The best way to reheat pizza

https://www.popsci.com/story/diy/best-reheat-pizza/

Take a good look at it. It won't look half as good in the morning.

Take a good look at it. It won’t look half as good in the morning. (Brent Hofacker via Depositphotos/)

Order pizza, and there’s a good chance it’s gone within hours. Something about that round wheel of dough, melted cheese, warm tomato sauce, and seemingly countless topping possibilities is simply irresistible. If only pizza would stay that way forever.

Still, it’s hard to resist the temptation of a leftover slice as you rummage through the fridge for food the next day. Maybe you like cold pizza—there’s no shame in that—but if you’re looking to restore some of that fresh-pizza magic by reheating that ‘za, you’ll need to know what you’re doing.

So, Popular Science’s DIY team tracked down the most popular strategies, bought a whole lot of pizza, and put them to the test. We sought the ultimate method—The Way.

But first—decay, staling, and death

The very moment pizza is born out of the oven, it’s too hot to eat and might not even be done cooking. But right around 140 degrees Fahrenheit—the temperature experts recommend you dig in so you don’t burn your mouth—it begins its inevitable march toward complete decay, just like everything else on Earth.

If you can’t (or won’t) eat your pizza when it’s fresh, all you’ll be able to do later is damage control. You see, cheese only likes to be melted once, because when it does, it loses its integrity. When exposed to high temperatures, cheese loses fat and water, and there’s just no way to get it back.

“That water isn’t going up,” says bread and pizza expert Francisco Migoya, head chef at Modernist Cuisine. “The dough is like a sponge, so it’s just going to absorb it all, making it soggier and gummier as time goes by.”

At this point, the moisture from the sauce and water, plus the fat from the cheese (and any meat), starts seeping into the crust, creating what pizza connoisseurs know as “the gum line”—that layer between the sauce and crust that looks like raw dough. The thicker the pizza, the more pronounced the gum line will be, and the longer it sits there uneaten, the thicker it will get. This, Migoya says, changes the crust permanently.

You should never leave pizza out on the counter or in the oven overnight (because of bacteria), but putting it in the fridge doesn’t do it any favors. Low temperatures congeal everything the dough has absorbed and accelerate the staling process, or retrogradation. In short: The starch in the crust recrystallizes, and all that fresh-pizza chewiness goes out the window.

How we did it

PopSci is based in New York City, so we tested each method with the thin-crust style of pizza the Big Apple is famous for. If you’re reheating Chicago-style deep-dish pizza or another variety, your results may vary.

The slices we used (both plain cheese and topped with pepperoni) spent 12 to 48 hours in the fridge. Reheating frozen pizza is a whole other ballgame, and we can’t speak to that here.

Let the games begin.

Top tier ???

Reddit’s favorite

The light does not do justice to this amazing reheated slice of pizza, but there's a reason this is Reddit's favorite method.

The light does not do justice to this amazing reheated slice of pizza, but there’s a reason this is Reddit’s favorite method. (Sandra Gutierrez G./)

The official reheating method of the /r/pizza subreddit, this calls for placing your cold pizza on a non-stick pan and cooking it for two minutes over medium-low heat (or until the bottom of the slice is crispy). Then, pour two drops of water (less than a teaspoon) into the pan as far from the pizza as you can get. Cover the pan with a lid and turn the heat to low. Cook it for another minute.

The results

You may be tempted to try this with a cast-iron pan, but we found a standard non-stick pan worked best. The crust was crispy, the cheese (thanks to the steam from the water circulating under the lid) melted perfectly, and the slice was the perfect temperature to be eaten immediately.

Using a cast-iron pan, however, amplifies a number of factors you may not want to deal with while heating up a quick bite. Depending on your stove, it may take what feels like forever to warm the thick metal pan. And if it’s not properly seasoned, tossing a cold slice onto hot, dry iron is a recipe for burned crust (more on that later). Even if you get the pan hot with a thin sheen of oil, the crust will become extremely crispy before the cheese has much of a chance to melt.

Hot tray in a hot oven

Hot, and almost as good as new.

Hot, and almost as good as new. (John Kennedy/)

Put a baking tray in your oven and heat it to 450 degrees Fahrenheit. If you don’t want to clean the tray later, you can line it with foil. Once the oven has reached the proper temperature, use an oven mitt to take the hot tray out and put your slices on it. Place the tray on the middle rack and cook it for five minutes.

The results

We had to let the pizza sit for a minute or two to cool down before we could eat it, but when it passed between our lips, we experienced excellent crispiness, melty cheese, and a slice that was almost as good as new.

You can also play around with different temperatures, but you should always make sure the tray heats up with the oven. We tried it at 375 degrees for 10 minutes, and while the first bite was crispy and tasted great, the slice became hard to chew the closer we got to the end—more like a cracker, less like a pizza. The cheese on the plain slice was quite dehydrated, but the pepperoni one was fine—the fat in the meat likely helped keep the cheese moist. The crust on the pepperoni slice was better too: It was the right amount of crisp and wasn’t tough to chew as it got thicker.

Middle tier ??

Straight-up rebaking

If you use this method, put the pizza on foil. Putting it straight on the rack isn't worth risking a fire.

If you use this method, put the pizza on foil. Putting it straight on the rack isn’t worth risking a fire. (Sandra Gutierrez G. /)

This method suggested placing the pizza directly on your oven rack, but Migoya strongly advised against that. “There is no food I would put in an oven like that,” he says, appalled. “The risk of the cheese melting off is too great, and all that grease in a hot environment is the perfect recipe for a fire inside your oven. You don’t want that.”

We did it anyway. For science (with a sheet of aluminum foil on the rack below to catch any drippings and hopefully prevent a fire). But you definitely shouldn’t.

The results

The best iteration of this strategy was baking the pizza on a sheet of foil (not directly on the rack) at 450 degrees for five minutes. The crust was crispy, the cheese was warm—solid all around, but not as good as rebaking it on a hot tray. You can also do it at 350 degrees for 10 minutes for a slightly less-crispy slice, if that’s your thing. Our worst results with this method came when we put the pizza directly on the oven rack. We didn’t start a fire (we had a fire extinguisher on hand), but the crust was unevenly cooked due to the lack of a solid heated surface underneath.

The microwave + oven combo

Looks pretty sad, doesn't it? Putting it in the oven livened it up a bit, though.

Looks pretty sad, doesn’t it? Putting it in the oven livened it up a bit, though. (John Kennedy/)

We were pretty skeptical about this technique, but it surprised us. First, put the pizza in your microwave for 30 seconds. Then, put the pizza in a tray in a cold oven and set it to heat up to 350 degrees. Once the oven tells you it’s done preheating—when you’d normally put food in—take the pizza out.

The results

After its stint in the microwave, the pizza was super rubbery. Not a great start. We doubted the power of the oven could restore it to even a fraction of its original glory. But, it did. Baking the pizza crisped it up pretty well and removed some rubberiness. The thicker parts of the crust remained somewhat floppy, but it was adequate. Still, we’re not sure why anyone would pick this over tossing it on a hot tray that’s been in the oven, except that this method may be marginally faster. Not by much, though.

Low and slow in the oven

It's like a little bundle of cheesy joy waiting for you to enjoy it.

It’s like a little bundle of cheesy joy waiting for you to enjoy it. (Sandra Gutierrez G./)

Place cold pizza slices on a baking sheet and cover them tightly with aluminum foil. Place them on the lowest rack of your oven and set the temperature for 275 degrees. Let it bake for 25 to 30 minutes.

The results

The crust on the cheese slice was crispy, but the pepperoni slice turned out a little too chewy, probably because of the extra fat from the pepp. Aesthetically, neither of them looked too good: The cheese was soft, but it dried up pretty fast after coming out of the oven, and the sauce looked like one big scab. It’s also one of the most time-consuming methods we tested. When it comes to overall taste, though, it was still good.

The worst ?

A very hot pan

Blame the quality of this photo on the fact that the photographer was trying not to burn his apartment down.

Blame the quality of this photo on the fact that the photographer was trying not to burn his apartment down. (John Kennedy/)

Heat a pan on your stovetop over high heat for a couple minutes until it’s really hot. Add the pizza and reduce the temperature to medium-high. Cook for two or three minutes.

The results

We tried this method with both a porcelain non-stick pan and a cast-iron, but the results were equally underwhelming. The pizza in the non-stick had to come off the heat after only a minute and a half. The cheese was bubbling and the crust had burnt black and stuck to the pan. Cleaning was a nightmare. We don’t recommend.

Cast-iron was worse. In a dry pan, the crust began smoking the moment it hit hot metal. The smell of disastrously burned bread hung heavy in the air for hours. Somehow, the pizza was still cold on top. If Hell ever freezes over and we get the chance to taste it, this is probably what it would be like: scalding, burnt, and covered by a layer of cold, congealed fat.

We oiled the cast-iron to give this strategy a second chance and it didn’t start to burn immediately—that took about three minutes. The crust was better (maybe too crispy), but the cheese on top was still lukewarm at best.

Microwaved with a glass of water

Some people swear by this method. Some people just want to see the world burn.

Some people swear by this method. Some people just want to see the world burn. (Sandra Gutierrez G./)

Simply put your pizza in the microwave with a glass of water and heat them both up for a minute.

The results

No. Just—no. The pizza tasted like rubber, the exterior was too hot and the inside was still cold. Yes, the cheese didn’t look as disgusting as it does when you put the pizza in the microwave without a glass of water, but it’s still borderline inedible.

The microwave loop

This is just sad. And enraging, to be honest.

This is just sad. And enraging, to be honest. (Sandra Gutierrez G./)

Set your microwave to 30 or 40 percent power and heat the pizza for 45 seconds. Check it out and repeat as often as necessary.

The results

The crust was gummy—not crispy at all. The cheese melted but was highly dehydrated, so it didn’t have much taste and its consistency was rubbery at best. There was no difference between the cheese and pepperoni pizzas, and both tasted as if they had been reheated in the microwave for two minutes. Total waste of delicious food.

via Popular Science – New Technology, Science News, The Future Now https://www.popsci.com

February 7, 2020 at 05:31PM

Chrome will start protecting users from insecure downloads in April

https://www.engadget.com/2020/02/07/chrome-insecure-downloads-https/

Google Chrome will soon deliver on last year’s promise to better protect users from insecure content — downloads not encrypted via HTTPS — on otherwise secure pages. Chrome 82, which will be released in April, will be the first version of Google’s browser to warn users before allowing them to download certain insecure file types. In future releases, they’ll be blocked outright.

April’s release will only warn users when they try to download insecure executables — such as .exe files — since they pose the most risk for introducing malware into a system. Chrome will alert users to less dangerous types of insecure downloads on a rolling basis — archive, text and image files will trigger warnings in future releases. By the end of the year, Chrome will do away with the warnings and outright block insecure downloads from websites that are otherwise using HTTPS.

The mobile versions of Chrome will receive the same updates, but they’ll be one version behind the desktop versions of the browser. According to a Chromium blog post, mobile apps have better protection against malicious downloads, and the delay will give developers more time to concentrate on helping desktop users avoid malware.

While these updates may be frustrating — lots of warnings are bound to pop up — Chrome users will have a much safer browsing experience. Less tech-savvy users may benefit the most, as they often can’t spot fishy downloads. In other words, we may be able to spend less time removing malware and viruses from our friends’ and relatives’ computers once these new versions of Chrome roll out.

Source: Chromium

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

February 7, 2020 at 12:06PM

NASA wants to review Boeing’s Starliner work after setbacks

https://www.engadget.com/2020/02/07/nasa-review-boeing-starliner-software/

Boeing just can’t catch a break. Currently amid a lengthy controversy surrounding the company’s grounded 737 Max aircraft, the aerospace manufacturer is now facing scrutiny from NASA. Boeing’s CST-100 Starliner crew capsule was supposed to dock with the International Space Station during its inaugural test flight in December. However, a software error prevented the craft from reaching the correct orbit. Now, a second — and more dangerous — glitch has been uncovered. According to SpaceNews, NASA Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel member Paul Hill said, "…if it had gone uncorrected, it would have led to erroneous thruster firings and uncontrolled motion…with the potential for a catastrophic spacecraft failure," during a teleconference. Boeing and NASA were hoping to follow up December’s test with a manned flight, but after finding multiple problems with Boeing’s work, the space agency is calling for a review of the company’s software verification processes before proceeding.

NASA and Boeing are still investigating the first software error — which caused the craft to fire some of its thrusters too late and burn too much fuel — and are now trying to better understand the second glitch. These multiple issues warrant a deeper review, according to Hill. "The panel has a larger concern with the rigor of Boeing’s verification processes. Further, with confidence at risk for a spacecraft that is intended to carry humans in space, the panel recommends an even broader Boeing assessment of, and corrective actions in, Boeing’s [systems engineering and integration] processes and verification testing." Boeing says that it has accepted the suggestion and will coordinate with NASA, as well as take a $410 million charge against its earnings to help pay for a second unmanned test flight. The two organizations will decide on whether or not to actually conduct this second test by the end of February.

NASA was planning to use Boeing’s Starliner in a manned mission in December 2020, but it’s likely that the timeline has shifted in light of the pending review. It also wouldn’t be surprising if the ongoing concerns with the company’s 737 MAX impacted NASA’s decision to look deeper into the contractor’s practices. How these issues will affect Boeing as a company remain to be seen.

Source: SpaceNews, NASA

via Engadget http://www.engadget.com

February 7, 2020 at 01:09PM