Don’t Buy the Pixel 2 XL Until Google Sorts Out Its Display Problems

If you’re mulling the Pixel 2 XL for your next smartphone upgrade, you may want to think twice, or at least put your decision on hold for a few days. Early versions of the device could have a hardware flaw that causes permanent damage to the screen.

Since the Pixel 2 XL first launched last week, multiple people have reported cases of “burn-in.” That means the display may be permanently damaged in areas where a recurring image (like the Android navigation buttons) discolors the screen.

On Sunday, Google confirmed that it’s looking into issues surrounding the Pixel 2 XL display in a statement to The Verge:

The Pixel 2 XL screen has been designed with an advanced POLED technology, including QHD+ resolution, wide color gamut, and high contrast ratio for natural and beautiful colors and renderings. We put all of our products through extensive quality testing before launch and in the manufacturing of every unit. We are actively investigating this report.

What You Need to Know About Burn-In On the Pixel 2 XL Display

Burn-in isn’t that uncommon of an issue on modern displays, but it typically takes months or even years for even the faintest discoloration to show up. So the fact that people are already seeing it happen on the Pixel 2 XL definitely isn’t a good sign.

Here’s what burn-in looks like on the Pixel 2 XL, courtesy of Android Central executive editor Alex Dobie. (Look for the faint navigation icons at the bottom of what should be a plain gray screen.)

It’s possible the issue could actually be image retention, which would be an easier fix, but if burn-in is the culprit Google may need to replace a ton of devices or even recall the Pixel 2 XL entirely. For now, you should probably wait to see what the company uncovers, or just opt for the smaller Pixel 2 (which doesn’t seem to have any major issues) instead.

from Lifehacker http://ift.tt/2yJz7Jr
via IFTTT

Everybody Is Lying About How to Flatten Your Belly

Core exercises will build up your abs, but they do nothing for the layer of fat on top of them. Likewise, no leg exercise can give you slimmer thighs. And yet headlines and tweets about shrinking specific body parts abound—even when the articles themselves contradict the headline.

Article preview thumbnail

Many people believe you can “target” fat loss through certain exercises, such as crunches …

Read more Read

For example, this health.com article is headlined as a “10-Minute Love Handle Workout.” It begins by saying that a traditional ab workout won’t get rid of your love handles (true) so you need to target your oblique muscles specifically (uh, that’s no better). Then there is a brief moment of clarity:

That being said, it’s a myth that you can spot reduce fat loss. Yes, you can target your obliques to maximize toning, but fat is lost through cardio and diet. We’ve all heard that abs are made in the kitchen, and (unfortunately) it’s true. You can do crunches until the cows come home, but unless you get rid of your excess fat through healthy eating, your toned abs will never be seen. So here’s the best strategy for kicking your love handles to the curb:

The strategy has three steps. One is to diet, described in four words: “Eat lean. Eat clean.” Uh, thanks. The second is a mention that you should do some cardio. The third is the promised “love handle workout.” Of these three, only the first two can shrink your love handles. And yet the headline and bulk of the article are about the third item, which can’t.

Or take this shape.com article on the “Best Inner Thigh Exercises for Women.” They asked 16 trainers to “share their go-to move for slim, sculpted hips and thighs,” even though there is no move that can make your hips and thighs slimmer. (You can exercise a muscle to make it larger.) The first seven trainers dutifully offer exercises that strengthen the inner thighs. The eighth objects: “If you want to reduce the size of your thighs and look more toned, then your goal is really fat loss since you can’t spot reduce.”

But then he offers an exercise anyway, and so do all the rest.

I am sure the trainers, many of them impeccably qualified, understand the difference between losing fat (which happens all over) and strengthening a muscle (which you can target). Several of the others mentioned that they chose exercises that burn lots of calories, which seems like a nod to the truth. But then the article gets written anyway, and packaged with a headline that directly contradicts the facts on exercise physiology.

from Lifehacker http://ift.tt/2y16xVa
via IFTTT

Newegg.com Allegedly Involved in Ponzi Scheme, Suit Pending

A quartet of South Korean banks has filed a suit against Newegg, Inc., the company that operates popular computer parts eTailer Newegg.com reports the LA Times. The suit alleges that Newegg conspired with a South Korean hardware manufacturer to defraud the banks involved in the suit of hundreds of millions of dollars. The suit was filed in the US District Court in LA.

The suit alleges that Newegg and ASI Corp. made fraudulent orders of a large number of home-theater personal computers form Moneual, a Korean maker of computer hardware. Moneual is said to be the mastermind behind the scheme that saw the fraudulent orders used to secure financing from banks.

“Moneual then engaged in a classic Ponzi scheme,” said the complaint, which was filed by U.S. law firm Gibson Dunn on behalf of the Industrial Bank of Korea, Nonghyup Bank, Keb Hana Bank and Kookmin Bank.

The suit alleges that Moneual used the fraudulent orders from Newegg and ASI to seek and obtain more financing from the South Korean banks. According to the suit, both Newegg and ASI were given kickbacks for their participation in the scheme. The plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial and monetary damages in the suit. Moneual was the parent company of Zalman Tech Co. Ltd., which stopped trading stock in 2014 on allegations of fraud.

from Legit Reviews Hardware Articles http://ift.tt/2xZXX9e
via IFTTT

The Second Trailer for the Blue Planet Sequel Reminds Us the World Is Still Worth Protecting

We’ve got nine long days to wait until the sequel to the BBC’s spectacular 2001 nature documentary, Blue Planet, airs on October 29 in the UK. Fortunately, the BBC has blessed us with a second trailer for Planet Earth II, which looks like it will make even the most extravagant Hollywood blockbusters pale in comparison.

Article preview thumbnail

It’s been 16 years since the original Blue Planet debuted and crowned BBC Earth as the king of the…

Read more Read

As questionable decisions are made by governments around the world when it comes to ecology and protecting our natural environments, Planet Earth II will arrive just in time to remind us that the world is still a spectacular place, and we should be doing everything we can to help keep it that way.

[YouTube via Tastefully Offensive]

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2gwC7T5
via IFTTT

Drone Video of Border Wall Prototypes Accidentally Shows How Worthless the Wall Would Be

Construction of border wall prototypes by US Customs and Border Protection outside of San Diego, California (GIF made from US Customs and Border Protection video)

US Customs and Border Protection recently released video of President Trump’s border wall prototypes in San Diego. And we couldn’t help but notice something strange from the video. It shows a bird’s-eye view of the wall from the perspective of a drone. And the drone is much, much higher than the wall.

Do you see what I mean? This is supposed to be a wall that, in President Trump’s words, is going to stop “drugs from pouring into this country.” But the funny thing about a wall is that you can get over it pretty easily these days—especially as drones become more affordable. CBP’s own video proves just how easy it is to get over the damn thing.

Remember the American who was smuggling 13 pounds of meth at a time over the border this summer? He was doing it right near where the border wall prototypes are now being constructed outside San Diego. And President Trump’s proposed wall would do nothing to stop a situation like that. The only thing that does work in such cases is what already worked without the wall: agents spotting smugglers at the border.

When I asked CBP about that, they seemed to acknowledge that the wall obviously doesn’t do shit on its own.

“Matt, don’t forget that there are also agents, sensors, cameras and other technologies monitoring the Border Enforcement Zone,” Carlos Diaz, the Southwest Branch Chief for the CBP Office of Public Affairs, told Gizmodo by email. “The combination of those elements allow for the effective and efficient protection of the wall.”

Construction of border wall prototypes by US Customs and Border Protection outside of San Diego, California (GIF made from US Customs and Border Protection video)

The funny thing about Trump’s campaign promise to build a wall is that it’s not what CBP leadership has repeatedly asked for over the years. The agency wants more technology. Precisely the kind of technology that has been employed at the border for decades, like cameras and sensors. But that’s not what President Trump is delivering.

It’s estimated the Trump’s proposed US-Mexico border wall would cost anywhere from $15 billion on the low-end (according to Republicans like Mitch McConnell) and $70 billion on the high-end (according to Democratic Senator Kamala Harris). But no matter what the final cost, Mexico has already said that they won’t pay for it.

Whether the wall ultimately gets built or not, it’s safe to say that it’s not going to be stopping drugs from getting across the border. But at least it’ll be incredibly expensive and ugly. Great job, President Trump. We knew we could count on you.

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2zpKyUb
via IFTTT

My Brain Refuses to Believe These Domino Tricks Are Real

It’s certainly impressive when someone spends an entire week stacking dominoes, but watching them fall over for half an hour gets a little dull after the first few minutes. So domino masters Hevesh5 and Kaplamino teamed up to create a series of seemingly impossible domino tricks that are far more impressive than any Guinness World Record attempt.

Gravity is still the main power source for most of these tricks, but at other times a slight breeze or the subtle vibrations from a domino toppling to the floor is all that’s needed to keep a chain going. Hopefully this video inspires other domino stackers to stop chasing word records, and instead put more thought into their domino runs, because I could watch these for hours.

[YouTube via The Awesomer]

from Gizmodo http://ift.tt/2l7xdNT
via IFTTT

Dutch cyclists can ride over a 3D-printed bridge

A town called Gemert in the Netherlands just became home to the first 3D-printed cycling bridge ever. It took its creators at Eindhoven University three months and 800 layers to complete the 26-foot-long bridge, but now it’s open and ready to support hundreds of cyclists a day. The researchers had to develop a new 3D printing technique that uses steel reinforcement cables to create pre-stressed concrete. Once they were done laying out all its layers, they tested the bridge by placing a five-ton weight on top of it. Their efforts paid off: while they’ll surely improve the method even more, they believe they’re now capable of using the technique to build even bigger structures.

Printing out concrete has a number of advantages over typical techniques. To start with, it can form any shape, since it’s not limited by molds. Further, anything made using the method might be finished a lot quicker, since it doesn’t require the construction of formware structures to give shape to concrete. Finally, it’s much more environmentally friendly than typical methods, since it only deposits concrete where it’s needed and doesn’t waste cement. Since cement production is characterized by high carbon dioxide emissions due to the extreme heat it requires, reducing the amount of concrete needed will also reduce the CO2 generated per structure.

If the technique can be refined further to build just about anything we want more quickly, who wouldn’t want to use a method that can also help our planet? The researchers still have to create more experimental structures like this, though, and are in fact involved in the 3D printing of five houses that are actually going to be occupied.

Source: Eindhoven University of Technology

from Engadget http://ift.tt/2gCFyI0
via IFTTT