recipients from deportation.

Americans want Congress to act

Any hope for a quick legislative answer to the gun debate fell apart in the Senate Thursday. And although the Senate now has no plans to vote on gun legislation in the near future, the NPR/Ipsos poll finds that a majority of Americans (78 percent) say Congress needs to do more to address gun violence.

But the intensity for congressional action lies with the Democrats — 93 percent of whom want more action, compared to 68 percent among Republicans.

Jackson said the biggest change he’s noticed since the October survey is the overall importance people are giving to the gun debate. Crime/gun violence is now the No. 1 issue worrying Americans. (Last October, it was terrorism).

The shift since last fall is largely because more Democrats and independents say they’re concerned about guns, but Republicans shifted some as well.

And the poll found Americans are currently saying guns will be an important factor in their vote this November. Roughly two-thirds, or 63 percent, said so.

Traditionally, gun control is one of those issues that’s dominated by a small slice of the electorate — an energized group of committed gun-rights activists.

But the political winds may be shifting.

“This data indicates there’s actually an increasing energy on the side of gun control,” Jackson said. And “given that guns have become very partisan, that may have really significant results in the midterms.”

And there are signs the NRA’s influence among voters may be declining. The NPR survey shows a decreasing number of Americans overall (led by a shift in Democrats’ attitudes) said the NRA represents their views — just 36 percent overall down from 43 percent in October.

Guns are still partisan

There are still some major disagreements along party lines that reflect the overall gun debate in the country.

On the question of whether the country would be safer if more people carried guns, there was a huge divide, for example — 55 percent of Republicans felt the country would be safer, compared to just 15 percent of Democrats.

And likewise, when people were asked whether they believed the premise that the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun — there was a split along partisan lines — 71 percent of Republicans agreed, compared to 24 percent of Democrats.

The split over Trump’s handling of the Parkland shooting situation seems to mirror his overall approval rating and shows how much partisanship affects people’s perspectives — 71 percent of Republicans approved of how the president handled the aftermath of the school shooting, compared to just 9 percent of Democrats.


The poll was conducted from Feb. 27-28 with a survey sample of 1,005 adults across the country, chosen randomly from Ipsos’s online panel. They were interviewed in English, and the sample includes 351 Democrats, 341 Republicans and 203 independents. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

News

via NPR Topics: News http://ift.tt/2m0CM10

March 2, 2018 at 04:08AM

Equifax Reveals 2.4 Million Consumers Had Additional Info Stolen in 2017 Breach

Equifax Reveals 2.4 Million Consumers Had Additional Info Stolen in 2017 Breach

http://ift.tt/2oIyWHS

Interim Equifax CEO Paulino do Rego Barros, Jr. on on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2017. Photo: AP

Equifax announced new details on Thursday regarding the personal consumer data stolen during its disastrous data breach last year.

Previously undisclosed, the credit reporting agency said it had now identified approximately 2.4 million US consumers whose names and driver’s license information were stolen. In the “vast majority of cases,” the company said, the driver’s license numbers were not combined with additional pertinent information, such as home addresses, home states, or the licenses’ expiration dates.

Equifax said it had not previously reported the stolen records because its forensic investigation was focused predominantly on the theft of Social Security Numbers. The affected customers will be notified by the company directly, the company said.

“We continue to take broad measures to identify, inform, and protect consumers who may have been affected by this cyberattack,” Equifax interim CEO Paulino do Rego Barros, Jr., said in a statement.

The Equifax breach, first reported in September 2017, is widely considered the largest breach of consumer data in US history. Roughly 148 million Americans were impacted.

Earlier this week, a prominent US lawmaker accused Equifax of profiting off the breach. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, told Marketplace that Americans who’ve decided not to business with Equifax may still be paying the company when they sign up for outside credit-protection services.

“Equifax may actually make money off this breach because it sells all these credit-protection devices, and even consumers who say, ‘Hey, I’m never doing business with Equifax again’—well, good for you, but you go buy credit protection from someone else, they very well may be using Equifax to do the back office part,” said Warren, author of legislation co-sponsored by Sen. Mark Warner aimed at holding credit reporting agencies financial liable for breaches involving sensitive consumer data.

Tech

via Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com

March 1, 2018 at 11:39AM

Putin Nukes Florida in New Animated Video Showing Russia’s Futuristic Weapons

Putin Nukes Florida in New Animated Video Showing Russia’s Futuristic Weapons

http://ift.tt/2F5ILH5

Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered his annual address to the country’s Federal Assembly today, showing off some impressive new weapons in the process. One of the concept videos even showed a nuclear strike using multiple warheads against the United States. The video depicts Florida, to be exact—the site of President Trump’s private club in Palm Beach.

“Any use of nuclear weapons against Russia or its allies, any kind of attack, will be regarded as a nuclear attack against Russia and in response we will take action instantaneously no matter what the consequences are,” Putin said during the address. “Nobody should have any doubt about that.”

The editor-in-chief of the Kremlin backed RT news outlet tweeted “Elon Musk my ass” in response to the new strategic nuclear weapons, poking fun at America’s obsession with private space companies like Space X.

The Assembly broke into applause during the segment above when the video showed that Russia’s new rocket could hit any target on the globe.

“With the new system, there is no limitation,” said Putin. “As you can see from this video, it can attack any target through the North Pole or via the South Pole. No missile defense system will be able to withstand it.”

And while the part of the video showing Florida was relatively brief, it wasn’t subtle. If you had any doubt that it’s showing Florida, take a look at this Google Maps image side-by-side with Russia’s attack video.

Graphic: Left: Screenshot of a new animated video from Russia, Right: Map of Florida

“But this isn’t the end. We’ve developed new strategic weapons that don’t use ballistic trajectory at all, which means that missile defense will be useless against it,” Putin bragged.

Putin admitted that they don’t have any names for the new system in the animation and got a chuckle from the audience when he asked for the members of the audience to submit proposals to the Defense Ministry’s website.

The new weapon uses a “nuclear power energy unit,” according to Putin. “This is how it avoids defense barriers,” Putin explained as the video played.

“It has unlimited range, so it can keep going like this forever. As you understand, this is unheard of and no one has this system in the world. They may come up with something like this in the future, but by that time our guys will come up with some new ideas as well,” Putin said.

Putin also bragged about the noiseless “unmanned submarines” that can reach incredible depths that are “just fantastic.” The Russian president was sure to note that these were also capable of carrying nuclear weapons, though it’s unclear if the country has ever actually placed a nuke on a submarine without any humans aboard. All we know for sure right now is that their animators are working overtime.

Aside from weapons, Putin’s speech was heavy on romanticizing the glory days of the Soviet Union. Or at least romanticizing the resources that were at the nation’s disposal before its collapse.

“Russia lost 23.8 percent of its territory, 48.5 percent of its population, 41 percent of GDP, 39.4 percent of its industrial potential, 44.6 percent of the defensive capabilities,” Putin explained.

“It was a big question whether we’d be able to develop strategic weapons at all. Some even asked whether if Russia was capable of servicing nuclear weapons we inherited from the Soviet Union,” said Putin.

Putin said that the new weapons were developed in direct response to the US withdrawing from the ABM Treaty in 2002.

“In 2000, the US told us about its plans to withdraw from the ABM Treaty. Russia objected to this categorically. We believed that the treaty, the 1972 treaty, was the cornerstone, the international security architecture,” Putin said.

The full video of the presentation with English translation is on RT’s YouTube channel. Putin’s discussion of the military and defense begins at the 1 hour and 15 minute mark.

“We made no secret of our plans. We spoke openly of what we wanted to do,” Putin said about the new developments in nuclear technology.

“We wanted to motivate our counterparts—this was in 2004. Despite all of the difficulties we faced over the years, economic and financial problems, problems with our defense industry, with our armed forces, Russia remained a nuclear power, but nobody wanted to talk to us seriously,” Putin said. 

“They kept ignoring us. Nobody listened to us. So, listen to us now,” he said to rapturous applause.

If you had any doubts that the New Cold War was upon us, you can stop doubting.

[RT and NBC News]

Tech

via Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com

March 1, 2018 at 07:15AM