Facebook exposed 126 million Americans to Russia-linked pages

Russian attempts to skew the 2016 US election through Facebook reached much, much further than first thought. Numerous publications (including Axios, NBC News and the New York Times) have obtained Facebook’s prepared testimony for the Senate, which reveals that Russia-linked pages reached 126 million American users between January 2015 and August 2017. That’s over half of the social network’s US base, for those keeping track. About 80,000 pieces of divisive material were shown to 29 million users whose likes, shares and follows spread the content to many more people.

There’s more beyond that. Facebook also deleted over 170 Russia-linked Instagram accounts that had made about 120,000 posts, and it had discovered security threats against politicians that stemmed from APT28, the hacking team regularly connected to Russian military intelligence.

Facebook was quick to downplay the volume of Russian posts in its testimony. There were over 11 trillion total posts from Pages on Facebook between 2015 and 2017, the company said. And it’s true that merely seeing a post doesn’t mean you notice it, let alone that you believe what it says. However, that doesn’t change that a significant portion of those 126 million people interacted with those posts. That’s millions of people who unwittingly played a part in what appears to be a massive Russian disinformation campaign.

The company certainly isn’t alone when Google and Twitter have also found evidence of meddling. This is a broader problem with how underprepared internet companies were to deal with such a broad attempt to influence the American public. However, Facebook doesn’t look good in light of this testimony: it had initially claimed that its content didn’t influence the election at all, and now it’s admitting that Russian operators were wildly successful in sowing chaos (even if only some people fell for the ploy). The company’s rush to fix its ad system before the 2018 mid-terms just took on an added sense of urgency.

Update: Ahead of the upcoming testimony, Google detailed many of its findings in a blog post with associated PDFs.

We ​found ​18 ​channels ​likely ​associated ​with ​this ​campaign ​that ​made ​videos ​publicly ​available, ​in English ​and ​with ​content ​that ​appeared ​to ​be ​political ​(These ​channels ​also ​posted ​non-political videos, ​e.g., ​personal ​travelogues).

  • There ​were ​1,108 ​such ​videos ​uploaded, ​representing ​43 ​hours ​of ​content ​and ​totaling ​309,000 U.S. ​views ​from ​June ​2015 ​to ​November ​2016. ​(Note: ​A ​single ​user ​may ​generate ​multiple ​views on ​a ​single ​video.)
  • These ​videos ​generally ​had ​very ​low ​view ​counts; ​only ​around ​3 ​percent ​had ​more ​than ​5,000 views.
  • These ​channels’ ​videos ​were ​not ​targeted ​to ​the ​U.S. ​or ​to ​any ​particular ​sector ​of ​the ​U.S. population.
  • We ​have ​suspended ​the ​channels ​we ​identified.
  • Some ​have ​raised ​questions ​about ​the ​use ​of ​YouTube ​by ​RT, ​a ​media ​service ​funded ​by ​the Russian ​government. ​Our ​investigation ​found ​no ​evidence ​of ​manipulation ​of ​our ​platform ​or policy ​violations; ​RT—and ​all ​other ​state-sponsored ​media ​outlets— ​remains ​subject ​to ​our standard ​rules.

Source: Axios, NBC News, New York Times

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2z5J3O0
via IFTTT

Scientists can’t explain a ‘worrying’ rise in methane levels

The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere reached a record high in 2016, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Thanks to a combination of human activities and the El Nino weather event, last year’s increase was 50% higher than the yearly average from the past decade, driving CO2 to a level that’s not been seen for 800,000 years. Average levels in 2016 reached 403.3 parts per million, up from 400 parts per million in 2015.

The WMO’s report also points to a mysterious rise in the levels of methane in the atmosphere, which were also higher than the 10-year average. Speaking to BBC News, Professor Euan Nisbet from Royal Holloway University of London said this was not expected in the Paris Agreement. "We do not understand why methane is rising … It is very worrying."

Unsurprisingly, scientists say the figures make current climate targets unachievable. "Without rapid cuts in CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions, we will be heading for dangerous temperature increases by the end of this century, well above the target set by the Paris Climate Change Agreement," said WMO Secretary-General Petteri Taalas. "Future generations will inherit a much more inhospitable planet."

Via: BBC

Source: WMO

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2hqCED4
via IFTTT

Apple iPhone X, Day 1: The future is surprisingly familiar

Look back at Apple’s decade of iPhones and you’ll see that, minor plastic surgery aside, they all basically stick to the same design formula. Even the company’s relatively new, larger Plus phones kept faithful to the traditional iPhone look. Those days are numbered. The iPhone X officially launches this Friday, and I’m not being hyperbolic when I say it drastically redefines the iPhone as we know it. You’ll have to wait a little longer for our full review — we’ve only been testing the phone for about a day — but there’s already plenty to get into.

The iPhone X shares a several fundamentals with the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus. They all use Apple’s A11 Bionic chipsets, so performance seems the same, and they’re all available with either 64GB or 256GB of storage. The rounded rectangular design also remains, though this is where the X’s path starts to diverge.

As you’ve already heard, the classic home button is gone, and the space that it used to take up is now all screen. It’s the most radical visual change the iPhone line has ever seen, and I sort of love it. Aesthetics aside, the iPhone X feels fantastic, with a level of fit and finish that’s highly impressive even by Apple’s standards. I particularly like the phone’s stainless steel frame — it adds just the right amount of heft, and the glass covering the X’s front and back melts into it seamlessly. Just look at the screen: The 5.8-inch OLED panel stretches almost completely over the phone’s face, ensuring iOS dominates your interaction with the iPhone X.

That screen, by the way, is easily among the most impressive I’ve ever seen in a phone. Apple says it tuned for accuracy over sheer punchiness, and the effect is unmistakable. While the Galaxy Note 8 delivers much more vivid colors, the iPhone X is more subdued and natural. The question of which one is "better" is ultimately a subjective one. I’ve grown used to Samsung’s lurid screens, but the iPhone X definitely punches in the same weight class, even if it seems a little dimmer.

Chris Velazco/Engadget

Yes, a fine but noticeable bezel runs around the display, and yes, the notch above the screen that contains the elaborate camera cluster is a little strange. The latter is there for a reason, though: It packs a 7-megapixel front-facing camera, a speaker, the infrared camera and the dot projector that serves as the heart of the phone’s Face ID authentication system. The notch seemed like a clumsy design compromise at first, but after a few hours of using the phone, I naturally stopped paying attention to it. After all, most of the important stuff — especially in videos — tends to happen toward the middle of the screen.

Other than the notch, the rest of the phone sort of melts into the background. I’m told Apple wanted to build a device that made you feel like you’re holding software in the palm of your hand, and the X is a strong step in that direction. (Here’s hoping for smaller bezels next year, though.)

Chris Velazco/Engadget

The screen isn’t just pretty, it’s a little more than twice as tall as it is wide. And a surprising number of the apps I use regularly have adapted to fill that extra space just fine. Twitter, Foursquare, Facebook, Instagram, Amazon, Bear, Dark Sky, Yelp, WSJ… the list goes on. Apple says it generally takes a few hours of work to make an existing app fully iPhone X-compatible, and I sincerely hope that wasn’t just some marketing fluff because jumping into a non-optimized, letterboxed app was more jarring than I expected. When you fire up, say, Gmail, it’s bounded on the top and bottom by empty expanses that frankly make the X look a little silly. Not exactly the experience you’d expect out of a $1,000 iPhone, but I suspect the App Store will be full of updated software by the time the X is widely available.

So yeah, some app experiences are a little less than elegant right now. Thankfully, navigating through the iPhone X’s interface is generally a breeze. Since there’s no home button, cruising through iOS happens with a series of swiping gestures. Slide a finger across a bar at the bottom to switch between running apps, swipe up from the bottom of the screen and hold for a moment (you’ll feel a haptic pulse) to display all of your currently running apps, or simply swipe up to go back to the home screen. Despite hitting the reset button on almost a decade of iPhone behavior, Apple has built a version of iOS that handily proves home buttons aren’t necessary anymore.

That said, it’s not perfect. Using the new app switcher seems just a hair slower than double-tapping the home button, and trying to close an app takes a little more effort than it should. Instead of swiping up on an app window to dismiss it, you have to press and hold the window, then tap a close button on the corner. The move was necessary since the swipe up does something else, but the process now takes an extra, mildly annoying step. The stock iOS keyboard also has a lot of empty space beneath it, and while Apple uses it for buttons that switch layouts and fire up voice dictation, it’s pretty ugly.

In addition to all the stuff that’s baked into iOS 11, the iPhone X packs two features that people haven’t been able to stop talking about: Face ID and Animoji. In case you somehow haven’t heard: The former replaces the standard iPhone fingerprint sensor with a clever infrared camera array that basically turns your face into your password. The latter uses the same camera system to map your face’s movements to one of nine emojis so you can, y’know, make pandas say cuss words and send them to friends.

Chris Velazco/Engadget

Once my face was enrolled in Face ID — a process that took less than 20 seconds — unlocking the phone worked damn near perfectly every time. You still have to swipe up to view your home screen after you’ve unlocked the X with your mug, but the whole process is very nearly as fast as using a Touch ID sensor in a recent iPhone. Even better, Face ID works for verifying logins stored in your keychain, and every app I’ve tried that used Touch ID for identification now used my face without trouble. Since recent reports have called Face ID’s security into question, you’d better believe I’m going to spend this week trying to fool it.

And Animoji? Well, they exist, they work well, and they’re going to be unavoidable very soon. I don’t love having to say this, but I’ve accepted it: The age of talking poos is here. Oh, and fair warning: The longer you spend trying to see how those cutesy faces mirror your own, the warmer the phone gets. This theoretically shouldn’t be a problem after your initial curiosity wears off, but we’ll see how it goes.

(This, sadly, is a pretty good approximation of what my face actually does.)

Imaging-wise, the dual-camera around back is almost identical to the one in the iPhone 8 Plus. The only real difference is that the 12-megapixel telephoto camera has a wider aperture and optical image stabilization, so zoomed shots in the dark should look at least a little better. I didn’t get to test this very much, so you’ll have to have come back for the full review.

So far, what’s been most notable about the iPhone X isn’t how different it is from the models that came before it, but how soon all of the changes start to feel totally normal. Tim Cook has made clear that the X is the future of Apple’s smartphones, but the future doesn’t feel foreign at all — it feels surprisingly natural, surprisingly quickly.

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2hqrMoM
via IFTTT

Sprint, T-Mobile Merger is Apparently No Longer Happening

sprint tmobile merger

According to Nikkei and the Wall Street Journal, Sprint and T-Mobile are no longer negotiating and will likely soon call off steps towards a merger. That news comes as somewhat of a shock, as reports for weeks have suggested that the companies may announce a merger before the end of October. That idea seemed even more likely last week as each released Q3 earnings without live calls or fielding questions, leading many to believe that they would announce something within days.

Today’s reports say that SoftBank’s (Sprint’s parent company) board met over the weekend and decided that they weren’t willing to give up control of Sprint to Deutsche Telekom (T-Mobile’s parent), which had previously been the proposed arrangement. SoftBank could officially tell T-Mobile and Deutsche Telekom either today or tomorrow that the merger won’t happen.

No matter what you think of this news, it certainly means that the US wireless industry will continue to operate with the same four major players. Sprint will have to heavily invest in network going forward if they want to seriously compete, just like T-Mobile has been and continues to do. I don’t know that either will close in on Verizon or AT&T in the near future, but T-Mobile has shown that it has figured out how to add customers in a time where everyone else seems to be shedding them.

This sad news or did you not really care to begin with?

// Wall Street Journal | Nikkei

Sprint, T-Mobile Merger is Apparently No Longer Happening is a post from: Droid Life

from Droid Life: A Droid Community Blog http://ift.tt/2ziQgef
via IFTTT

Smart homes, cars may identify you from finger vibrations



No longer fingerprints! Scientists developed a low-cost security system that accurately senses finger vibrations to identify people and grants access to smart homes, cars or appliances.

The new system called VibWrite, allows user verification when the finger touches any solid surface.
 
The system integrates passcode, behavioural and physiological characteristics, which  were developed by researchers at Rutgers University.
 
System builds on a touch sensing technique by using vibration signals. According to Professor Yingying Chen from Rutgers University, “ Everyone’s finger bone structure in unique, and their fingers apply different pressures on surfaces, so sensors that detect subtle physiological and behavioural differences can identify and authenticate a person.”
 

 
He also added, “ Smart access systems that use fingerprinting and iris-recognition are very secure, but they are probably more than 10 times as expensive as our VibWrite system, especially when you want to widely deploy them.”
 
Researchers said, VibWrite allows users to choose from PINs, lock patterns or gestures to gain secure access.
 
VibWrite system is low-cost and uses minimal power.  It comes with an inexpensive vibration motor and receiver, and it can turn any solid surface into an authentication surface.
 

 
Developer says, it has easy hardware installation and maintenance, and “VibWrite” probably could be commercialized in couple of years.
 
According to a report, during two trials, VibWrite verified legitimate users with more than 95% accuracy and the false positive rate was less than 3%.
 
The new system needs improvements because at this time users may need a few attempts to pass the system.
 
The developer mentioned that they deploy multiple sensor pairs, refine the hardware and upgrade authentication algorithms.  Also it needs to be tested outdoors to account for varying temperatures and other climate conditions.  
 
Therefore VibWrite still is under development and more tests needs to be done before it could hit the market. 


“Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?… So why the f*** doesn’t it do that?” — Steve Jobs



from DailyTech News Feed http://ift.tt/2A0F7Mt
via IFTTT

GameStop Launches Unlimited Rental Plan: 6 Months for $60

GameStop is launching an unlimited rental service for physical used games. The $60 PowerPass gets you six months access to whatever games you can find in stores.

The program launches on November 19 and works in a simple enough fashion. You take home any used game from a GameStop store: this covers the entire “for sale” used game stock rather than being a special section. When you’re done playing, you return it and swap it for another. At the end of the six months, assuming you don’t renew, you can keep whichever game you currently have out.

You have to be signed up to GameStop’s PowerUp Rewards program to buy PowerPass, but it is available to people on the free tier. That requirement appears to be a way to build the admin of tracking who has which game without needing to create a new system just for PowerPass.

If gamers consider the deal worthwhile, it looks like a winner for GameStop as well. Because it involves used discs, the store will still be able to sell the game after it’s returned, without any loss in value. Each player only having one game out at a time shouldn’t mean a dramatic drop in stock levels.

Perhaps most importantly, it’s a good way to attract gamers into stores where they might buy other used games or even new ones.

The post GameStop Launches Unlimited Rental Plan: 6 Months for $60 appeared first on Geeks are Sexy Technology News.

from [Geeks Are Sexy] Technology News http://ift.tt/2zUGOdh
via IFTTT

First Guilty Plea In Russia Probe: Who Is George Papadopoulos?

George Papadopoulos, left, pleaded guilty earlier this month to lying to FBI agents about a series of meetings he took and planned while he was a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign.

Costas Bej/Courtesy of The National Herald


hide caption

toggle caption

Costas Bej/Courtesy of The National Herald

George Papadopoulos, left, pleaded guilty earlier this month to lying to FBI agents about a series of meetings he took and planned while he was a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign.

Costas Bej/Courtesy of The National Herald

Before George Papadopoulos became the first legal casualty of Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russia and the 2016 election, he was a 30-year-old energy lawyer best known in DC for getting name-dropped by Donald Trump and for reportedly embellishing his resume.

The Justice Department announced Monday that Papadopoulos pleaded guilty earlier this month to lying to FBI agents about a series of meetings he took and planned while he was a foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign.

The White House immediately sought to distance itself from Papadopoulos Monday, with press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders saying his role within the campaign was “extremely limited.” And that it was a “volunteer position.”

A former Trump campaign official said much of the same to Axios’s Jonathan Swan, shortly after the news broke.

“To be honest… I thought they were talking about George Gigicos (advance man on campaign) … not because he could’ve possibly been involved with Russia but because he’s the only guy with a Greek name that anyone knew on the campaign,” the official said.

That description of Papadopoulos, as a campaign nobody, doesn’t jibe with the picture painted by the court documents unsealed on Monday or with Trump’s own words.

In a Spring 2016 interview with the Washington Post editorial board, then-candidate Trump was asked about who was advising him on foreign policy. He began listing names, and listed Papadopoulos second, referring to him as an “energy and oil consultant, excellent guy.”

The documents show Papadopoulos in touch with multiple “high-ranking” campaign officials once he was brought on board, and that he met with a professor with Russian ties who had promised to provide “dirt” on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, as well as another “Russian national” woman.

Papadopoulos also appears in an Instagram photo from March 2016, posted by Trump, with the caption “Meeting with my national security team in #WashingtonDC.”

While Papadopoulos’s interactions on behalf of the campaign on their face don’t seem to have broken any laws, it was the fact that he allegedly lied about them to the FBI that got him into trouble. The charging documents say Papadopoulos mischaracterized the content and the timing of his interactions with both people mentioned.

It’s not the first time his honesty has come into question.

The Washington Post reported in April 2016 that it appeared Papadopoulos had fluffed up his resume. Here’s the Post‘s Karen DeYoung:

“George Papadopoulous, a 2009 graduate of DePaul University, has described himself in several lengthy published résumés as an oil and gas consultant and expert in eastern Mediterranean energy policy.

But his claim to have served for several years as a fellow at the Washington-based Hudson Institute was refuted by David Tell, Hudson senior fellow and director of public affairs, who said the institute’s ‘records indicate that Mr. Papadopoulos started here as an unpaid intern in 2011 and subsequently provided some contractual research assistance to one of our senior fellows.’

Papadopoulos also lists attendance as ‘U.S. Representative at the 2012 Geneva International Model United Nations.’ Two people who were part of the delegation that year, including Antony Papadopoulos (no relation), current secretary general of the Geneva program, said they had no recollection of him being there.

He also cites the delivery of a keynote address at the 2008 annual American Hellenic Institute Foundation Conference. The conference agenda that year noted Papadopoulos’s participation on a youth panel with other students; it lists 1988 Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis as the keynote speaker.”

When asked by the Post about the discrepancies, Papadopoulos replied:

“Is it true that the ‘establishment GOP foreign policy advisers,’ many of whom I’ve met, are confused why the presidential front runner chose a group of experts with regional, on the ground experience, with track records of getting deals done with governments, instead of relying on their failed policies they likely devised at Starbucks on Pennsylvania Ave? If so, I am very shocked.”

DePaul University professor Richard Farkas taught Papadopoulos less than a decade ago. He teaches classes in Russian politics and Russian foreign policy, and as NPR member station WBEZ’s Dave McKinney reports, Papadopoulos graduated from DePaul in 2009.

“I don’t recall him being an outstanding student,” said Farkas, who also described Papadopoulos as “zealous and a bit simple.”

Farkas added that he was skeptical Papadopoulos had any real high-level contacts in the Russian government.

“There’s no likelihood he could access it effectively. I think he probably was just embellishing,” said Farkas, who has taught at DePaul for more than 40 years. “I’ve been teaching about this part of the world and know people in Moscow. I don’t think I could access people at that level, not at least without really working it.”

More recently, Papadopoulos worked as the director of the Center for International Energy and Natural Resources Law & Security at the London Center of International Law Practice. NPR found a cache’d version of the institution’s website that listed Papadopoulos on a staff list as recently as April 14, 2016. He seemed to be wiped from the list by May of that year.

An inquiry to the institute about Papadopoulos’s employment status and history was not immediately returned Monday.

Over the past two years, Papadopoulos has also voiced his opinions on foreign policy in media reports, written by himself and others.

In an interview with the Jerusalem Post in April 2016, Papadopoulos said Trump viewed Russian President Vladimir Putin as a “responsible actor and potential partner.” He added that Trump could “ally” with Putin on combating radical and violent Islam in the Middle East.

Prior to joining the Trump camp, Papadopoulos also advised Republican Ben Carson’s campaign. He was laid off shortly after the Iowa caucuses, reports CBS, after working for Carson for about seven weeks.

from NPR Topics: News http://ift.tt/2iiu5tF
via IFTTT